CWBK
Price
$36.00
Change
-$0.80 (-2.17%)
Updated
Jul 3 closing price
Capitalization
98.68M
SCGLY
Price
$11.68
Change
+$0.17 (+1.48%)
Updated
Jul 3 closing price
Capitalization
22.18B
24 days until earnings call
Interact to see
Advertisement

CWBK vs SCGLY

Header iconCWBK vs SCGLY Comparison
Open Charts CWBK vs SCGLYBanner chart's image
CW Ban
Price$36.00
Change-$0.80 (-2.17%)
Volume$550
Capitalization98.68M
Societe Generale
Price$11.68
Change+$0.17 (+1.48%)
Volume$231.14K
Capitalization22.18B
CWBK vs SCGLY Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
CWBK
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
SCGLY
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
CWBK vs. SCGLY commentary
Jul 07, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CWBK is a Buy and SCGLY is a StrongBuy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jul 07, 2025
Stock price -- (CWBK: $36.00 vs. SCGLY: $11.68)
Brand notoriety: CWBK and SCGLY are both not notable
Both companies represent the Regional Banks industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: CWBK: 67% vs. SCGLY: 42%
Market capitalization -- CWBK: $98.68M vs. SCGLY: $22.18B
CWBK [@Regional Banks] is valued at $98.68M. SCGLY’s [@Regional Banks] market capitalization is $22.18B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Regional Banks] industry ranges from $133.96B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Regional Banks] industry is $6.03B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

CWBK’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileSCGLY’s FA Score has 3 green FA rating(s).

  • CWBK’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
  • SCGLY’s FA Score: 3 green, 2 red.
According to our system of comparison, CWBK is a better buy in the long-term than SCGLY.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

CWBK’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish while SCGLY’s TA Score has 3 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • CWBK’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 3 bearish.
  • SCGLY’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 5 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, CWBK is a better buy in the short-term than SCGLY.

Price Growth

CWBK (@Regional Banks) experienced а +3.75% price change this week, while SCGLY (@Regional Banks) price change was +4.47% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Regional Banks industry was +2.11%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +4.02%, and the average quarterly price growth was +11.70%.

Reported Earning Dates

SCGLY is expected to report earnings on Jul 31, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Regional Banks (+2.11% weekly)

Regional banks have a smaller reach than major banks, and cater mostly to one region of a country, such as a state or within a group of states. They offer services often similar – albeit with some limitations/smaller scale – compared to major banks. Taking deposits, making loans, mortgages, leases, credit cards , fund management, insurance and investment banking. SunTrust Banks, State Street Corp., M&T Bank Corp. are some examples of U.S. regional banks.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
SCGLY($22.2B) has a higher market cap than CWBK($98.7M). SCGLY has higher P/E ratio than CWBK: SCGLY (15.11) vs CWBK (5.84). SCGLY YTD gains are higher at: 116.245 vs. CWBK (2.375). CWBK has less debt than SCGLY: CWBK (54.2M) vs SCGLY (154B). SCGLY has higher revenues than CWBK: SCGLY (38.6B) vs CWBK (44.6M).
CWBKSCGLYCWBK / SCGLY
Capitalization98.7M22.2B0%
EBITDAN/AN/A-
Gain YTD2.375116.2452%
P/E Ratio5.8415.1139%
Revenue44.6M38.6B0%
Total Cash190MN/A-
Total Debt54.2M154B0%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
CWBK vs SCGLY: Fundamental Ratings
CWBK
SCGLY
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
5050
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
62
Fair valued
15
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
1212
SMR RATING
1..100
415
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
4936
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
1790
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
50n/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

SCGLY's Valuation (15) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for CWBK (62). This means that SCGLY’s stock grew somewhat faster than CWBK’s over the last 12 months.

SCGLY's Profit vs Risk Rating (12) in the null industry is in the same range as CWBK (12). This means that SCGLY’s stock grew similarly to CWBK’s over the last 12 months.

SCGLY's SMR Rating (5) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for CWBK (41). This means that SCGLY’s stock grew somewhat faster than CWBK’s over the last 12 months.

SCGLY's Price Growth Rating (36) in the null industry is in the same range as CWBK (49). This means that SCGLY’s stock grew similarly to CWBK’s over the last 12 months.

CWBK's P/E Growth Rating (17) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for SCGLY (90). This means that CWBK’s stock grew significantly faster than SCGLY’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
CWBKSCGLY
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
30%
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
63%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
38%
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
56%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
47%
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
74%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
43%
Bearish Trend 6 days ago
53%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
46%
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
74%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
48%
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
73%
Advances
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
75%
Declines
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 28 days ago
61%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
45%
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
63%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
59%
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
67%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
CWBK
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
SCGLY
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
CCMMX9.910.09
+0.92%
Conestoga Mid Cap Investors
GISOX18.480.14
+0.76%
Grandeur Peak Intl Stalwarts Inv
VVOCX19.800.13
+0.66%
Invesco Value Opportunities C
FCNAX46.170.28
+0.61%
Fidelity Advisor Consumer Discret A
PJEQX15.540.05
+0.32%
PGIM US Real Estate R6

CWBK and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that CWBK and NODB have been poorly correlated (+26% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that CWBK and NODB's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To CWBK
1D Price
Change %
CWBK100%
-2.17%
NODB - CWBK
26%
Poorly correlated
N/A
AX - CWBK
25%
Poorly correlated
+7.07%
SCGLY - CWBK
25%
Poorly correlated
+1.48%
FNWD - CWBK
25%
Poorly correlated
-0.42%
ERKH - CWBK
25%
Poorly correlated
+2.52%
More

SCGLY and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, SCGLY has been loosely correlated with CRARY. These tickers have moved in lockstep 62% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if SCGLY jumps, then CRARY could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To SCGLY
1D Price
Change %
SCGLY100%
+1.48%
CRARY - SCGLY
62%
Loosely correlated
-1.15%
BNPQY - SCGLY
58%
Loosely correlated
-0.77%
ISNPY - SCGLY
57%
Loosely correlated
+0.48%
UNCRY - SCGLY
54%
Loosely correlated
+0.12%
EBKDY - SCGLY
52%
Loosely correlated
-1.69%
More