CWBHF
Price
$0.09
Change
-$0.01 (-10.00%)
Updated
Jul 3 closing price
Capitalization
30.46M
32 days until earnings call
GTBIF
Price
$5.50
Change
-$0.02 (-0.36%)
Updated
Jul 3 closing price
Capitalization
1.68B
Interact to see
Advertisement

CWBHF vs GTBIF

Header iconCWBHF vs GTBIF Comparison
Open Charts CWBHF vs GTBIFBanner chart's image
Charlotte's Web Holdings
Price$0.09
Change-$0.01 (-10.00%)
Volume$99.25K
Capitalization30.46M
Green Thumb Industries
Price$5.50
Change-$0.02 (-0.36%)
Volume$141.77K
Capitalization1.68B
CWBHF vs GTBIF Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
CWBHF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
GTBIF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
CWBHF vs. GTBIF commentary
Jul 06, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CWBHF is a Hold and GTBIF is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jul 06, 2025
Stock price -- (CWBHF: $0.09 vs. GTBIF: $5.50)
Brand notoriety: CWBHF and GTBIF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Pharmaceuticals: Other industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: CWBHF: 76% vs. GTBIF: 45%
Market capitalization -- CWBHF: $30.46M vs. GTBIF: $1.68B
CWBHF [@Pharmaceuticals: Other] is valued at $30.46M. GTBIF’s [@Pharmaceuticals: Other] market capitalization is $1.68B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Pharmaceuticals: Other] industry ranges from $77.48B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Pharmaceuticals: Other] industry is $3.78B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

CWBHF’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileGTBIF’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • CWBHF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • GTBIF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, both CWBHF and GTBIF are a bad buy in the long-term.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

CWBHF’s TA Score shows that 2 TA indicator(s) are bullish while GTBIF’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • CWBHF’s TA Score: 2 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • GTBIF’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, GTBIF is a better buy in the short-term than CWBHF.

Price Growth

CWBHF (@Pharmaceuticals: Other) experienced а +0.99% price change this week, while GTBIF (@Pharmaceuticals: Other) price change was +3.97% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Pharmaceuticals: Other industry was +2.02%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +2.94%, and the average quarterly price growth was +92.60%.

Reported Earning Dates

CWBHF is expected to report earnings on Aug 07, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Pharmaceuticals: Other (+2.02% weekly)

Pharmaceuticals (Other) comprise companies that are involved in the discovery, development or manufacturing of therapeutic and preventative medicines. They often collaborate with or acquire other pharmaceutical/healthcare firms. Examples of companies in this segment include Bausch Health Companies Inc., Icon Plc and Perrigo Company Plc.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
GTBIF($1.68B) has a higher market cap than CWBHF($30.5M). CWBHF YTD gains are higher at: -0.085 vs. GTBIF (-32.681). GTBIF has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 253M vs. CWBHF (-47.53M). GTBIF has more cash in the bank: 185M vs. CWBHF (51M). CWBHF has less debt than GTBIF: CWBHF (58.9M) vs GTBIF (541M). GTBIF has higher revenues than CWBHF: GTBIF (1.02B) vs CWBHF (66.2M).
CWBHFGTBIFCWBHF / GTBIF
Capitalization30.5M1.68B2%
EBITDA-47.53M253M-19%
Gain YTD-0.085-32.6810%
P/E RatioN/A172.41-
Revenue66.2M1.02B6%
Total Cash51M185M28%
Total Debt58.9M541M11%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
CWBHF vs GTBIF: Fundamental Ratings
CWBHF
GTBIF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
5050
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
82
Overvalued
75
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
100100
SMR RATING
1..100
9887
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
6263
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
9894
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
5075

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

GTBIF's Valuation (75) in the null industry is in the same range as CWBHF (82). This means that GTBIF’s stock grew similarly to CWBHF’s over the last 12 months.

GTBIF's Profit vs Risk Rating (100) in the null industry is in the same range as CWBHF (100). This means that GTBIF’s stock grew similarly to CWBHF’s over the last 12 months.

GTBIF's SMR Rating (87) in the null industry is in the same range as CWBHF (98). This means that GTBIF’s stock grew similarly to CWBHF’s over the last 12 months.

CWBHF's Price Growth Rating (62) in the null industry is in the same range as GTBIF (63). This means that CWBHF’s stock grew similarly to GTBIF’s over the last 12 months.

GTBIF's P/E Growth Rating (94) in the null industry is in the same range as CWBHF (98). This means that GTBIF’s stock grew similarly to CWBHF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
CWBHFGTBIF
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
90%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
82%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
90%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
72%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
90%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
71%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
83%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
78%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
90%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
80%
Advances
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 11 days ago
83%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 11 days ago
90%
Bearish Trend 24 days ago
84%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
90%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
90%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
90%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
84%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
CWBHF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
GTBIF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
OMGAQ0.040.01
+26.21%
Omega Therapeutics, Inc.
NPIFF16.560.39
+2.41%
Northland Power, Inc.
GMGSF22.50N/A
N/A
Goodman Group Sydney NSW
NBVAF0.08N/A
N/A
Nubeva Technologies Ltd.
NPACY1.25N/A
N/A
Quadient SA

CWBHF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that CWBHF and TCNNF have been poorly correlated (+25% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that CWBHF and TCNNF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To CWBHF
1D Price
Change %
CWBHF100%
-2.17%
TCNNF - CWBHF
25%
Poorly correlated
+0.52%
GTBIF - CWBHF
23%
Poorly correlated
-0.36%
MEDIF - CWBHF
21%
Poorly correlated
-3.53%
CURLF - CWBHF
21%
Poorly correlated
+0.78%
TSNDF - CWBHF
20%
Poorly correlated
-2.20%
More

GTBIF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, GTBIF has been closely correlated with CURLF. These tickers have moved in lockstep 82% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if GTBIF jumps, then CURLF could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To GTBIF
1D Price
Change %
GTBIF100%
-0.36%
CURLF - GTBIF
82%
Closely correlated
+0.78%
TCNNF - GTBIF
82%
Closely correlated
+0.52%
VRNOF - GTBIF
79%
Closely correlated
-2.78%
TSNDF - GTBIF
77%
Closely correlated
-2.20%
CRLBF - GTBIF
71%
Closely correlated
-2.06%
More