CWBC
Price
$23.76
Change
+$0.20 (+0.85%)
Updated
Dec 11 closing price
Capitalization
455.2M
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
FRAF
Price
$54.15
Change
+$0.06 (+0.11%)
Updated
Dec 11 closing price
Capitalization
242.52M
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

CWBC vs FRAF

Header iconCWBC vs FRAF Comparison
Open Charts CWBC vs FRAFBanner chart's image
Community West Bancshares
Price$23.76
Change+$0.20 (+0.85%)
Volume$201.45K
Capitalization455.2M
Franklin Financial Services
Price$54.15
Change+$0.06 (+0.11%)
Volume$44.66K
Capitalization242.52M
CWBC vs FRAF Comparison Chart in %
CWBC
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
FRAF
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
CWBC vs. FRAF commentary
Dec 13, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CWBC is a StrongBuy and FRAF is a Buy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Dec 13, 2025
Stock price -- (CWBC: $23.76 vs. FRAF: $54.15)
Brand notoriety: CWBC and FRAF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Regional Banks industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: CWBC: 206% vs. FRAF: 146%
Market capitalization -- CWBC: $455.2M vs. FRAF: $242.52M
CWBC [@Regional Banks] is valued at $455.2M. FRAF’s [@Regional Banks] market capitalization is $242.52M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Regional Banks] industry ranges from $171.36B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Regional Banks] industry is $8.41B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

CWBC’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileFRAF’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).

  • CWBC’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • FRAF’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
According to our system of comparison, FRAF is a better buy in the long-term than CWBC.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

CWBC’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while FRAF’s TA Score has 5 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • CWBC’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • FRAF’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 5 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, CWBC is a better buy in the short-term than FRAF.

Price Growth

CWBC (@Regional Banks) experienced а +1.11% price change this week, while FRAF (@Regional Banks) price change was +0.31% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Regional Banks industry was +2.16%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +5.32%, and the average quarterly price growth was +17.66%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Regional Banks (+2.16% weekly)

Regional banks have a smaller reach than major banks, and cater mostly to one region of a country, such as a state or within a group of states. They offer services often similar – albeit with some limitations/smaller scale – compared to major banks. Taking deposits, making loans, mortgages, leases, credit cards , fund management, insurance and investment banking. SunTrust Banks, State Street Corp., M&T Bank Corp. are some examples of U.S. regional banks.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CWBC($455M) has a higher market cap than FRAF($243M). FRAF has higher P/E ratio than CWBC: FRAF (15.51) vs CWBC (13.05). FRAF YTD gains are higher at: 87.110 vs. CWBC (25.766). CWBC has more cash in the bank: 48.2M vs. FRAF (27.4M). CWBC has less debt than FRAF: CWBC (156M) vs FRAF (224M). CWBC has higher revenues than FRAF: CWBC (133M) vs FRAF (76.1M).
CWBCFRAFCWBC / FRAF
Capitalization455M243M187%
EBITDAN/AN/A-
Gain YTD25.76687.11030%
P/E Ratio13.0515.5184%
Revenue133M76.1M175%
Total Cash48.2M27.4M176%
Total Debt156M224M70%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
CWBC vs FRAF: Fundamental Ratings
CWBC
FRAF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
8185
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
51
Fair valued
64
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
478
SMR RATING
1..100
4251
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
4439
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
9814
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
5050

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

CWBC's Valuation (51) in the Regional Banks industry is in the same range as FRAF (64). This means that CWBC’s stock grew similarly to FRAF’s over the last 12 months.

FRAF's Profit vs Risk Rating (8) in the Regional Banks industry is somewhat better than the same rating for CWBC (47). This means that FRAF’s stock grew somewhat faster than CWBC’s over the last 12 months.

CWBC's SMR Rating (42) in the Regional Banks industry is in the same range as FRAF (51). This means that CWBC’s stock grew similarly to FRAF’s over the last 12 months.

FRAF's Price Growth Rating (39) in the Regional Banks industry is in the same range as CWBC (44). This means that FRAF’s stock grew similarly to CWBC’s over the last 12 months.

FRAF's P/E Growth Rating (14) in the Regional Banks industry is significantly better than the same rating for CWBC (98). This means that FRAF’s stock grew significantly faster than CWBC’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
CWBCFRAF
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
57%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
49%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
52%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
57%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
74%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
63%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
67%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
48%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
67%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
54%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
63%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
48%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
69%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
62%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
62%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
56%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
64%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
60%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
63%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
43%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
CWBC
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
FRAF
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
GIGGF0.06N/A
+5.00%
Giga Metals Corp
PBSFY1.320.03
+2.14%
ProSiebenSat.1 Media SE
EXPGF44.67N/A
N/A
Experian plc
UNLRY3.19N/A
N/A
PT Unilever Indonesia Tbk
PLMJF12.00N/A
N/A
Plum Acquisition Corp. III

CWBC and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, CWBC has been closely correlated with SFNC. These tickers have moved in lockstep 84% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if CWBC jumps, then SFNC could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To CWBC
1D Price
Change %
CWBC100%
+0.85%
SFNC - CWBC
84%
Closely correlated
-0.41%
UBSI - CWBC
84%
Closely correlated
+0.64%
FRME - CWBC
83%
Closely correlated
+0.52%
UVSP - CWBC
83%
Closely correlated
+1.78%
UCB - CWBC
83%
Closely correlated
+0.12%
More

FRAF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, FRAF has been loosely correlated with MRBK. These tickers have moved in lockstep 61% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if FRAF jumps, then MRBK could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To FRAF
1D Price
Change %
FRAF100%
+0.10%
MRBK - FRAF
61%
Loosely correlated
+3.55%
WNEB - FRAF
60%
Loosely correlated
+0.69%
FUNC - FRAF
58%
Loosely correlated
+2.28%
CCNE - FRAF
57%
Loosely correlated
+0.51%
CWBC - FRAF
57%
Loosely correlated
+0.85%
More