56 days until earnings call
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CWB vs TTWO
CWB vs TTWO Comparison
Open Charts CWB vs TTWO
SPDR® Blmbg Convert Secs ETF
Price$80.27
Change-$0.57 (-0.71%)
Volume$234.75K
Net Assets3.78B
Take-Two Interactive Software
Price$230.23
Change-$4.23 (-1.80%)
Volume$2.01M
Capitalization25.33B
CWB vs TTWO Comparison Chart
Loading...
Show more...
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CWB vs. TTWO commentary
Jun 16, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CWB is a Hold and TTWO is a Buy.
SUMMARIES
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
TTWO: Fundamental Ratings
TTWO | ||
|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 50 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 84 Overvalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 48 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 98 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 13 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 13 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 50 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
| CWB | TTWO | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 59% | N/A |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 78% | 3 days ago 52% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 81% | 3 days ago 70% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 70% | 3 days ago 70% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 73% | 3 days ago 57% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 72% | 3 days ago 62% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 6 days ago 78% | 6 days ago 65% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 75% | 3 days ago 57% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 72% | N/A |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 75% | 3 days ago 62% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Show more...
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
CWB and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, CWB has been loosely correlated with GCI. These tickers have moved in lockstep 54% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if CWB jumps, then GCI could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To CWB | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CWB | 100% | -0.71% | ||
| GCI - CWB | 54% Loosely correlated | -3.41% | ||
| BTSGU - CWB | 43% Loosely correlated | -0.57% | ||
| TTWO - CWB | 41% Loosely correlated | -1.80% | ||
| SO - CWB | 21% Poorly correlated | -0.01% |
TTWO and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, TTWO has been loosely correlated with NET. These tickers have moved in lockstep 48% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if TTWO jumps, then NET could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To TTWO | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| TTWO | 100% | -1.80% | ||
| NET - TTWO | 48% Loosely correlated | +0.68% | ||
| DOCS - TTWO | 48% Loosely correlated | -1.81% | ||
| SSNC - TTWO | 43% Loosely correlated | -2.99% | ||
| PANW - TTWO | 43% Loosely correlated | -0.71% | ||
| FRSH - TTWO | 41% Loosely correlated | -4.60% | ||
More | ||||