CWB | QCON | CWB / QCON | |
Gain YTD | 19.780 | 8.108 | 244% |
Net Assets | 4.74B | 24M | 19,750% |
Total Expense Ratio | 0.40 | 0.32 | 125% |
Turnover | N/A | 63.00 | - |
Yield | 1.77 | 2.64 | 67% |
Fund Existence | 17 years | 5 years | - |
CWB | QCON | |
---|---|---|
RSI ODDS (%) | 4 days ago74% | N/A |
Stochastic ODDS (%) | 4 days ago75% | N/A |
Momentum ODDS (%) | 4 days ago73% | N/A |
MACD ODDS (%) | 4 days ago71% | N/A |
TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 4 days ago80% | 4 days ago68% |
TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 4 days ago78% | 4 days ago63% |
Advances ODDS (%) | 6 days ago78% | N/A |
Declines ODDS (%) | 4 days ago73% | N/A |
BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 4 days ago69% | N/A |
Aroon ODDS (%) | 4 days ago75% | 4 days ago57% |
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, CWB has been loosely correlated with GCI. These tickers have moved in lockstep 56% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if CWB jumps, then GCI could also see price increases.
Ticker / NAME | Correlation To CWB | 1D Price Change % | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
CWB | 100% | -0.41% | ||
GCI - CWB | 56% Loosely correlated | -1.93% | ||
TTWO - CWB | 43% Loosely correlated | +0.82% | ||
BTSGU - CWB | 5% Poorly correlated | +0.62% | ||
SO - CWB | -2% Poorly correlated | -0.64% |
A.I.dvisor tells us that QCON and ECPG have been poorly correlated (+16% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that QCON and ECPG's prices will move in lockstep.
Ticker / NAME | Correlation To QCON | 1D Price Change % | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
QCON | 100% | N/A | ||
ECPG - QCON | 16% Poorly correlated | +2.05% | ||
PCG - QCON | 15% Poorly correlated | -0.48% | ||
GTLS - QCON | 11% Poorly correlated | -0.14% | ||
VIAV - QCON | 10% Poorly correlated | -2.10% | ||
AEP - QCON | 10% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
More |