CWB | NCZ | CWB / NCZ | |
Gain YTD | 3.908 | 3.553 | 110% |
Net Assets | 3.78B | 254M | 1,489% |
Total Expense Ratio | 0.40 | 2.82 | 14% |
Turnover | 30.00 | 118.00 | 25% |
Yield | 1.92 | 0.21 | 912% |
Fund Existence | 16 years | 22 years | - |
CWB | NCZ | |
---|---|---|
RSI ODDS (%) | 4 days ago59% | 4 days ago83% |
Stochastic ODDS (%) | 4 days ago78% | 4 days ago79% |
Momentum ODDS (%) | 4 days ago81% | 4 days ago87% |
MACD ODDS (%) | 4 days ago70% | 4 days ago83% |
TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 4 days ago73% | 4 days ago84% |
TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 4 days ago72% | 4 days ago85% |
Advances ODDS (%) | 7 days ago78% | 21 days ago86% |
Declines ODDS (%) | 4 days ago75% | 26 days ago85% |
BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 5 days ago72% | 4 days ago81% |
Aroon ODDS (%) | 4 days ago75% | 4 days ago84% |
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, CWB has been loosely correlated with GCI. These tickers have moved in lockstep 54% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if CWB jumps, then GCI could also see price increases.
Ticker / NAME | Correlation To CWB | 1D Price Change % | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
CWB | 100% | -0.71% | ||
GCI - CWB | 54% Loosely correlated | -3.41% | ||
BTSGU - CWB | 43% Loosely correlated | -0.57% | ||
TTWO - CWB | 41% Loosely correlated | -1.80% | ||
SO - CWB | 21% Poorly correlated | -0.01% |