CWB | ICVT | CWB / ICVT | |
Gain YTD | 10.601 | 10.430 | 102% |
Net Assets | 4.18B | 2.89B | 144% |
Total Expense Ratio | 0.40 | 0.20 | 200% |
Turnover | 30.00 | 25.00 | 120% |
Yield | 1.89 | 2.13 | 89% |
Fund Existence | 16 years | 10 years | - |
CWB | ICVT | |
---|---|---|
RSI ODDS (%) | 3 days ago74% | 3 days ago72% |
Stochastic ODDS (%) | 3 days ago77% | 3 days ago72% |
Momentum ODDS (%) | 3 days ago81% | 5 days ago73% |
MACD ODDS (%) | 3 days ago75% | 3 days ago72% |
TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 3 days ago80% | 3 days ago79% |
TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 3 days ago78% | 3 days ago78% |
Advances ODDS (%) | 5 days ago78% | 5 days ago81% |
Declines ODDS (%) | N/A | N/A |
BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 3 days ago68% | 3 days ago69% |
Aroon ODDS (%) | 3 days ago74% | 3 days ago73% |
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, CWB has been loosely correlated with GCI. These tickers have moved in lockstep 55% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if CWB jumps, then GCI could also see price increases.
Ticker / NAME | Correlation To CWB | 1D Price Change % | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
CWB | 100% | +0.07% | ||
GCI - CWB | 55% Loosely correlated | -0.27% | ||
BTSGU - CWB | 43% Loosely correlated | -1.16% | ||
TTWO - CWB | 41% Loosely correlated | -0.44% | ||
SO - CWB | 21% Poorly correlated | +0.37% |
A.I.dvisor tells us that ICVT and GCI have been poorly correlated (+30% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that ICVT and GCI's prices will move in lockstep.
Ticker / NAME | Correlation To ICVT | 1D Price Change % | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
ICVT | 100% | +0.05% | ||
GCI - ICVT | 30% Poorly correlated | -0.27% | ||
NRG - ICVT | 26% Poorly correlated | -0.87% |