Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CWB vs ICVT
CWB vs ICVT Comparison
Open Charts CWB vs ICVT
SPDR® Blmbg Convert Secs ETF
Price$85.35
Change+$0.06 (+0.07%)
Volume$378.46K
Net Assets4.18B
iShares Convertible Bond ETF
Price$92.89
Change+$0.05 (+0.05%)
Volume$150.79K
Net Assets2.89B
CWB vs ICVT Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
Show more...
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CWB vs. ICVT commentary
Jul 27, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CWB is a Buy and ICVT is a Buy.
SUMMARIES
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CWB has more net assets: 4.18B vs. ICVT (2.89B). CWB (10.601) and ICVT (10.430) have matching annual dividend yield . CWB was incepted earlier than ICVT: CWB (16 years) vs ICVT (10 years). ICVT (0.20) has a lower expense ratio than CWB (0.40). CWB has a higher turnover ICVT (25.00) vs ICVT (25.00).
| CWB | ICVT | CWB / ICVT | |
| Gain YTD | 10.601 | 10.430 | 102% |
| Net Assets | 4.18B | 2.89B | 144% |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.40 | 0.20 | 200% |
| Turnover | 30.00 | 25.00 | 120% |
| Yield | 1.89 | 2.13 | 89% |
| Fund Existence | 16 years | 10 years | - |
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
| CWB | ICVT | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 74% | 3 days ago 72% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 77% | 3 days ago 72% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 81% | 5 days ago 73% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 75% | 3 days ago 72% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 80% | 3 days ago 79% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 78% | 3 days ago 78% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 5 days ago 78% | 5 days ago 81% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | N/A | N/A |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 68% | 3 days ago 69% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 74% | 3 days ago 73% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Show more...
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
CWB and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, CWB has been loosely correlated with GCI. These tickers have moved in lockstep 55% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if CWB jumps, then GCI could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To CWB | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CWB | 100% | +0.07% | ||
| GCI - CWB | 55% Loosely correlated | -0.27% | ||
| BTSGU - CWB | 43% Loosely correlated | -1.16% | ||
| TTWO - CWB | 41% Loosely correlated | -0.44% | ||
| SO - CWB | 21% Poorly correlated | +0.37% |
ICVT and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor tells us that ICVT and GCI have been poorly correlated (+30% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that ICVT and GCI's prices will move in lockstep.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To ICVT | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ICVT | 100% | +0.05% | ||
| GCI - ICVT | 30% Poorly correlated | -0.27% | ||
| NRG - ICVT | 26% Poorly correlated | -0.87% |