Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CWB vs FCVT
CWB vs FCVT Comparison
Open Charts CWB vs FCVT
SPDR® Blmbg Convert Secs ETF
Price$85.35
Change+$0.06 (+0.07%)
Volume$378.46K
Net Assets4.16B
First Trust SSI Strat Convert Secs ETF
Price$39.89
Change+$0.05 (+0.13%)
Volume$5.87K
Net Assets91.94M
CWB vs FCVT Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
Show more...
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CWB vs. FCVT commentary
Jul 27, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CWB is a Buy and FCVT is a Buy.
SUMMARIES
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CWB has more net assets: 4.16B vs. FCVT (91.9M). CWB (10.601) and FCVT (10.209) have matching annual dividend yield . CWB was incepted earlier than FCVT: CWB (16 years) vs FCVT (10 years). CWB (0.40) has a lower expense ratio than FCVT (0.95). FCVT has a higher turnover CWB (30.00) vs CWB (30.00).
| CWB | FCVT | CWB / FCVT | |
| Gain YTD | 10.601 | 10.209 | 104% |
| Net Assets | 4.16B | 91.9M | 4,522% |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.40 | 0.95 | 42% |
| Turnover | 30.00 | 100.00 | 30% |
| Yield | 1.89 | 1.99 | 95% |
| Fund Existence | 16 years | 10 years | - |
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
| CWB | FCVT | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 74% | 2 days ago 67% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | N/A | N/A |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | N/A | N/A |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 75% | 2 days ago 80% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 80% | 2 days ago 80% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 78% | 2 days ago 80% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 78% | 4 days ago 82% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | N/A | N/A |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 68% | N/A |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 74% | 2 days ago 74% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Show more...
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
CWB and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, CWB has been loosely correlated with GCI. These tickers have moved in lockstep 55% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if CWB jumps, then GCI could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To CWB | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CWB | 100% | +0.07% | ||
| GCI - CWB | 55% Loosely correlated | -0.27% | ||
| BTSGU - CWB | 43% Loosely correlated | -1.16% | ||
| TTWO - CWB | 41% Loosely correlated | -0.44% | ||
| SO - CWB | 21% Poorly correlated | +0.37% |
FCVT and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, FCVT has been loosely correlated with BTSGU. These tickers have moved in lockstep 40% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if FCVT jumps, then BTSGU could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To FCVT | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| FCVT | 100% | -0.08% | ||
| BTSGU - FCVT | 40% Loosely correlated | -1.16% |