Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CWB vs FCVT
CWB vs FCVT Comparison
Open Charts CWB vs FCVT
State Street® SPDR® Blmbg Cnvrt Secs ETF
Price$90.74
Change+$0.14 (+0.15%)
Volume$314.97K
Net Assets4.66B
First Trust SSI Strat Convert Secs ETF
Price$43.77
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Volume$3.07K
Net Assets96.6M
CWB vs FCVT Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CWB vs. FCVT commentary
Dec 26, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CWB is a Buy and FCVT is a Hold.
SUMMARIES
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CWB has more net assets: 4.66B vs. FCVT (96.6M). FCVT has a higher annual dividend yield than CWB: FCVT (21.369) vs CWB (18.222). CWB was incepted earlier than FCVT: CWB (17 years) vs FCVT (10 years). CWB (0.40) has a lower expense ratio than FCVT (0.95). FCVT has a higher turnover CWB (32.00) vs CWB (32.00).
| CWB | FCVT | CWB / FCVT | |
| Gain YTD | 18.222 | 21.369 | 85% |
| Net Assets | 4.66B | 96.6M | 4,824% |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.40 | 0.95 | 42% |
| Turnover | 32.00 | 100.00 | 32% |
| Yield | 1.80 | 1.94 | 93% |
| Fund Existence | 17 years | 10 years | - |
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
| CWB | FCVT | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 79% | 2 days ago 76% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 71% | 2 days ago 78% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 74% | 2 days ago 78% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 88% | 2 days ago 90% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 80% | 2 days ago 79% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 77% | 2 days ago 79% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 77% | 4 days ago 81% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 9 days ago 73% | 2 days ago 77% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 77% | 2 days ago 85% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 73% | 2 days ago 74% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers
CWB and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, CWB has been loosely correlated with TTWO. These tickers have moved in lockstep 43% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if CWB jumps, then TTWO could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To CWB | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CWB | 100% | +0.15% | ||
| TTWO - CWB | 43% Loosely correlated | +0.95% | ||
| BTSGU - CWB | 42% Loosely correlated | -0.58% | ||
| SO - CWB | -3% Poorly correlated | +0.90% |
FCVT and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, FCVT has been loosely correlated with BTSGU. These tickers have moved in lockstep 39% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if FCVT jumps, then BTSGU could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To FCVT | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| FCVT | 100% | -0.00% | ||
| BTSGU - FCVT | 39% Loosely correlated | -0.58% |