CWB | FCVT | CWB / FCVT | |
Gain YTD | 19.780 | 21.112 | 94% |
Net Assets | 4.76B | 103M | 4,622% |
Total Expense Ratio | 0.40 | 0.95 | 42% |
Turnover | N/A | 100.00 | - |
Yield | 1.77 | 1.93 | 92% |
Fund Existence | 17 years | 10 years | - |
CWB | FCVT | |
---|---|---|
RSI ODDS (%) | 3 days ago68% | 3 days ago69% |
Stochastic ODDS (%) | 3 days ago74% | 3 days ago76% |
Momentum ODDS (%) | N/A | N/A |
MACD ODDS (%) | 3 days ago80% | 3 days ago80% |
TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 3 days ago72% | 3 days ago80% |
TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 3 days ago78% | 3 days ago80% |
Advances ODDS (%) | 4 days ago78% | 4 days ago82% |
Declines ODDS (%) | 9 days ago74% | 9 days ago77% |
BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 3 days ago58% | 3 days ago80% |
Aroon ODDS (%) | 3 days ago75% | 3 days ago76% |
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, CWB has been loosely correlated with GCI. These tickers have moved in lockstep 56% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if CWB jumps, then GCI could also see price increases.
Ticker / NAME | Correlation To CWB | 1D Price Change % | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
CWB | 100% | -0.41% | ||
GCI - CWB | 56% Loosely correlated | -1.93% | ||
TTWO - CWB | 43% Loosely correlated | +0.82% | ||
BTSGU - CWB | 4% Poorly correlated | +0.62% | ||
SO - CWB | -2% Poorly correlated | -0.64% |
A.I.dvisor tells us that FCVT and BTSGU have been poorly correlated (+0% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that FCVT and BTSGU's prices will move in lockstep.
Ticker / NAME | Correlation To FCVT | 1D Price Change % | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
FCVT | 100% | -0.71% | ||
BTSGU - FCVT | 0% Poorly correlated | +0.62% |