CWAN
Price
$18.18
Change
-$0.39 (-2.10%)
Updated
Sep 23, 04:59 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
5.73B
36 days until earnings call
HUBS
Price
$513.11
Change
-$9.86 (-1.89%)
Updated
Sep 23, 04:59 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
27.56B
43 days until earnings call
Interact to see
Advertisement

CWAN vs HUBS

Header iconCWAN vs HUBS Comparison
Open Charts CWAN vs HUBSBanner chart's image
Clearwater Analytics Holdings
Price$18.18
Change-$0.39 (-2.10%)
Volume$37.5K
Capitalization5.73B
HUBSPOT
Price$513.11
Change-$9.86 (-1.89%)
Volume$4.75K
Capitalization27.56B
CWAN vs HUBS Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
CWAN
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
HUBS
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
CWAN vs. HUBS commentary
Sep 24, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CWAN is a Hold and HUBS is a Buy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Sep 24, 2025
Stock price -- (CWAN: $18.57 vs. HUBS: $522.97)
Brand notoriety: CWAN and HUBS are both not notable
Both companies represent the Packaged Software industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: CWAN: 145% vs. HUBS: 59%
Market capitalization -- CWAN: $5.73B vs. HUBS: $27.56B
CWAN [@Packaged Software] is valued at $5.73B. HUBS’s [@Packaged Software] market capitalization is $27.56B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Packaged Software] industry ranges from $311.01B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Packaged Software] industry is $9.22B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

CWAN’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileHUBS’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • CWAN’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • HUBS’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, CWAN is a better buy in the long-term than HUBS.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

CWAN’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while HUBS’s TA Score has 7 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • CWAN’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • HUBS’s TA Score: 7 bullish, 3 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, HUBS is a better buy in the short-term than CWAN.

Price Growth

CWAN (@Packaged Software) experienced а -4.08% price change this week, while HUBS (@Packaged Software) price change was +2.92% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Packaged Software industry was +3.80%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +2.86%, and the average quarterly price growth was +70.85%.

Reported Earning Dates

CWAN is expected to report earnings on Oct 29, 2025.

HUBS is expected to report earnings on Nov 05, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Packaged Software (+3.80% weekly)

Packaged software comprises multiple software programs bundled together and sold as a group. For example, Microsoft Office includes multiple applications such as Excel, Word, and PowerPoint. In some cases, buying a bundled product is cheaper than purchasing each item individually[s20] . Microsoft Corporation, Oracle Corp. and Adobe are some major American packaged software makers.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
HUBS($27.6B) has a higher market cap than CWAN($5.73B). HUBS has higher P/E ratio than CWAN: HUBS (7023.44) vs CWAN (11.61). HUBS YTD gains are higher at: -24.944 vs. CWAN (-32.522). HUBS has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 126M vs. CWAN (37.4M). HUBS has more cash in the bank: 1.67B vs. CWAN (71.9M). HUBS has less debt than CWAN: HUBS (281M) vs CWAN (925M). HUBS has higher revenues than CWAN: HUBS (2.85B) vs CWAN (551M).
CWANHUBSCWAN / HUBS
Capitalization5.73B27.6B21%
EBITDA37.4M126M30%
Gain YTD-32.522-24.944130%
P/E Ratio11.617023.440%
Revenue551M2.85B19%
Total Cash71.9M1.67B4%
Total Debt925M281M329%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
HUBS: Fundamental Ratings
HUBS
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
19
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
100
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
71
SMR RATING
1..100
92
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
55
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
73
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
50

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
CWANHUBS
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
73%
Bullish Trend 7 days ago
75%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
74%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
68%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
71%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
73%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
59%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
81%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
70%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
77%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
74%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
79%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 26 days ago
73%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
77%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 7 days ago
69%
Bearish Trend 29 days ago
68%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
69%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
74%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 6 days ago
81%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
75%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
CWAN
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
HUBS
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
PPA151.800.77
+0.51%
Invesco Aerospace & Defense ETF
SMIZ37.730.17
+0.46%
Zacks Small/Mid Cap ETF
CCRV20.00N/A
N/A
iShares Commodity Curve Carry Strategy ETF
SKOR49.28-0.03
-0.06%
FlexShares Credit-Scored US Corp Bd ETF
TGONF19.28-0.02
-0.10%
Tetragon Financial Group

CWAN and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, CWAN has been loosely correlated with FRSH. These tickers have moved in lockstep 62% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if CWAN jumps, then FRSH could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To CWAN
1D Price
Change %
CWAN100%
+1.87%
FRSH - CWAN
62%
Loosely correlated
+1.63%
QTWO - CWAN
56%
Loosely correlated
+0.79%
ACIW - CWAN
52%
Loosely correlated
+3.95%
HUBS - CWAN
52%
Loosely correlated
+0.80%
FROG - CWAN
51%
Loosely correlated
+0.78%
More

HUBS and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, HUBS has been closely correlated with CRM. These tickers have moved in lockstep 72% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if HUBS jumps, then CRM could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To HUBS
1D Price
Change %
HUBS100%
+0.80%
CRM - HUBS
72%
Closely correlated
+1.05%
TEAM - HUBS
71%
Closely correlated
+0.93%
NOW - HUBS
70%
Closely correlated
-1.39%
S - HUBS
67%
Closely correlated
+0.52%
FRSH - HUBS
66%
Closely correlated
+1.63%
More