Advertisement
CWAN vs GUNGF
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CWAN is a Buy and GUNGF is a Buy.
Long-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
CWAN’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileGUNGF’s FA Score has 3 green FA rating(s).
- CWAN’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
- GUNGF’s FA Score: 3 green, 2 red.
Short-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
CWAN’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while GUNGF’s TA Score has 1 bullish TA indicator(s).
- CWAN’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 4 bearish.
- GUNGF’s TA Score: 1 bullish, 0 bearish.
Price Growth
CWAN (@Packaged Software) experienced а -0.71% price change this week, while GUNGF (@Electronics/Appliances) price change was 0.00% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Packaged Software industry was -0.06%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +1.88%, and the average quarterly price growth was +110.84%.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Electronics/Appliances industry was +6.98%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +9.01%, and the average quarterly price growth was +17.24%.
Reported Earning Dates
CWAN is expected to report earnings on Oct 29, 2025.
Industries' Descriptions
@Packaged Software (-0.06% weekly)Packaged software comprises multiple software programs bundled together and sold as a group. For example, Microsoft Office includes multiple applications such as Excel, Word, and PowerPoint. In some cases, buying a bundled product is cheaper than purchasing each item individually[s20] . Microsoft Corporation, Oracle Corp. and Adobe are some major American packaged software makers.
@Electronics/Appliances (+6.98% weekly)TVs, telephones, washing machines, home speakers and even home-office equipment like computers and printers…the list is virtually endless when it comes to consumer electronics and appliances. And, with ‘smarthomes’ increasingly becoming the reality, we could see a sharp surge in high-tech gadgets (including robotic appliances) making their way into our homes– and therefore spelling plenty opportunities in the related industries. Consumers account for 70% of US GDP, and their purchases of high-functioning electronics could make significant dents in the economy’s health. Sony Corp., Whirlpool and iRobot are some of the major consumer electronics/appliances makers.
| CWAN | GUNGF | CWAN / GUNGF | |
| Capitalization | 5.58B | 1.02B | 547% |
| EBITDA | 37.4M | 12.6B | 0% |
| Gain YTD | -34.230 | 5.224 | -655% |
| P/E Ratio | 11.31 | 34.10 | 33% |
| Revenue | 551M | 101B | 1% |
| Total Cash | 71.9M | 137B | 0% |
| Total Debt | 925M | N/A | - |
GUNGF | ||
|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 30 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 29 Undervalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 68 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 10 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 47 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 6 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 50 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
| CWAN | GUNGF | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 83% | N/A |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 74% | N/A |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 71% | N/A |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 65% | N/A |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 70% | 2 days ago 16% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 74% | 2 days ago 17% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 29 days ago 73% | N/A |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 69% | N/A |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 69% | N/A |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 77% | 4 days ago 15% |
Advertisement
| 1 Day | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| MFs / NAME | Price $ | Chg $ | Chg % |
| ARIDX | 6.20 | 0.10 | +1.68% |
| AMG River Road Dividend All Cap Value I | |||
| GMOIX | 32.18 | 0.36 | +1.13% |
| GMO International Equity III | |||
| HDGTX | 37.78 | 0.26 | +0.68% |
| Hartford Dividend and Growth R5 | |||
| NGRDX | 33.32 | 0.12 | +0.36% |
| Neuberger Berman Large Cap Growth R6 | |||
| ALOCX | 19.87 | 0.04 | +0.20% |
| Alger Mid Cap Focus C | |||
CWAN and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, CWAN has been loosely correlated with FRSH. These tickers have moved in lockstep 62% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if CWAN jumps, then FRSH could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To CWAN | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CWAN | 100% | +0.72% | ||
| FRSH - CWAN | 62% Loosely correlated | +0.16% | ||
| QTWO - CWAN | 57% Loosely correlated | +1.96% | ||
| ACIW - CWAN | 52% Loosely correlated | +1.08% | ||
| HUBS - CWAN | 52% Loosely correlated | +2.20% | ||
| FROG - CWAN | 51% Loosely correlated | +1.05% | ||
More | ||||
GUNGF and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, GUNGF has been loosely correlated with RDWR. These tickers have moved in lockstep 37% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if GUNGF jumps, then RDWR could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To GUNGF | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| GUNGF | 100% | N/A | ||
| RDWR - GUNGF | 37% Loosely correlated | +1.82% | ||
| CWAN - GUNGF | 26% Poorly correlated | +0.67% | ||
| MKTDF - GUNGF | 26% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
| IDCC - GUNGF | 23% Poorly correlated | +1.80% | ||
| WFCF - GUNGF | 23% Poorly correlated | -0.44% | ||
More | ||||