Advertisement
CW vs PL
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CW is a Hold and PL is a Buy.
Long-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
CW’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whilePL’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).
- CW’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
- PL’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
Short-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
CW’s TA Score shows that 2 TA indicator(s) are bullish while PL’s TA Score has 5 bullish TA indicator(s).
- CW’s TA Score: 2 bullish, 8 bearish.
- PL’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 4 bearish.
Price Growth
CW (@Aerospace & Defense) experienced а -4.81% price change this week, while PL (@Aerospace & Defense) price change was +2.47% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Aerospace & Defense industry was +3.24%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -0.48%, and the average quarterly price growth was +19.59%.
Reported Earning Dates
CW is expected to report earnings on Feb 25, 2026.
PL is expected to report earnings on Dec 10, 2025.
Industries' Descriptions
@Aerospace & Defense (+3.24% weekly)Aerospace & Defense is one of largest industries in the U.S., mainly comprising the following areas: commercial airliners, military aircraft, missiles, space, and general aviation. Focused heavily on research & development, it is also one of the fastest growing industries. Military aircraft has the largest market share in the industry’s sales, followed by space systems, civil aircraft, and missiles. Aerospace exports, directly and indirectly, support more jobs than the export of any other commodity, according to a study by the U.S. Department of Commerce. Boeing Company, Lockheed Martin Corporation and General Electric Company are some of the most prominent players in this space.
| CW | PL | CW / PL | |
| Capitalization | 19.8B | 3.7B | 535% |
| EBITDA | 738M | -41.61M | -1,774% |
| Gain YTD | 51.253 | 197.277 | 26% |
| P/E Ratio | 43.67 | N/A | - |
| Revenue | 3.31B | 262M | 1,261% |
| Total Cash | N/A | 272M | - |
| Total Debt | 1.13B | 17.5M | 6,451% |
CW | ||
|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 14 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 69 Overvalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 5 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 49 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 47 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 21 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 75 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
| CW | PL | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 54% | N/A |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 47% | 2 days ago 73% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 59% | 2 days ago 65% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 55% | 2 days ago 65% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 50% | 2 days ago 77% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 57% | 2 days ago 73% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 7 days ago 68% | 2 days ago 78% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 17 days ago 48% | 14 days ago 76% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 74% | 2 days ago 78% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 58% | 2 days ago 76% |
Advertisement
| 1 Day | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| ETFs / NAME | Price $ | Chg $ | Chg % |
| MIY | 11.77 | 0.06 | +0.51% |
| Blackrock Muniyield Michigan Quality Fund | |||
| DTF | 11.28 | N/A | N/A |
| DTF Tax-Free Income 2028 Term Fund | |||
| BBLB | 85.24 | N/A | N/A |
| JPMorgan BetaBuilders U.S. TrsBd20+YrETF | |||
| PQJL | 28.78 | N/A | N/A |
| PGIM NASDAQ-100 BUFFER 12 ETF - JULY | |||
| GOF | 12.12 | -0.08 | -0.66% |
| Guggenheim Strategic Opportunities Fund | |||
CW and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, CW has been closely correlated with BWXT. These tickers have moved in lockstep 76% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if CW jumps, then BWXT could also see price increases.
PL and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, PL has been loosely correlated with RKLB. These tickers have moved in lockstep 50% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if PL jumps, then RKLB could also see price increases.