CVVUF
Price
$0.65
Change
-$0.01 (-1.52%)
Updated
Sep 5 closing price
Capitalization
121.39M
DBLVF
Price
$0.44
Change
-$0.03 (-6.38%)
Updated
Sep 5 closing price
Capitalization
95.32M
Interact to see
Advertisement

CVVUF vs DBLVF

Header iconCVVUF vs DBLVF Comparison
Open Charts CVVUF vs DBLVFBanner chart's image
CanAlaska Uranium
Price$0.65
Change-$0.01 (-1.52%)
Volume$20.93K
Capitalization121.39M
Doubleview Gold
Price$0.44
Change-$0.03 (-6.38%)
Volume$1K
Capitalization95.32M
CVVUF vs DBLVF Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
CVVUF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
DBLVF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
CVVUF vs. DBLVF commentary
Sep 08, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CVVUF is a Hold and DBLVF is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Sep 08, 2025
Stock price -- (CVVUF: $0.65 vs. DBLVF: $0.44)
Brand notoriety: CVVUF and DBLVF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Other Metals/Minerals industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: CVVUF: 13% vs. DBLVF: 2%
Market capitalization -- CVVUF: $121.39M vs. DBLVF: $95.32M
CVVUF [@Other Metals/Minerals] is valued at $121.39M. DBLVF’s [@Other Metals/Minerals] market capitalization is $95.32M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Other Metals/Minerals] industry ranges from $223.12B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Other Metals/Minerals] industry is $2.29B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

CVVUF’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileDBLVF’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • CVVUF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • DBLVF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, CVVUF is a better buy in the long-term than DBLVF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

CVVUF’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while DBLVF’s TA Score has 7 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • CVVUF’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 3 bearish.
  • DBLVF’s TA Score: 7 bullish, 3 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, DBLVF is a better buy in the short-term than CVVUF.

Price Growth

CVVUF (@Other Metals/Minerals) experienced а -1.52% price change this week, while DBLVF (@Other Metals/Minerals) price change was -2.36% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Other Metals/Minerals industry was +4.20%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +9.25%, and the average quarterly price growth was +55.53%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Other Metals/Minerals (+4.20% weekly)

The category includes companies that explore for, mine and extract metals, such as copper, diamonds, nickel, cobalt ore, lead, zinc and uranium. BHP, Rio Tinto and Southern Copper Corporation are major players in this space.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CVVUF($121M) has a higher market cap than DBLVF($95.3M). DBLVF YTD gains are higher at: 72.763 vs. CVVUF (30.745). DBLVF has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): -2.84M vs. CVVUF (-9.86M). CVVUF has more cash in the bank: 26.3M vs. DBLVF (4.22M). CVVUF (0) and DBLVF (0) have equivalent revenues.
CVVUFDBLVFCVVUF / DBLVF
Capitalization121M95.3M127%
EBITDA-9.86M-2.84M347%
Gain YTD30.74572.76342%
P/E RatioN/AN/A-
Revenue00-
Total Cash26.3M4.22M623%
Total Debt711KN/A-
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
CVVUF vs DBLVF: Fundamental Ratings
CVVUF
DBLVF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
5050
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
68
Overvalued
51
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
4078
SMR RATING
1..100
9895
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
5046
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
100100
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
5050

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

DBLVF's Valuation (51) in the null industry is in the same range as CVVUF (68). This means that DBLVF’s stock grew similarly to CVVUF’s over the last 12 months.

CVVUF's Profit vs Risk Rating (40) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for DBLVF (78). This means that CVVUF’s stock grew somewhat faster than DBLVF’s over the last 12 months.

DBLVF's SMR Rating (95) in the null industry is in the same range as CVVUF (98). This means that DBLVF’s stock grew similarly to CVVUF’s over the last 12 months.

DBLVF's Price Growth Rating (46) in the null industry is in the same range as CVVUF (50). This means that DBLVF’s stock grew similarly to CVVUF’s over the last 12 months.

DBLVF's P/E Growth Rating (100) in the null industry is in the same range as CVVUF (100). This means that DBLVF’s stock grew similarly to CVVUF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
CVVUFDBLVF
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
90%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
90%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
83%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
90%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
85%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
86%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
85%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
87%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
78%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
79%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
80%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
87%
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
79%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 19 days ago
83%
Bearish Trend 11 days ago
89%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
90%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
78%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
CVVUF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
DBLVF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
HBCYF13.020.32
+2.56%
HSBC Holdings Plc
AGRPY20.63N/A
+0.02%
Absa Group Ltd.
CHHGF0.21N/A
N/A
Chen Hsong Holdings Ltd.
NNMTF0.95N/A
N/A
Nine Entertainment Co. Holdings Ltd
CRSXQ0.15N/A
N/A
Corsa Coal Corp.

CVVUF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that CVVUF and CGMLF have been poorly correlated (+25% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that CVVUF and CGMLF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To CVVUF
1D Price
Change %
CVVUF100%
-1.37%
CGMLF - CVVUF
25%
Poorly correlated
+0.36%
LIFFF - CVVUF
24%
Poorly correlated
N/A
QUEXF - CVVUF
23%
Poorly correlated
-0.13%
KLDCF - CVVUF
21%
Poorly correlated
+2.08%
DBLVF - CVVUF
3%
Poorly correlated
-6.36%
More

DBLVF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that DBLVF and FSUMF have been poorly correlated (+21% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that DBLVF and FSUMF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To DBLVF
1D Price
Change %
DBLVF100%
-6.36%
FSUMF - DBLVF
21%
Poorly correlated
N/A
DAUGF - DBLVF
5%
Poorly correlated
N/A
CVVUF - DBLVF
3%
Poorly correlated
-1.37%
DCNNF - DBLVF
3%
Poorly correlated
+23.08%
CXOXF - DBLVF
2%
Poorly correlated
-8.85%
More