CVVUF
Price
$0.64
Change
-$0.04 (-5.88%)
Updated
Oct 17 closing price
Capitalization
126.04M
CXOXF
Price
$0.09
Change
-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Updated
Oct 17 closing price
Capitalization
225.06M
Interact to see
Advertisement

CVVUF vs CXOXF

Header iconCVVUF vs CXOXF Comparison
Open Charts CVVUF vs CXOXFBanner chart's image
CanAlaska Uranium
Price$0.64
Change-$0.04 (-5.88%)
Volume$212.67K
Capitalization126.04M
Core Lithium
Price$0.09
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Volume$3.5K
Capitalization225.06M
CVVUF vs CXOXF Comparison Chart in %
CVVUF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
CXOXF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
CVVUF vs. CXOXF commentary
Oct 18, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CVVUF is a Hold and CXOXF is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Oct 18, 2025
Stock price -- (CVVUF: $0.64 vs. CXOXF: $0.09)
Brand notoriety: CVVUF and CXOXF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Other Metals/Minerals industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: CVVUF: 131% vs. CXOXF: 6%
Market capitalization -- CVVUF: $126.04M vs. CXOXF: $225.06M
CVVUF [@Other Metals/Minerals] is valued at $126.04M. CXOXF’s [@Other Metals/Minerals] market capitalization is $225.06M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Other Metals/Minerals] industry ranges from $223.12B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Other Metals/Minerals] industry is $2.65B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

CVVUF’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileCXOXF’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • CVVUF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • CXOXF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, CXOXF is a better buy in the long-term than CVVUF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

CVVUF’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while CXOXF’s TA Score has 6 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • CVVUF’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 6 bearish.
  • CXOXF’s TA Score: 6 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, CXOXF is a better buy in the short-term than CVVUF.

Price Growth

CVVUF (@Other Metals/Minerals) experienced а -9.10% price change this week, while CXOXF (@Other Metals/Minerals) price change was +40.89% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Other Metals/Minerals industry was +3.05%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +27.21%, and the average quarterly price growth was +253.12%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Other Metals/Minerals (+3.05% weekly)

The category includes companies that explore for, mine and extract metals, such as copper, diamonds, nickel, cobalt ore, lead, zinc and uranium. BHP, Rio Tinto and Southern Copper Corporation are major players in this space.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CXOXF($225M) has a higher market cap than CVVUF($126M). CXOXF YTD gains are higher at: 93.608 vs. CVVUF (29.647). CVVUF has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): -13.36M vs. CXOXF (-47.88M).
CVVUFCXOXFCVVUF / CXOXF
Capitalization126M225M56%
EBITDA-13.36M-47.88M28%
Gain YTD29.64793.60832%
P/E RatioN/AN/A-
Revenue0N/A-
Total Cash20.8MN/A-
Total Debt658KN/A-
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
CVVUF vs CXOXF: Fundamental Ratings
CVVUF
CXOXF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
8128
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
68
Overvalued
35
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
4497
SMR RATING
1..100
9996
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
5137
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
100100
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
9050

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

CXOXF's Valuation (35) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for CVVUF (68). This means that CXOXF’s stock grew somewhat faster than CVVUF’s over the last 12 months.

CVVUF's Profit vs Risk Rating (44) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for CXOXF (97). This means that CVVUF’s stock grew somewhat faster than CXOXF’s over the last 12 months.

CXOXF's SMR Rating (96) in the null industry is in the same range as CVVUF (99). This means that CXOXF’s stock grew similarly to CVVUF’s over the last 12 months.

CXOXF's Price Growth Rating (37) in the null industry is in the same range as CVVUF (51). This means that CXOXF’s stock grew similarly to CVVUF’s over the last 12 months.

CXOXF's P/E Growth Rating (100) in the null industry is in the same range as CVVUF (100). This means that CXOXF’s stock grew similarly to CVVUF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
CVVUFCXOXF
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
87%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
87%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
90%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
90%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
83%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
86%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
78%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
89%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
81%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
77%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
78%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
80%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 19 days ago
87%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
77%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
82%
Bearish Trend 18 days ago
90%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
90%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
90%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
82%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
90%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
CVVUF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
CXOXF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
VGIRX16.460.06
+0.37%
Virtus Duff & Phelps Global Infras R6
HIGUX22.450.05
+0.22%
Carillon Eagle Growth & Income R6
RYWAX55.020.07
+0.13%
Rydex S&P SmallCap 600 Pure Growth H
VMFGX470.840.59
+0.13%
Vanguard S&P Mid-Cap 400 Growth Idx I
COAVX14.18-0.05
-0.35%
Columbia Overseas Value A

CVVUF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that CVVUF and CGMLF have been poorly correlated (+26% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that CVVUF and CGMLF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To CVVUF
1D Price
Change %
CVVUF100%
-4.79%
CGMLF - CVVUF
26%
Poorly correlated
N/A
LIFFF - CVVUF
23%
Poorly correlated
-16.55%
KLDCF - CVVUF
21%
Poorly correlated
-4.62%
DAUGF - CVVUF
3%
Poorly correlated
N/A
CXOXF - CVVUF
3%
Poorly correlated
+2.85%
More

CXOXF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that CXOXF and OMZNF have been poorly correlated (+23% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that CXOXF and OMZNF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To CXOXF
1D Price
Change %
CXOXF100%
+2.85%
OMZNF - CXOXF
23%
Poorly correlated
-3.13%
DAUGF - CXOXF
13%
Poorly correlated
N/A
DBLVF - CXOXF
9%
Poorly correlated
-2.81%
CVVUF - CXOXF
3%
Poorly correlated
-4.79%
CTXDF - CXOXF
-0%
Poorly correlated
-3.77%
More