Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CVTRX vs RGNBX
CVTRX vs RGNBX Comparison
Open Charts CVTRX vs RGNBX
Calamos Growth & Income A
Price$54.27
Change-$2.12 (-3.76%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets3.27B
American Funds Growth and Inc Port R2
Price$21.50
Change-$0.17 (-0.78%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets21.95B
CVTRX vs RGNBX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CVTRX vs. RGNBX commentary
Feb 05, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CVTRX is a StrongBuy and RGNBX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RGNBX has more cash in the bank: 21.9B vs. CVTRX (3.27B). RGNBX pays higher dividends than CVTRX: RGNBX (0.99) vs CVTRX (0.33). CVTRX was incepted earlier than RGNBX: CVTRX (37 years) vs RGNBX (14 years). RGNBX (1.40) is less costly to investors than CVTRX (1.05). CVTRX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 36.00 vs. RGNBX (10.00). RGNBX has a lower initial minimum investment than CVTRX: RGNBX (250) vs CVTRX (2500). RGNBX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 11.99 vs. CVTRX (9.49). CVTRX return over 5 years is better than : 32.09 vs. RGNBX (27.42).
| CVTRX | RGNBX | CVTRX / RGNBX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.05 | 1.40 | 75% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.05 | 1.40 | 75% |
| Fund Existence | 37 years | 14 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 1.973 | 2.041 | 97% |
| Front Load | 5% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2500 | 250 | 1,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 3.27B | 21.9B | 15% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.33 | 0.99 | 34% |
| Returns for 1 year | 9.49 | 11.99 | 79% |
| Returns for 3 years | 41.37 | 40.43 | 102% |
| Returns for 5 years | 32.09 | 27.42 | 117% |
| Returns for 10 years | 121.98 | 87.66 | 139% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers