Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CVTCX vs RGQFX
CVTCX vs RGQFX Comparison
Open Charts CVTCX vs RGQFX
Calamos Growth & Income C
Price$55.74
Change+$0.10 (+0.18%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets3.22B
American Funds Growth and Inc Port R5E
Price$21.75
Change+$0.02 (+0.09%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets21.43B
CVTCX vs RGQFX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CVTCX vs. RGQFX commentary
Oct 19, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CVTCX is a StrongBuy and RGQFX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RGQFX has more cash in the bank: 21.4B vs. CVTCX (3.22B). RGQFX pays higher dividends than CVTCX: RGQFX (1.76) vs CVTCX (0.24). CVTCX was incepted earlier than RGQFX: CVTCX (29 years) vs RGQFX (10 years). CVTCX (1.80) is less costly to investors than RGQFX (0.47). CVTCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 28.00 vs. RGQFX (10.00). RGQFX has a lower initial minimum investment than CVTCX: RGQFX (250) vs CVTCX (2500). CVTCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 11.67 vs. RGQFX (11.04). CVTCX (44.96) and RGQFX (42.85) have equivalent 5 years return.
| CVTCX | RGQFX | CVTCX / RGQFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.80 | 0.47 | 383% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.80 | 0.47 | 383% |
| Fund Existence | 29 years | 10 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 14.362 | 15.586 | 92% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2500 | 250 | 1,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 3.22B | 21.4B | 15% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.24 | 1.76 | 14% |
| Returns for 1 year | 11.67 | 11.04 | 106% |
| Returns for 3 years | 50.01 | 54.04 | 93% |
| Returns for 5 years | 44.96 | 42.85 | 105% |
| Returns for 10 years | 89.31 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement