Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CVTCX vs RGNBX
CVTCX vs RGNBX Comparison
Open Charts CVTCX vs RGNBX
Calamos Growth & Income C
Price$53.78
Change+$0.14 (+0.26%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets3.27B
American Funds Growth and Inc Port R2
Price$22.19
Change+$0.05 (+0.23%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets21.95B
CVTCX vs RGNBX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CVTCX vs. RGNBX commentary
Dec 27, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CVTCX is a Hold and RGNBX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RGNBX has more cash in the bank: 21.9B vs. CVTCX (3.27B). RGNBX pays higher dividends than CVTCX: RGNBX (0.93) vs CVTCX (0.24). CVTCX was incepted earlier than RGNBX: CVTCX (29 years) vs RGNBX (14 years). CVTCX (1.80) is less costly to investors than RGNBX (1.40). CVTCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 28.00 vs. RGNBX (10.00). RGNBX has a lower initial minimum investment than CVTCX: RGNBX (250) vs CVTCX (2500). RGNBX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 13.08 vs. CVTCX (7.78). RGNBX return over 5 years is better than : 35.88 vs. CVTCX (32.63).
| CVTCX | RGNBX | CVTCX / RGNBX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.80 | 1.40 | 129% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.80 | 1.40 | 129% |
| Fund Existence | 29 years | 14 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 10.341 | 18.172 | 57% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2500 | 250 | 1,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 3.27B | 21.9B | 15% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.24 | 0.93 | 26% |
| Returns for 1 year | 7.78 | 13.08 | 59% |
| Returns for 3 years | 46.35 | 45.28 | 102% |
| Returns for 5 years | 32.63 | 35.88 | 91% |
| Returns for 10 years | 88.92 | 75.21 | 118% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers