CVR
Price
$12.25
Change
-$0.10 (-0.81%)
Updated
Jun 30, 03:25 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
16.42M
FLS
Price
$52.36
Change
-$1.28 (-2.39%)
Updated
Jun 30, 04:59 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
5.99B
31 days until earnings call
Interact to see
Advertisement

CVR vs FLS

Header iconCVR vs FLS Comparison
Open Charts CVR vs FLSBanner chart's image
Chicago Rivet & Machine
Price$12.25
Change-$0.10 (-0.81%)
Volume$343
Capitalization16.42M
Flowserve
Price$52.36
Change-$1.28 (-2.39%)
Volume$40.6K
Capitalization5.99B
CVR vs FLS Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
CVR
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
FLS
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
CVR vs. FLS commentary
Jul 01, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CVR is a Hold and FLS is a Buy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jul 01, 2025
Stock price -- (CVR: $12.35 vs. FLS: $53.64)
Brand notoriety: CVR and FLS are both not notable
Both companies represent the Industrial Machinery industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: CVR: 207% vs. FLS: 415%
Market capitalization -- CVR: $16.42M vs. FLS: $5.99B
CVR [@Industrial Machinery] is valued at $16.42M. FLS’s [@Industrial Machinery] market capitalization is $5.99B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Industrial Machinery] industry ranges from $135.33B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Industrial Machinery] industry is $9.41B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

CVR’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileFLS’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • CVR’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
  • FLS’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, FLS is a better buy in the long-term than CVR.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

CVR’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish while FLS’s TA Score has 5 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • CVR’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • FLS’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 5 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, CVR is a better buy in the short-term than FLS.

Price Growth

CVR (@Industrial Machinery) experienced а +7.11% price change this week, while FLS (@Industrial Machinery) price change was +17.08% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Industrial Machinery industry was +4.90%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +5.51%, and the average quarterly price growth was +9.11%.

Reported Earning Dates

FLS is expected to report earnings on Jul 31, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Industrial Machinery (+4.90% weekly)

The industry makes and maintains machines for consumers, the industry, and most other companies. While it has traditionally been categorized as heavy industry, some smaller companies are also branching into the light category. The industry is pivotal in providing the equipment for production in businesses like agriculture, mining, industry and construction, gas, electricity and water utilities. It also supplies supporting equipment for almost all sectors of the economy, such as equipment for heating, and air conditioning of buildings. Illinois Tool Works Inc., Parker-Hannifin Corporation and Rockwell Automation Inc are some of the major U.S. companies operating in this industry.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FLS($5.99B) has a higher market cap than CVR($16.4M). CVR has higher P/E ratio than FLS: CVR (44.24) vs FLS (32.38). FLS YTD gains are higher at: -5.975 vs. CVR (-21.691). FLS has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 374M vs. CVR (-4.25M). CVR has less debt than FLS: CVR (283K) vs FLS (1.41B). FLS has higher revenues than CVR: FLS (4.32B) vs CVR (31.6M).
CVRFLSCVR / FLS
Capitalization16.4M5.99B0%
EBITDA-4.25M374M-1%
Gain YTD-21.691-5.975363%
P/E Ratio44.2432.38137%
Revenue31.6M4.32B1%
Total CashN/A546M-
Total Debt283K1.41B0%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
CVR vs FLS: Fundamental Ratings
CVR
FLS
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
5050
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
30
Undervalued
55
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
10035
SMR RATING
1..100
9457
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
6150
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
1663
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/an/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

CVR's Valuation (30) in the Metal Fabrication industry is in the same range as FLS (55) in the Industrial Machinery industry. This means that CVR’s stock grew similarly to FLS’s over the last 12 months.

FLS's Profit vs Risk Rating (35) in the Industrial Machinery industry is somewhat better than the same rating for CVR (100) in the Metal Fabrication industry. This means that FLS’s stock grew somewhat faster than CVR’s over the last 12 months.

FLS's SMR Rating (57) in the Industrial Machinery industry is somewhat better than the same rating for CVR (94) in the Metal Fabrication industry. This means that FLS’s stock grew somewhat faster than CVR’s over the last 12 months.

FLS's Price Growth Rating (50) in the Industrial Machinery industry is in the same range as CVR (61) in the Metal Fabrication industry. This means that FLS’s stock grew similarly to CVR’s over the last 12 months.

CVR's P/E Growth Rating (16) in the Metal Fabrication industry is somewhat better than the same rating for FLS (63) in the Industrial Machinery industry. This means that CVR’s stock grew somewhat faster than FLS’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
CVRFLS
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
53%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
67%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
72%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
59%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
58%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
80%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
63%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
73%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
68%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
72%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
68%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
69%
Advances
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
71%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
55%
Bearish Trend 20 days ago
59%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
74%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
51%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
80%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
48%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
CVR
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
FLS
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
RICCX62.310.41
+0.66%
American Funds Invmt Co of Amer R3
WFTDX13.180.08
+0.61%
Allspring Innovation Fund - Class Admin
MEFAX12.960.03
+0.23%
MassMutual Mid Cap Growth A
RAPCX10.80-0.02
-0.18%
Cohen & Steers Real Assets C
MLOCX8.60-0.03
-0.35%
Cohen & Steers Future of Energy C

CVR and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that CVR and MIR have been poorly correlated (+27% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that CVR and MIR's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To CVR
1D Price
Change %
CVR100%
-0.40%
MIR - CVR
27%
Poorly correlated
+0.84%
GTES - CVR
24%
Poorly correlated
+2.35%
GRC - CVR
23%
Poorly correlated
+0.03%
FLS - CVR
23%
Poorly correlated
+3.81%
KRNT - CVR
23%
Poorly correlated
+1.64%
More

FLS and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, FLS has been closely correlated with ITT. These tickers have moved in lockstep 82% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if FLS jumps, then ITT could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To FLS
1D Price
Change %
FLS100%
+3.81%
ITT - FLS
82%
Closely correlated
+0.25%
PH - FLS
79%
Closely correlated
+1.28%
DOV - FLS
78%
Closely correlated
+0.14%
EMR - FLS
77%
Closely correlated
+0.33%
GTLS - FLS
76%
Closely correlated
+3.32%
More