Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CVQZX vs RMFCX
CVQZX vs RMFCX Comparison
Open Charts CVQZX vs RMFCX
Columbia Disciplined Value Inst
Price$9.33
Change-$0.04 (-0.43%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets176.61M
American Funds American Mutual R3
Price$60.38
Change-$0.07 (-0.12%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets109.46B
CVQZX vs RMFCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CVQZX vs. RMFCX commentary
Sep 09, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CVQZX is a Buy and RMFCX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RMFCX has more cash in the bank: 109B vs. CVQZX (177M). CVQZX pays higher dividends than RMFCX: CVQZX (1.47) vs RMFCX (1.24). CVQZX was incepted earlier than RMFCX: CVQZX (15 years) vs RMFCX (23 years). CVQZX (0.96) is less costly to investors than RMFCX (0.91). CVQZX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 60.00 vs. RMFCX (31.00). RMFCX has a lower initial minimum investment than CVQZX: RMFCX (250) vs CVQZX (2000). RMFCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 7.71 vs. CVQZX (1.96). RMFCX return over 5 years is better than : 56.41 vs. CVQZX (18.39).
| CVQZX | RMFCX | CVQZX / RMFCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.78 | 0.91 | 86% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.96 | 0.91 | 105% |
| Fund Existence | 15 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 8.985 | 11.421 | 79% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2000 | 250 | 800% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 177M | 109B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.47 | 1.24 | 119% |
| Returns for 1 year | 1.96 | 7.71 | 25% |
| Returns for 3 years | 16.40 | 32.16 | 51% |
| Returns for 5 years | 18.39 | 56.41 | 33% |
| Returns for 10 years | 15.36 | 91.12 | 17% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers