Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CVQZX vs RMFCX
CVQZX vs RMFCX Comparison
Open Charts CVQZX vs RMFCX
Columbia Disciplined Value Inst
Price$9.65
Change+$0.07 (+0.73%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets178.76M
American Funds American Mutual R3
Price$62.49
Change+$0.31 (+0.50%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets111.8B
CVQZX vs RMFCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CVQZX vs. RMFCX commentary
Dec 04, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CVQZX is a Buy and RMFCX is a StrongBuy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RMFCX has more cash in the bank: 112B vs. CVQZX (179M). CVQZX pays higher dividends than RMFCX: CVQZX (1.43) vs RMFCX (1.18). CVQZX was incepted earlier than RMFCX: CVQZX (15 years) vs RMFCX (24 years). CVQZX (0.96) is less costly to investors than RMFCX (0.91). CVQZX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 60.00 vs. RMFCX (31.00). RMFCX has a lower initial minimum investment than CVQZX: RMFCX (250) vs CVQZX (2000). RMFCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 5.51 vs. CVQZX (-4.35). RMFCX return over 5 years is better than : 52.85 vs. CVQZX (11.20).
| CVQZX | RMFCX | CVQZX / RMFCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.78 | 0.91 | 86% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.96 | 0.91 | 105% |
| Fund Existence | 15 years | 24 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 12.135 | 14.983 | 81% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2000 | 250 | 800% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 179M | 112B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.43 | 1.18 | 121% |
| Returns for 1 year | -4.35 | 5.51 | -79% |
| Returns for 3 years | 12.18 | 27.11 | 45% |
| Returns for 5 years | 11.20 | 52.85 | 21% |
| Returns for 10 years | 12.23 | 89.59 | 14% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement