Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CVQZX vs RMEBX
CVQZX vs RMEBX Comparison
Open Charts CVQZX vs RMEBX
Columbia Disciplined Value Inst
Price$9.65
Change+$0.07 (+0.73%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets178.76M
American Funds American Mutual R2E
Price$62.52
Change-$0.03 (-0.05%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets113.34B
CVQZX vs RMEBX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CVQZX vs. RMEBX commentary
Dec 04, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CVQZX is a Buy and RMEBX is a StrongBuy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RMEBX has more cash in the bank: 113B vs. CVQZX (179M). CVQZX pays higher dividends than RMEBX: CVQZX (1.43) vs RMEBX (1.03). CVQZX was incepted earlier than RMEBX: CVQZX (15 years) vs RMEBX (11 years). RMEBX (1.07) is less costly to investors than CVQZX (0.96). CVQZX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 60.00 vs. RMEBX (31.00). RMEBX has a lower initial minimum investment than CVQZX: RMEBX (250) vs CVQZX (2000). RMEBX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 5.38 vs. CVQZX (-4.35). RMEBX return over 5 years is better than : 51.74 vs. CVQZX (11.20).
| CVQZX | RMEBX | CVQZX / RMEBX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.78 | 1.07 | 73% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.96 | 1.07 | 90% |
| Fund Existence | 15 years | 11 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 12.135 | 14.812 | 82% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2000 | 250 | 800% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 179M | 113B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.43 | 1.03 | 138% |
| Returns for 1 year | -4.35 | 5.38 | -81% |
| Returns for 3 years | 12.18 | 26.56 | 46% |
| Returns for 5 years | 11.20 | 51.74 | 22% |
| Returns for 10 years | 12.23 | 87.74 | 14% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement