CVOSF
Price
$5.05
Change
-$0.03 (-0.59%)
Updated
Nov 14 closing price
SPNUF
Price
$2.46
Change
-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Updated
Nov 5 closing price
Ad is loading...

CVOSF vs SPNUF

Header iconCVOSF vs SPNUF Comparison
Open Charts CVOSF vs SPNUFBanner chart's image
COVEO SOLUTIONS
Price$5.05
Change-$0.03 (-0.59%)
Volume$6.55K
CapitalizationN/A
Spirent Communications
Price$2.46
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Volume$500
CapitalizationN/A
CVOSF vs SPNUF Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
CVOSF vs. SPNUF commentary
Nov 15, 2024

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CVOSF is a Hold and SPNUF is a Hold.

COMPARISON
Comparison
Nov 15, 2024
Stock price -- (CVOSF: $5.05 vs. SPNUF: $2.46)
Brand notoriety: CVOSF and SPNUF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Packaged Software industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: CVOSF: 53% vs. SPNUF: 7%
Market capitalization -- CVOSF: $914.57M vs. SPNUF: $1.28B
CVOSF [@Packaged Software] is valued at $914.57M. SPNUF’s [@Packaged Software] market capitalization is $1.28B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Packaged Software] industry ranges from $3.15T to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Packaged Software] industry is $11.37B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

CVOSF’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileSPNUF’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • CVOSF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • SPNUF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, SPNUF is a better buy in the long-term than CVOSF.

Price Growth

CVOSF (@Packaged Software) experienced а -2.88% price change this week, while SPNUF (@Packaged Software) price change was 0.00% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Packaged Software industry was +0.05%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +4.87%, and the average quarterly price growth was +3.96%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Packaged Software (+0.05% weekly)

Packaged software comprises multiple software programs bundled together and sold as a group. For example, Microsoft Office includes multiple applications such as Excel, Word, and PowerPoint. In some cases, buying a bundled product is cheaper than purchasing each item individually[s20] . Microsoft Corporation, Oracle Corp. and Adobe are some major American packaged software makers.

FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
SPNUF($1.28B) has a higher market cap than CVOSF($915M). SPNUF YTD gains are higher at: 48.193 vs. CVOSF (-32.756). SPNUF has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 135M vs. CVOSF (-30.32M). CVOSF (198M) and SPNUF (189M) have equal amount of cash in the bank . CVOSF has less debt than SPNUF: CVOSF (10.9M) vs SPNUF (25.5M). SPNUF has higher revenues than CVOSF: SPNUF (601M) vs CVOSF (112M).
CVOSFSPNUFCVOSF / SPNUF
Capitalization915M1.28B71%
EBITDA-30.32M135M-22%
Gain YTD-32.75648.193-68%
P/E RatioN/A13.44-
Revenue112M601M19%
Total Cash198M189M105%
Total Debt10.9M25.5M43%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
SPNUF: Fundamental Ratings
SPNUF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
13
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
75
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
100
SMR RATING
1..100
45
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
42
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
16
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
50

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
RSI
ODDS (%)
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Momentum
ODDS (%)
MACD
ODDS (%)
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Advances
ODDS (%)
Declines
ODDS (%)
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Aroon
ODDS (%)
View a ticker or compare two or three
Ad is loading...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
GME27.370.91
+3.44%
GameStop Corp
AAPL228.223.10
+1.38%
Apple
SPY593.35-3.84
-0.64%
SPDR® S&P 500® ETF Trust
BTC.X87250.430000-3333.734400
-3.68%
Bitcoin cryptocurrency
TSLA311.18-19.06
-5.77%
Tesla

CVOSF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, CVOSF has been loosely correlated with SPMYY. These tickers have moved in lockstep 55% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if CVOSF jumps, then SPMYY could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To CVOSF
1D Price
Change %
CVOSF100%
-0.59%
SPMYY - CVOSF
55%
Loosely correlated
N/A
SPNUF - CVOSF
55%
Loosely correlated
N/A
NVEI - CVOSF
42%
Loosely correlated
-0.03%
VERB - CVOSF
39%
Loosely correlated
-10.52%
NPACY - CVOSF
26%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More

SPNUF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, SPNUF has been closely correlated with SPMYY. These tickers have moved in lockstep 82% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if SPNUF jumps, then SPMYY could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To SPNUF
1D Price
Change %
SPNUF100%
N/A
SPMYY - SPNUF
82%
Closely correlated
N/A
VERB - SPNUF
58%
Loosely correlated
-11.27%
CVOSF - SPNUF
54%
Loosely correlated
N/A
STRM - SPNUF
42%
Loosely correlated
-8.81%
NVEI - SPNUF
34%
Loosely correlated
+1.25%
More