CVOSF
Price
$5.05
Change
-$0.03 (-0.59%)
Updated
Nov 14 closing price
NPACY
Price
$1.01
Change
-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Updated
Oct 28 closing price
Ad is loading...

CVOSF vs NPACY

Header iconCVOSF vs NPACY Comparison
Open Charts CVOSF vs NPACYBanner chart's image
COVEO SOLUTIONS
Price$5.05
Change-$0.03 (-0.59%)
Volume$6.55K
CapitalizationN/A
Quadient SA
Price$1.01
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Volume$7.5K
CapitalizationN/A
CVOSF vs NPACY Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
CVOSF vs. NPACY commentary
Nov 15, 2024

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CVOSF is a Hold and NPACY is a Hold.

COMPARISON
Comparison
Nov 15, 2024
Stock price -- (CVOSF: $5.05 vs. NPACY: $1.01)
Brand notoriety: CVOSF and NPACY are both not notable
Both companies represent the Packaged Software industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: CVOSF: 53% vs. NPACY: 103%
Market capitalization -- CVOSF: $914.57M vs. NPACY: $767.63M
CVOSF [@Packaged Software] is valued at $914.57M. NPACY’s [@Packaged Software] market capitalization is $767.63M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Packaged Software] industry ranges from $3.15T to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Packaged Software] industry is $11.37B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

CVOSF’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileNPACY’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • CVOSF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • NPACY’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, CVOSF is a better buy in the long-term than NPACY.

Price Growth

CVOSF (@Packaged Software) experienced а -2.88% price change this week, while NPACY (@Packaged Software) price change was 0.00% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Packaged Software industry was +0.05%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +4.87%, and the average quarterly price growth was +3.96%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Packaged Software (+0.05% weekly)

Packaged software comprises multiple software programs bundled together and sold as a group. For example, Microsoft Office includes multiple applications such as Excel, Word, and PowerPoint. In some cases, buying a bundled product is cheaper than purchasing each item individually[s20] . Microsoft Corporation, Oracle Corp. and Adobe are some major American packaged software makers.

FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CVOSF($915M) has a higher market cap than NPACY($768M). NPACY YTD gains are higher at: -18.876 vs. CVOSF (-32.756). NPACY has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 228M vs. CVOSF (-30.32M). CVOSF has more cash in the bank: 198M vs. NPACY (133M). CVOSF has less debt than NPACY: CVOSF (10.9M) vs NPACY (910M). NPACY has higher revenues than CVOSF: NPACY (1.04B) vs CVOSF (112M).
CVOSFNPACYCVOSF / NPACY
Capitalization915M768M119%
EBITDA-30.32M228M-13%
Gain YTD-32.756-18.876174%
P/E RatioN/A10.98-
Revenue112M1.04B11%
Total Cash198M133M149%
Total Debt10.9M910M1%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
NPACY: Fundamental Ratings
NPACY
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
26
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
3
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
100
SMR RATING
1..100
83
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
83
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
81
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
50

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
RSI
ODDS (%)
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Momentum
ODDS (%)
MACD
ODDS (%)
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Advances
ODDS (%)
Declines
ODDS (%)
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Aroon
ODDS (%)
View a ticker or compare two or three
Ad is loading...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
GME27.370.91
+3.44%
GameStop Corp
AAPL228.223.10
+1.38%
Apple
SPY593.35-3.84
-0.64%
SPDR® S&P 500® ETF Trust
BTC.X87250.430000-3333.734400
-3.68%
Bitcoin cryptocurrency
TSLA311.18-19.06
-5.77%
Tesla

CVOSF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, CVOSF has been loosely correlated with SPMYY. These tickers have moved in lockstep 55% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if CVOSF jumps, then SPMYY could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To CVOSF
1D Price
Change %
CVOSF100%
-0.59%
SPMYY - CVOSF
55%
Loosely correlated
N/A
SPNUF - CVOSF
55%
Loosely correlated
N/A
NVEI - CVOSF
42%
Loosely correlated
-0.03%
VERB - CVOSF
39%
Loosely correlated
-10.52%
NPACY - CVOSF
26%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More

NPACY and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, NPACY has been loosely correlated with ENETF. These tickers have moved in lockstep 37% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if NPACY jumps, then ENETF could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To NPACY
1D Price
Change %
NPACY100%
N/A
ENETF - NPACY
37%
Loosely correlated
N/A
BNAI - NPACY
36%
Loosely correlated
-25.19%
BTRCF - NPACY
29%
Poorly correlated
N/A
CVOSF - NPACY
27%
Poorly correlated
-0.59%
PSSWF - NPACY
23%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More