CVOSF
Price
$4.57
Change
-$0.08 (-1.72%)
Updated
Dec 17 closing price
GCT
Price
$17.93
Change
+$0.21 (+1.19%)
Updated
Dec 20 closing price
81 days until earnings call
Ad is loading...

CVOSF vs GCT

Header iconCVOSF vs GCT Comparison
Open Charts CVOSF vs GCTBanner chart's image
COVEO SOLUTIONS
Price$4.57
Change-$0.08 (-1.72%)
Volume$3K
CapitalizationN/A
GigaCloud Technology
Price$17.93
Change+$0.21 (+1.19%)
Volume$1.07M
CapitalizationN/A
CVOSF vs GCT Comparison Chart
Loading...
GCT
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
CVOSF vs. GCT commentary
Dec 23, 2024

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CVOSF is a Hold and GCT is a Hold.

COMPARISON
Comparison
Dec 23, 2024
Stock price -- (CVOSF: $4.57 vs. GCT: $17.93)
Brand notoriety: CVOSF and GCT are both not notable
Both companies represent the Packaged Software industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: CVOSF: 21% vs. GCT: 77%
Market capitalization -- CVOSF: $914.57M vs. GCT: $1.26B
CVOSF [@Packaged Software] is valued at $914.57M. GCT’s [@Packaged Software] market capitalization is $1.26B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Packaged Software] industry ranges from $3.15T to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Packaged Software] industry is $11.71B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

CVOSF’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileGCT’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • CVOSF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • GCT’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, GCT is a better buy in the long-term than CVOSF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

GCT’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish.

  • GCT’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 6 bearish.

Price Growth

CVOSF (@Packaged Software) experienced а -0.47% price change this week, while GCT (@Packaged Software) price change was -13.34% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Packaged Software industry was +4.24%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +10.60%, and the average quarterly price growth was +21.20%.

Reported Earning Dates

GCT is expected to report earnings on Mar 14, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Packaged Software (+4.24% weekly)

Packaged software comprises multiple software programs bundled together and sold as a group. For example, Microsoft Office includes multiple applications such as Excel, Word, and PowerPoint. In some cases, buying a bundled product is cheaper than purchasing each item individually[s20] . Microsoft Corporation, Oracle Corp. and Adobe are some major American packaged software makers.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
GCT($1.26B) has a higher market cap than CVOSF($915M). GCT YTD gains are higher at: -1.995 vs. CVOSF (-39.169). GCT has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 119M vs. CVOSF (-30.32M). CVOSF has more cash in the bank: 198M vs. GCT (183M). CVOSF has less debt than GCT: CVOSF (10.9M) vs GCT (403M). GCT has higher revenues than CVOSF: GCT (704M) vs CVOSF (112M).
CVOSFGCTCVOSF / GCT
Capitalization915M1.26B73%
EBITDA-30.32M119M-25%
Gain YTD-39.169-1.9951,963%
P/E RatioN/A13.40-
Revenue112M704M16%
Total Cash198M183M108%
Total Debt10.9M403M3%
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
GCT
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
90%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
88%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
86%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
86%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
83%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
81%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 19 days ago
90%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
81%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
73%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
78%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Ad is loading...
GCT
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
GME29.820.82
+2.83%
GameStop Corp
AAPL254.494.70
+1.88%
Apple
SPY591.157.02
+1.20%
SPDR® S&P 500® ETF Trust
BTC.X95104.940000-2119.789000
-2.18%
Bitcoin cryptocurrency
TSLA421.06-15.11
-3.46%
Tesla

CVOSF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, CVOSF has been loosely correlated with SPMYY. These tickers have moved in lockstep 55% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if CVOSF jumps, then SPMYY could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To CVOSF
1D Price
Change %
CVOSF100%
N/A
SPMYY - CVOSF
55%
Loosely correlated
N/A
SPNUF - CVOSF
55%
Loosely correlated
-14.23%
VERB - CVOSF
39%
Loosely correlated
+0.33%
NPACY - CVOSF
26%
Poorly correlated
N/A
GCT - CVOSF
23%
Poorly correlated
+1.19%
More

GCT and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that GCT and PANW have been poorly correlated (+25% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that GCT and PANW's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To GCT
1D Price
Change %
GCT100%
+1.19%
PANW - GCT
25%
Poorly correlated
-1.36%
DGHI - GCT
25%
Poorly correlated
-1.67%
AI - GCT
24%
Poorly correlated
+2.51%
ALRM - GCT
24%
Poorly correlated
-2.18%
CVOSF - GCT
23%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More