Advertisement
CVNA vs RUSHA
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CVNA is a Buy and RUSHA is a Buy.
Long-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
CVNA’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileRUSHA’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).
- CVNA’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
- RUSHA’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
Short-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
CVNA’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish while RUSHA’s TA Score has 6 bullish TA indicator(s).
- CVNA’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 3 bearish.
- RUSHA’s TA Score: 6 bullish, 2 bearish.
Price Growth
CVNA (@Automotive Aftermarket) experienced а -0.86% price change this week, while RUSHA (@Automotive Aftermarket) price change was +4.14% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Automotive Aftermarket industry was -0.81%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -1.53%, and the average quarterly price growth was +2.97%.
Reported Earning Dates
CVNA is expected to report earnings on Oct 30, 2025.
RUSHA is expected to report earnings on Oct 28, 2025.
Industries' Descriptions
@Automotive Aftermarket (-0.81% weekly)The Automotive Aftermarket consists of the manufacturing, remanufacturing, distribution, retailing, and installation of vehicle parts and accessories, after the sale of the automobile by the original equipment manufacturer (OEM) to the consumer. The aftermarket parts many not be manufactured by the OEM. According to a Technavio study, the US automotive parts aftermarket size is estimated to grow by USD 24.33 billion during 2018-2022 (CAGR 3%). Like many other industries, the automotive aftermarket is also being intensely penetrated by the digital boom. The online auto parts sales market is predicted to exceed $13B by 2020 (according to a study by Mirakl).
| CVNA | RUSHA | CVNA / RUSHA | |
| Capitalization | 51.8B | 4.53B | 1,144% |
| EBITDA | 1.86B | 682M | 273% |
| Gain YTD | 84.309 | 7.120 | 1,184% |
| P/E Ratio | 93.24 | 16.55 | 563% |
| Revenue | 16.3B | 7.69B | 212% |
| Total Cash | 2.32B | 211M | 1,101% |
| Total Debt | 6.11B | 1.75B | 348% |
CVNA | RUSHA | ||
|---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 14 | 3 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 80 Overvalued | 35 Fair valued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 68 | 17 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 19 | 57 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 38 | 51 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 11 | 29 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 85 | 50 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
RUSHA's Valuation (35) in the Wholesale Distributors industry is somewhat better than the same rating for CVNA (80) in the Specialty Stores industry. This means that RUSHA’s stock grew somewhat faster than CVNA’s over the last 12 months.
RUSHA's Profit vs Risk Rating (17) in the Wholesale Distributors industry is somewhat better than the same rating for CVNA (68) in the Specialty Stores industry. This means that RUSHA’s stock grew somewhat faster than CVNA’s over the last 12 months.
CVNA's SMR Rating (19) in the Specialty Stores industry is somewhat better than the same rating for RUSHA (57) in the Wholesale Distributors industry. This means that CVNA’s stock grew somewhat faster than RUSHA’s over the last 12 months.
CVNA's Price Growth Rating (38) in the Specialty Stores industry is in the same range as RUSHA (51) in the Wholesale Distributors industry. This means that CVNA’s stock grew similarly to RUSHA’s over the last 12 months.
CVNA's P/E Growth Rating (11) in the Specialty Stores industry is in the same range as RUSHA (29) in the Wholesale Distributors industry. This means that CVNA’s stock grew similarly to RUSHA’s over the last 12 months.
| CVNA | RUSHA | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | N/A | N/A |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 77% | 1 day ago 54% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 84% | 1 day ago 74% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 86% | 1 day ago 65% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 83% | 1 day ago 72% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 85% | 1 day ago 55% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 7 days ago 84% | 3 days ago 72% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 83% | 17 days ago 60% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 83% | 1 day ago 71% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 86% | 1 day ago 67% |
Advertisement
| 1 Day | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| ETFs / NAME | Price $ | Chg $ | Chg % |
| SVIX | 21.03 | 0.31 | +1.50% |
| -1x Short VIX Futures ETF | |||
| QDIV | 35.07 | 0.15 | +0.42% |
| Global X S&P 500® Quality Dividend ETF | |||
| MYMG | 24.77 | N/A | N/A |
| SPDR SSGA My2027 Municipal Bond ETF | |||
| FNDX | 26.20 | -0.03 | -0.12% |
| Schwab Fundamental U.S. Large CompanyETF | |||
| DGCB | 55.31 | -0.11 | -0.19% |
| Dimensional Global Credit ETF | |||
CVNA and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, CVNA has been loosely correlated with ACVA. These tickers have moved in lockstep 52% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if CVNA jumps, then ACVA could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To CVNA | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CVNA | 100% | -0.87% | ||
| ACVA - CVNA | 52% Loosely correlated | +0.69% | ||
| RH - CVNA | 48% Loosely correlated | -2.66% | ||
| AN - CVNA | 48% Loosely correlated | +0.05% | ||
| CARG - CVNA | 45% Loosely correlated | +1.42% | ||
| KMX - CVNA | 43% Loosely correlated | -0.95% | ||
More | ||||
RUSHA and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, RUSHA has been closely correlated with RUSHB. These tickers have moved in lockstep 86% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if RUSHA jumps, then RUSHB could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To RUSHA | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| RUSHA | 100% | -0.41% | ||
| RUSHB - RUSHA | 86% Closely correlated | -0.97% | ||
| AN - RUSHA | 70% Closely correlated | +0.05% | ||
| ABG - RUSHA | 68% Closely correlated | -0.02% | ||
| GPI - RUSHA | 67% Closely correlated | -1.27% | ||
| PAG - RUSHA | 67% Closely correlated | -0.45% | ||
More | ||||