Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CVMIX vs RNWHX
CVMIX vs RNWHX Comparison
Open Charts CVMIX vs RNWHX
Calvert Emerging Markets Equity I
Price$25.38
Change+$2.88 (+12.80%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.49B
American Funds New World R5E
Price$97.53
Change+$2.43 (+2.56%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets75.46B
CVMIX vs RNWHX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CVMIX vs. RNWHX commentary
Feb 04, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CVMIX is a Hold and RNWHX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RNWHX has more cash in the bank: 75.5B vs. CVMIX (1.49B). CVMIX pays higher dividends than RNWHX: CVMIX (2.08) vs RNWHX (1.25). CVMIX was incepted earlier than RNWHX: CVMIX (13 years) vs RNWHX (10 years). CVMIX (1.09) is less costly to investors than RNWHX (0.72). CVMIX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 67.00 vs. RNWHX (46.00). RNWHX has a lower initial minimum investment than CVMIX: RNWHX (250) vs CVMIX (1000000). CVMIX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 49.83 vs. RNWHX (27.68). CVMIX return over 5 years is better than : 12.57 vs. RNWHX (11.69).
| CVMIX | RNWHX | CVMIX / RNWHX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.03 | 0.72 | 143% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.09 | 0.72 | 151% |
| Fund Existence | 13 years | 10 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 10.252 | 6.092 | 168% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000000 | 250 | 400,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.49B | 75.5B | 2% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 2.08 | 1.25 | 166% |
| Returns for 1 year | 49.83 | 27.68 | 180% |
| Returns for 3 years | 52.73 | 43.24 | 122% |
| Returns for 5 years | 12.57 | 11.69 | 108% |
| Returns for 10 years | 157.17 | 124.21 | 127% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers