Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CVMCX vs RNWHX
CVMCX vs RNWHX Comparison
Open Charts CVMCX vs RNWHX
Calvert Emerging Markets Equity C
Price$21.66
Change+$0.04 (+0.19%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.36B
American Funds New World R5E
Price$92.12
Change+$0.22 (+0.24%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets75.3B
CVMCX vs RNWHX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CVMCX vs. RNWHX commentary
Dec 27, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CVMCX is a Hold and RNWHX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RNWHX has more cash in the bank: 75.3B vs. CVMCX (1.36B). RNWHX pays higher dividends than CVMCX: RNWHX (0.91) vs CVMCX (0.00). CVMCX was incepted earlier than RNWHX: CVMCX (13 years) vs RNWHX (10 years). CVMCX (2.09) is less costly to investors than RNWHX (0.72). CVMCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 67.00 vs. RNWHX (37.00). RNWHX has a lower initial minimum investment than CVMCX: RNWHX (250) vs CVMCX (1000). CVMCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 29.08 vs. RNWHX (18.96). RNWHX return over 5 years is better than : 11.37 vs. CVMCX (4.18).
| CVMCX | RNWHX | CVMCX / RNWHX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 2.03 | 0.72 | 282% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 2.09 | 0.72 | 290% |
| Fund Existence | 13 years | 10 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 31.912 | 20.889 | 153% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 250 | 400% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.36B | 75.3B | 2% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.91 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 29.08 | 18.96 | 153% |
| Returns for 3 years | 44.11 | 44.08 | 100% |
| Returns for 5 years | 4.18 | 11.37 | 37% |
| Returns for 10 years | 91.62 | 90.22 | 102% |