Advertisement
CVLT vs PINC
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CVLT is a StrongBuy and PINC is a StrongBuy.
Long-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
CVLT’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whilePINC’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).
- CVLT’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
- PINC’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
Short-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
CVLT’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish while PINC’s TA Score has 1 bullish TA indicator(s).
- CVLT’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 5 bearish.
- PINC’s TA Score: 1 bullish, 0 bearish.
Price Growth
CVLT (@Packaged Software) experienced а -8.27% price change this week, while PINC (@Services to the Health Industry) price change was 0.00% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Packaged Software industry was -7.06%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -5.61%, and the average quarterly price growth was +165.15%.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Services to the Health Industry industry was -4.74%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -8.76%, and the average quarterly price growth was -7.84%.
Reported Earning Dates
CVLT is expected to report earnings on May 05, 2026.
PINC is expected to report earnings on Feb 10, 2026.
Industries' Descriptions
@Packaged Software (-7.06% weekly)Packaged software comprises multiple software programs bundled together and sold as a group. For example, Microsoft Office includes multiple applications such as Excel, Word, and PowerPoint. In some cases, buying a bundled product is cheaper than purchasing each item individually[s20] . Microsoft Corporation, Oracle Corp. and Adobe are some major American packaged software makers.
@Services to the Health Industry (-4.74% weekly)This industry comprises companies that provide services, such as equipment sterilization, research, physician management systems and consulting, that support the healthcare/medical industry. Examples of such companies include Laboratory Corporation of America Holdings, which operates one of the largest clinical laboratory networks in the world; Quest Diagnostics Inc., which is a clinical laboratory; and Syneos Health, which is a major clinical research organization.
| CVLT | PINC | CVLT / PINC | |
| Capitalization | 3.6B | 2.34B | 154% |
| EBITDA | 97.7M | 233M | 42% |
| Gain YTD | -34.780 | 0.000 | - |
| P/E Ratio | 42.58 | 166.24 | 26% |
| Revenue | 1.1B | 1.01B | 108% |
| Total Cash | 1.06B | 83.7M | 1,271% |
| Total Debt | 908M | 282M | 322% |
CVLT | PINC | ||
|---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 5 | 50 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 87 Overvalued | 15 Undervalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 83 | 100 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 29 | 89 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 93 | 49 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 49 | 2 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 75 | 50 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
PINC's Valuation (15) in the Hospital Or Nursing Management industry is significantly better than the same rating for CVLT (87) in the Packaged Software industry. This means that PINC’s stock grew significantly faster than CVLT’s over the last 12 months.
CVLT's Profit vs Risk Rating (83) in the Packaged Software industry is in the same range as PINC (100) in the Hospital Or Nursing Management industry. This means that CVLT’s stock grew similarly to PINC’s over the last 12 months.
CVLT's SMR Rating (29) in the Packaged Software industry is somewhat better than the same rating for PINC (89) in the Hospital Or Nursing Management industry. This means that CVLT’s stock grew somewhat faster than PINC’s over the last 12 months.
PINC's Price Growth Rating (49) in the Hospital Or Nursing Management industry is somewhat better than the same rating for CVLT (93) in the Packaged Software industry. This means that PINC’s stock grew somewhat faster than CVLT’s over the last 12 months.
PINC's P/E Growth Rating (2) in the Hospital Or Nursing Management industry is somewhat better than the same rating for CVLT (49) in the Packaged Software industry. This means that PINC’s stock grew somewhat faster than CVLT’s over the last 12 months.
| CVLT | PINC | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 71% | N/A |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 69% | N/A |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 64% | N/A |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 60% | N/A |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 63% | 2 days ago 47% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 61% | 2 days ago 44% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 10 days ago 68% | N/A |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 6 days ago 62% | N/A |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 66% | N/A |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 69% | 3 days ago 38% |
Advertisement
CVLT and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, CVLT has been loosely correlated with SNPS. These tickers have moved in lockstep 64% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if CVLT jumps, then SNPS could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To CVLT | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CVLT | 100% | -6.40% | ||
| SNPS - CVLT | 64% Loosely correlated | -8.46% | ||
| FFIV - CVLT | 60% Loosely correlated | -2.17% | ||
| CDNS - CVLT | 60% Loosely correlated | -7.15% | ||
| CRWD - CVLT | 58% Loosely correlated | -3.90% | ||
| CYBR - CVLT | 57% Loosely correlated | -4.82% | ||
More | ||||
PINC and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, PINC has been loosely correlated with GDC. These tickers have moved in lockstep 61% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if PINC jumps, then GDC could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To PINC | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| PINC | 100% | N/A | ||
| GDC - PINC | 61% Loosely correlated | -6.30% | ||
| TDC - PINC | 38% Loosely correlated | -7.10% | ||
| DOX - PINC | 36% Loosely correlated | -8.63% | ||
| CVLT - PINC | 35% Loosely correlated | -6.40% | ||
| MQ - PINC | 33% Loosely correlated | -3.61% | ||
More | ||||