CVLG
Price
$23.83
Change
-$0.43 (-1.77%)
Updated
Aug 15 closing price
Capitalization
596.22M
60 days until earnings call
YGMZ
Price
$0.80
Change
+$0.02 (+2.56%)
Updated
Aug 15 closing price
Capitalization
61.34M
Interact to see
Advertisement

CVLG vs YGMZ

Header iconCVLG vs YGMZ Comparison
Open Charts CVLG vs YGMZBanner chart's image
Covenant Logistics Group
Price$23.83
Change-$0.43 (-1.77%)
Volume$52.74K
Capitalization596.22M
MingZhu Logistics Holdings
Price$0.80
Change+$0.02 (+2.56%)
Volume$1.86K
Capitalization61.34M
CVLG vs YGMZ Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
CVLG
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
YGMZ
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
CVLG vs. YGMZ commentary
Aug 18, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CVLG is a Hold and YGMZ is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Aug 18, 2025
Stock price -- (CVLG: $23.83 vs. YGMZ: $0.80)
Brand notoriety: CVLG and YGMZ are both not notable
Both companies represent the Trucking industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: CVLG: 43% vs. YGMZ: 2%
Market capitalization -- CVLG: $596.22M vs. YGMZ: $61.34M
CVLG [@Trucking] is valued at $596.22M. YGMZ’s [@Trucking] market capitalization is $61.34M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Trucking] industry ranges from $31.76B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Trucking] industry is $4.23B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

CVLG’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileYGMZ’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • CVLG’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • YGMZ’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, CVLG is a better buy in the long-term than YGMZ.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

CVLG’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish while YGMZ’s TA Score has 3 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • CVLG’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 6 bearish.
  • YGMZ’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 6 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, both CVLG and YGMZ are a bad buy in the short-term.

Price Growth

CVLG (@Trucking) experienced а +3.12% price change this week, while YGMZ (@Trucking) price change was -0.97% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Trucking industry was +2.00%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +0.04%, and the average quarterly price growth was +59.80%.

Reported Earning Dates

CVLG is expected to report earnings on Oct 16, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Trucking (+2.00% weekly)

The trucking industry provides road transportation delivery and logistical services, including moving large quantities of raw materials, works in process, and finished goods —often from manufacturing plants to retail distribution centers. Trucks are also used in the construction industry, as they transport large amounts of rocks, concrete, and other building materials used in construction. Trucks in the U.S. are responsible for the majority of freight movement over land, and therefore play an important role in the manufacturing, transportation, and warehousing industries. The business could be affected by economic cycles, since it is closely linked with manufacturing, retail and construction. Some of the major trucking companies in the U.S. are Old Dominion Freight Line, Inc., J.B. Hunt Transport Services, Inc., and XPO Logistics, Inc.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CVLG($596M) has a higher market cap than YGMZ($61.3M). CVLG has higher P/E ratio than YGMZ: CVLG (18.19) vs YGMZ (12.34). CVLG YTD gains are higher at: -12.049 vs. YGMZ (-18.956). CVLG has more cash in the bank: 11.2M vs. YGMZ (3.68M). YGMZ has less debt than CVLG: YGMZ (20.4M) vs CVLG (278M).
CVLGYGMZCVLG / YGMZ
Capitalization596M61.3M972%
EBITDA150MN/A-
Gain YTD-12.049-18.95664%
P/E Ratio18.1912.34147%
Revenue1.12BN/A-
Total Cash11.2M3.68M305%
Total Debt278M20.4M1,363%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
CVLG: Fundamental Ratings
CVLG
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
77
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
52
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
35
SMR RATING
1..100
73
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
58
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
44
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
50

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
CVLGYGMZ
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 7 days ago
81%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
86%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
59%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
74%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
79%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
90%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
69%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
90%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
77%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
88%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
73%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
85%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
73%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
80%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
65%
Bearish Trend 7 days ago
90%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
90%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
74%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
90%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
CVLG
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
YGMZ
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
SEVIX14.97N/A
N/A
SEI US Managed Volatility I (SIMT)
CLWFX84.42-0.14
-0.17%
Columbia Large Cap Growth Inst2
IYBIX25.33-0.12
-0.47%
Macquarie Balanced Fund Class I
UTPSX76.12-0.36
-0.47%
ProFunds Utilities UltraSector Svc
PFSZX25.74-0.28
-1.08%
PGIM Jennison Financial Services Z

CVLG and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, CVLG has been closely correlated with KNX. These tickers have moved in lockstep 80% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if CVLG jumps, then KNX could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To CVLG
1D Price
Change %
CVLG100%
-1.77%
KNX - CVLG
80%
Closely correlated
-1.30%
MRTN - CVLG
79%
Closely correlated
-1.81%
ARCB - CVLG
78%
Closely correlated
-2.79%
SNDR - CVLG
78%
Closely correlated
-1.09%
WERN - CVLG
76%
Closely correlated
-1.06%
More

YGMZ and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that YGMZ and CVLG have been poorly correlated (+13% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that YGMZ and CVLG's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To YGMZ
1D Price
Change %
YGMZ100%
+2.55%
CVLG - YGMZ
13%
Poorly correlated
-1.77%
TFII - YGMZ
12%
Poorly correlated
+0.70%
ODFL - YGMZ
11%
Poorly correlated
+0.02%
KNX - YGMZ
8%
Poorly correlated
-1.30%
XPO - YGMZ
7%
Poorly correlated
-0.99%
More