Advertisement
CVLG vs TSPH
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CVLG is a Hold and TSPH is a Hold.
Long-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
CVLG’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileTSPH’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).
- CVLG’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
- TSPH’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
Short-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
CVLG’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish while TSPH’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).
- CVLG’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 4 bearish.
- TSPH’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 5 bearish.
Price Growth
CVLG (@Trucking) experienced а -0.98% price change this week, while TSPH (@Packaged Software) price change was +19.35% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Trucking industry was -6.11%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -14.42%, and the average quarterly price growth was +42.27%.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Packaged Software industry was -1.05%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -7.71%, and the average quarterly price growth was +35.04%.
Reported Earning Dates
CVLG is expected to report earnings on Jan 22, 2026.
Industries' Descriptions
@Trucking (-6.11% weekly)The trucking industry provides road transportation delivery and logistical services, including moving large quantities of raw materials, works in process, and finished goods —often from manufacturing plants to retail distribution centers. Trucks are also used in the construction industry, as they transport large amounts of rocks, concrete, and other building materials used in construction. Trucks in the U.S. are responsible for the majority of freight movement over land, and therefore play an important role in the manufacturing, transportation, and warehousing industries. The business could be affected by economic cycles, since it is closely linked with manufacturing, retail and construction. Some of the major trucking companies in the U.S. are Old Dominion Freight Line, Inc., J.B. Hunt Transport Services, Inc., and XPO Logistics, Inc.
@Packaged Software (-1.05% weekly)Packaged software comprises multiple software programs bundled together and sold as a group. For example, Microsoft Office includes multiple applications such as Excel, Word, and PowerPoint. In some cases, buying a bundled product is cheaper than purchasing each item individually[s20] . Microsoft Corporation, Oracle Corp. and Adobe are some major American packaged software makers.
| CVLG | TSPH | CVLG / TSPH | |
| Capitalization | 481M | 89.3M | 539% |
| EBITDA | 147M | N/A | - |
| Gain YTD | -27.228 | -12.500 | 218% |
| P/E Ratio | 17.96 | N/A | - |
| Revenue | 1.14B | N/A | - |
| Total Cash | 143K | N/A | - |
| Total Debt | 311M | N/A | - |
CVLG | ||
|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 12 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 43 Fair valued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 48 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 75 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 81 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 56 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 50 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
| CVLG | TSPH | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | N/A | 3 days ago 90% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 69% | 3 days ago 84% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 75% | 3 days ago 90% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 60% | 3 days ago 90% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 66% | 3 days ago 90% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 74% | 3 days ago 90% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 19 days ago 72% | 25 days ago 81% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 65% | N/A |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 71% | 3 days ago 88% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 81% | 3 days ago 90% |
Advertisement
CVLG and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, CVLG has been closely correlated with ARCB. These tickers have moved in lockstep 78% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if CVLG jumps, then ARCB could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To CVLG | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CVLG | 100% | +0.51% | ||
| ARCB - CVLG | 78% Closely correlated | -0.40% | ||
| KNX - CVLG | 78% Closely correlated | +1.06% | ||
| SNDR - CVLG | 77% Closely correlated | -0.27% | ||
| ODFL - CVLG | 74% Closely correlated | -0.47% | ||
| WERN - CVLG | 74% Closely correlated | +1.33% | ||
More | ||||
TSPH and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor tells us that TSPH and CVLG have been poorly correlated (+22% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that TSPH and CVLG's prices will move in lockstep.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To TSPH | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| TSPH | 100% | -6.67% | ||
| CVLG - TSPH | 22% Poorly correlated | +0.51% | ||
| RXO - TSPH | 5% Poorly correlated | +1.48% |