CVHSY
Price
$4.10
Change
-$0.69 (-14.41%)
Updated
Sep 5 closing price
Capitalization
741.15M
FRTN
Price
$0.05
Change
+$0.01 (+25.00%)
Updated
Sep 5 closing price
Capitalization
1.13M
Interact to see
Advertisement

CVHSY vs FRTN

Header iconCVHSY vs FRTN Comparison
Open Charts CVHSY vs FRTNBanner chart's image
CABLEVISION HLDGS SA
Price$4.10
Change-$0.69 (-14.41%)
Volume$514
Capitalization741.15M
Fortran
Price$0.05
Change+$0.01 (+25.00%)
Volume$2.1K
Capitalization1.13M
CVHSY vs FRTN Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
CVHSY
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
FRTN
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
CVHSY vs. FRTN commentary
Sep 09, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CVHSY is a Hold and FRTN is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Sep 09, 2025
Stock price -- (CVHSY: $4.10 vs. FRTN: $0.05)
Brand notoriety: CVHSY and FRTN are both not notable
Both companies represent the Major Telecommunications industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: CVHSY: 6% vs. FRTN: 16%
Market capitalization -- CVHSY: $741.15M vs. FRTN: $1.13M
CVHSY [@Major Telecommunications] is valued at $741.15M. FRTN’s [@Major Telecommunications] market capitalization is $1.13M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Major Telecommunications] industry ranges from $284.46B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Major Telecommunications] industry is $19.69B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

CVHSY’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileFRTN’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • CVHSY’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
  • FRTN’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, CVHSY is a better buy in the long-term than FRTN.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

CVHSY’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish while FRTN’s TA Score has 3 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • CVHSY’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 7 bearish.
  • FRTN’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 5 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, FRTN is a better buy in the short-term than CVHSY.

Price Growth

CVHSY (@Major Telecommunications) experienced а -14.41% price change this week, while FRTN (@Major Telecommunications) price change was +5.56% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Major Telecommunications industry was -0.25%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +4.56%, and the average quarterly price growth was +44.91%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Major Telecommunications (-0.25% weekly)

Major telecommunications include companies that make communication possible across the globe – by providing voice and data transmission via multiple channels such as phone or the Internet, through airwaves or cables, through wires or wirelessly. The ease with which we connect with anyone, anywhere in the world is thanks in large part to the infrastructure created by the telecom industry. Some major telecom players include AT&T Inc., Verizon Communications Inc. and Nippon Telegraph and Telephone Corporation.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CVHSY($741M) has a higher market cap than FRTN($1.13M). FRTN YTD gains are higher at: 94.672 vs. CVHSY (-25.463). FRTN has less debt than CVHSY: FRTN (525K) vs CVHSY (4.74T).
CVHSYFRTNCVHSY / FRTN
Capitalization741M1.13M65,402%
EBITDA1.25TN/A-
Gain YTD-25.46394.672-27%
P/E Ratio163.52N/A-
Revenue5.17TN/A-
Total Cash375BN/A-
Total Debt4.74T525K903,238,095%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
CVHSY vs FRTN: Fundamental Ratings
CVHSY
FRTN
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
5050
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
81
Overvalued
80
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
49100
SMR RATING
1..100
24100
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
6535
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
11
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/a75

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

FRTN's Valuation (80) in the null industry is in the same range as CVHSY (81). This means that FRTN’s stock grew similarly to CVHSY’s over the last 12 months.

CVHSY's Profit vs Risk Rating (49) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for FRTN (100). This means that CVHSY’s stock grew somewhat faster than FRTN’s over the last 12 months.

CVHSY's SMR Rating (24) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for FRTN (100). This means that CVHSY’s stock grew significantly faster than FRTN’s over the last 12 months.

FRTN's Price Growth Rating (35) in the null industry is in the same range as CVHSY (65). This means that FRTN’s stock grew similarly to CVHSY’s over the last 12 months.

FRTN's P/E Growth Rating (1) in the null industry is in the same range as CVHSY (1). This means that FRTN’s stock grew similarly to CVHSY’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
CVHSYFRTN
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
79%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
89%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
74%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
85%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
76%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
83%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
80%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
90%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
68%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
78%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
71%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
77%
Advances
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 13 days ago
78%
Bearish Trend 12 days ago
84%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
85%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
90%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
60%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
90%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
CVHSY
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
FRTN
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
EIHSX13.440.01
+0.07%
Eaton Vance Worldwide Health Sci I
MGQIX18.160.01
+0.06%
Morgan Stanley Inst Global Stars I
TWQIX16.54-0.03
-0.18%
Transamerica Large Cap Value I
OEICX96.12-0.30
-0.31%
JPMorgan Equity Index C
KCVIX18.43-0.11
-0.59%
Knights of Columbus Large Cap Value I

CVHSY and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that CVHSY and HKTTY have been poorly correlated (+23% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that CVHSY and HKTTY's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To CVHSY
1D Price
Change %
CVHSY100%
-14.41%
HKTTY - CVHSY
23%
Poorly correlated
-0.83%
IIJIF - CVHSY
22%
Poorly correlated
N/A
BZQIY - CVHSY
9%
Poorly correlated
-3.71%
FRTN - CVHSY
3%
Poorly correlated
+15.85%
BTGOF - CVHSY
1%
Poorly correlated
+0.55%
More

FRTN and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that FRTN and FULO have been poorly correlated (+6% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that FRTN and FULO's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To FRTN
1D Price
Change %
FRTN100%
+15.85%
FULO - FRTN
6%
Poorly correlated
+1.20%
GMOYF - FRTN
5%
Poorly correlated
N/A
CVHSY - FRTN
3%
Poorly correlated
-14.41%
GTMEF - FRTN
0%
Poorly correlated
N/A
FNGR - FRTN
-1%
Poorly correlated
+2.74%
More