CVHSY
Price
$4.50
Change
-$0.55 (-10.89%)
Updated
Jan 14 closing price
Capitalization
915.74M
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
FRTN
Price
$0.13
Change
-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Updated
Jan 15 closing price
Capitalization
2.99M
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

CVHSY vs FRTN

Header iconCVHSY vs FRTN Comparison
Open Charts CVHSY vs FRTNBanner chart's image
CABLEVISION HLDGS SA
Price$4.50
Change-$0.55 (-10.89%)
Volume$8.7K
Capitalization915.74M
Fortran
Price$0.13
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Volume$4.61K
Capitalization2.99M
CVHSY vs FRTN Comparison Chart in %
CVHSY
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
FRTN
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
CVHSY vs. FRTN commentary
Jan 17, 2026

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CVHSY is a Hold and FRTN is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jan 17, 2026
Stock price -- (CVHSY: $4.50 vs. FRTN: $0.13)
Brand notoriety: CVHSY and FRTN are both not notable
Both companies represent the Major Telecommunications industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: CVHSY: 741% vs. FRTN: 15%
Market capitalization -- CVHSY: $915.74M vs. FRTN: $2.99M
CVHSY [@Major Telecommunications] is valued at $915.74M. FRTN’s [@Major Telecommunications] market capitalization is $2.99M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Major Telecommunications] industry ranges from $208.4B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Major Telecommunications] industry is $18.66B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

CVHSY’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileFRTN’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • CVHSY’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
  • FRTN’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, CVHSY is a better buy in the long-term than FRTN.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

CVHSY’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while FRTN’s TA Score has 2 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • CVHSY’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 5 bearish.
  • FRTN’s TA Score: 2 bullish, 5 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, CVHSY is a better buy in the short-term than FRTN.

Price Growth

CVHSY (@Major Telecommunications) experienced а -10.89% price change this week, while FRTN (@Major Telecommunications) price change was +12.84% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Major Telecommunications industry was -0.46%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +1.31%, and the average quarterly price growth was +12.84%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Major Telecommunications (-0.46% weekly)

Major telecommunications include companies that make communication possible across the globe – by providing voice and data transmission via multiple channels such as phone or the Internet, through airwaves or cables, through wires or wirelessly. The ease with which we connect with anyone, anywhere in the world is thanks in large part to the infrastructure created by the telecom industry. Some major telecom players include AT&T Inc., Verizon Communications Inc. and Nippon Telegraph and Telephone Corporation.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CVHSY($916M) has a higher market cap than FRTN($2.99M). FRTN YTD gains are higher at: 10.841 vs. CVHSY (-15.094). CVHSY has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 1.03T vs. FRTN (-38.41K). FRTN has less debt than CVHSY: FRTN (525K) vs CVHSY (5.49T). CVHSY has higher revenues than FRTN: CVHSY (6T) vs FRTN (17.5M).
CVHSYFRTNCVHSY / FRTN
Capitalization916M2.99M30,656%
EBITDA1.03T-38.41K-2,673,991,720%
Gain YTD-15.09410.841-139%
P/E Ratio163.52N/A-
Revenue6T17.5M34,297,143%
Total Cash678BN/A-
Total Debt5.49T525K1,045,142,857%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
CVHSY vs FRTN: Fundamental Ratings
CVHSY
FRTN
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
8686
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
89
Overvalued
88
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
57100
SMR RATING
1..100
33100
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
5734
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
11
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
5050

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

FRTN's Valuation (88) in the null industry is in the same range as CVHSY (89). This means that FRTN’s stock grew similarly to CVHSY’s over the last 12 months.

CVHSY's Profit vs Risk Rating (57) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for FRTN (100). This means that CVHSY’s stock grew somewhat faster than FRTN’s over the last 12 months.

CVHSY's SMR Rating (33) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for FRTN (100). This means that CVHSY’s stock grew significantly faster than FRTN’s over the last 12 months.

FRTN's Price Growth Rating (34) in the null industry is in the same range as CVHSY (57). This means that FRTN’s stock grew similarly to CVHSY’s over the last 12 months.

FRTN's P/E Growth Rating (1) in the null industry is in the same range as CVHSY (1). This means that FRTN’s stock grew similarly to CVHSY’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
CVHSYFRTN
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
80%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
90%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
71%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
75%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
78%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
85%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
82%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
77%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
70%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
78%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
71%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
77%
Advances
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Declines
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 10 days ago
79%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
82%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
87%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
75%
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
88%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
CVHSY
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
FRTN
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
PJVQX24.480.10
+0.41%
PGIM Jennison Value R6
SSIQX14.700.01
+0.07%
State Street International Stock Sel K
MIDRX31.820.02
+0.06%
MFS International New Discovery R2
SHDIX10.06-0.03
-0.30%
American Beacon Shapiro SMID Cap Eq R5
EMREX22.37-0.09
-0.40%
JPMorgan Emerging Mkts Rsrch Enh Eq I

CVHSY and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that CVHSY and IIJIF have been poorly correlated (+33% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that CVHSY and IIJIF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To CVHSY
1D Price
Change %
CVHSY100%
N/A
IIJIF - CVHSY
33%
Poorly correlated
N/A
TEO - CVHSY
21%
Poorly correlated
-0.91%
BGAOY - CVHSY
21%
Poorly correlated
N/A
TV - CVHSY
20%
Poorly correlated
+0.67%
CGEAF - CVHSY
12%
Poorly correlated
+8.64%
More

FRTN and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that FRTN and FNGR have been poorly correlated (+8% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that FRTN and FNGR's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To FRTN
1D Price
Change %
FRTN100%
N/A
FNGR - FRTN
8%
Poorly correlated
-7.38%
FULO - FRTN
6%
Poorly correlated
N/A
GMOYF - FRTN
5%
Poorly correlated
N/A
CVHSY - FRTN
3%
Poorly correlated
N/A
ELMUY - FRTN
2%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More