CUZ
Price
$30.09
Change
-$0.26 (-0.86%)
Updated
Feb 21 closing price
Capitalization
3.52B
60 days until earnings call
SLG
Price
$62.73
Change
-$1.71 (-2.65%)
Updated
Feb 21 closing price
Capitalization
3.57B
52 days until earnings call
Ad is loading...

CUZ vs SLG

Header iconCUZ vs SLG Comparison
Open Charts CUZ vs SLGBanner chart's image
Cousins Properties
Price$30.09
Change-$0.26 (-0.86%)
Volume$960.89K
Capitalization3.52B
SL Green Realty
Price$62.73
Change-$1.71 (-2.65%)
Volume$705.05K
Capitalization3.57B
CUZ vs SLG Comparison Chart
Loading...
CUZ
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
SLG
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
CUZ vs. SLG commentary
Feb 23, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CUZ is a Hold and SLG is a Hold.

Ad is loading...
COMPARISON
Comparison
Feb 23, 2025
Stock price -- (CUZ: $30.35 vs. SLG: $65.85)
Brand notoriety: CUZ and SLG are both not notable
Both companies represent the Real Estate Investment Trusts industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: CUZ: 124% vs. SLG: 65%
Market capitalization -- CUZ: $3.52B vs. SLG: $3.57B
CUZ [@Real Estate Investment Trusts] is valued at $3.52B. SLG’s [@Real Estate Investment Trusts] market capitalization is $3.57B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Real Estate Investment Trusts] industry ranges from $243.79B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Real Estate Investment Trusts] industry is $5.39B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

CUZ’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileSLG’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • CUZ’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • SLG’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, CUZ is a better buy in the long-term than SLG.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

CUZ’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish while SLG’s TA Score has 2 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • CUZ’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 3 bearish.
  • SLG’s TA Score: 2 bullish, 3 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, CUZ is a better buy in the short-term than SLG.

Price Growth

CUZ (@Real Estate Investment Trusts) experienced а -1.24% price change this week, while SLG (@Real Estate Investment Trusts) price change was +2.17% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Real Estate Investment Trusts industry was -0.93%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +0.34%, and the average quarterly price growth was -4.61%.

Reported Earning Dates

CUZ is expected to report earnings on Apr 24, 2025.

SLG is expected to report earnings on Apr 16, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Real Estate Investment Trusts (-0.93% weekly)

A real estate investment trust (REIT) is a company any that owns, and in most cases, operates, income-producing real estate – ranging from office and apartment buildings to warehouses, hospitals, shopping centers, hotels and timberlands. Some REITs are involved in financing real estate. Equity REITs invest in and own properties, while mortgage REITs own and invest in property mortgages. REITs are required by law to pay out at least 90% of their annual taxable income (excluding capital gains) to shareholders in the form of dividends. Some REITs could be more cyclical than others; for example, when an economy is undergoing a recession, hotel REITs could be more vulnerable, compared to say healthcare REIT given that healthcare needs are less likely to depend on economic cycles. American Tower Corporation, Prologis, Inc. and Crown Castle International Corp are some of the biggest REIT companies in the U.S.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
SLG($3.57B) and CUZ($3.52B) have the same market capitalization . CUZ has higher P/E ratio than SLG: CUZ (42.09) vs SLG (8.70). CUZ YTD gains are higher at: 0.089 vs. SLG (-2.671). CUZ has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 504M vs. SLG (-206.38M). SLG has more cash in the bank: 231M vs. CUZ (6.05M). CUZ has less debt than SLG: CUZ (2.51B) vs SLG (4.42B). SLG has higher revenues than CUZ: SLG (914M) vs CUZ (803M).
CUZSLGCUZ / SLG
Capitalization3.52B3.57B99%
EBITDA504M-206.38M-244%
Gain YTD0.089-2.671-3%
P/E Ratio42.098.70484%
Revenue803M914M88%
Total Cash6.05M231M3%
Total Debt2.51B4.42B57%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
CUZ vs SLG: Fundamental Ratings
CUZ
SLG
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
1868
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
73
Overvalued
97
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
100100
SMR RATING
1..100
8991
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
4952
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
656
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/an/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

CUZ's Valuation (73) in the Real Estate Investment Trusts industry is in the same range as SLG (97). This means that CUZ’s stock grew similarly to SLG’s over the last 12 months.

CUZ's Profit vs Risk Rating (100) in the Real Estate Investment Trusts industry is in the same range as SLG (100). This means that CUZ’s stock grew similarly to SLG’s over the last 12 months.

CUZ's SMR Rating (89) in the Real Estate Investment Trusts industry is in the same range as SLG (91). This means that CUZ’s stock grew similarly to SLG’s over the last 12 months.

CUZ's Price Growth Rating (49) in the Real Estate Investment Trusts industry is in the same range as SLG (52). This means that CUZ’s stock grew similarly to SLG’s over the last 12 months.

CUZ's P/E Growth Rating (6) in the Real Estate Investment Trusts industry is somewhat better than the same rating for SLG (56). This means that CUZ’s stock grew somewhat faster than SLG’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
CUZSLG
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 6 days ago
64%
Bearish Trend 6 days ago
70%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 6 days ago
63%
Bullish Trend 6 days ago
84%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 6 days ago
65%
N/A
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 6 days ago
63%
Bullish Trend 6 days ago
78%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 6 days ago
59%
Bullish Trend 6 days ago
80%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 17 days ago
61%
Bullish Trend 6 days ago
76%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 26 days ago
67%
Bearish Trend 13 days ago
76%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 6 days ago
60%
Bearish Trend 6 days ago
83%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Ad is loading...
CUZ
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
SLG
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
SPY611.491.79
+0.29%
SPDR® S&P 500® ETF Trust
AAPL244.47-0.13
-0.05%
Apple
GME26.97-0.03
-0.11%
GameStop Corp
BTC.X95539.550000-233.835940
-0.24%
Bitcoin cryptocurrency
TSLA354.11-1.73
-0.49%
Tesla

CUZ and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, CUZ has been closely correlated with HIW. These tickers have moved in lockstep 87% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if CUZ jumps, then HIW could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To CUZ
1D Price
Change %
CUZ100%
+1.34%
HIW - CUZ
87%
Closely correlated
+0.56%
BDN - CUZ
86%
Closely correlated
+0.41%
BXP - CUZ
80%
Closely correlated
+0.41%
DEI - CUZ
80%
Closely correlated
-1.06%
KRC - CUZ
77%
Closely correlated
-0.54%
More

SLG and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, SLG has been closely correlated with VNO. These tickers have moved in lockstep 82% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if SLG jumps, then VNO could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To SLG
1D Price
Change %
SLG100%
+2.05%
VNO - SLG
82%
Closely correlated
-1.20%
HIW - SLG
80%
Closely correlated
+0.56%
DEI - SLG
79%
Closely correlated
-1.06%
BXP - SLG
78%
Closely correlated
+0.41%
CUZ - SLG
76%
Closely correlated
+1.34%
More