Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CUT vs MOO
CUT vs MOO Comparison
Open Charts CUT vs MOO
Invesco MSCI Global Timber ETF
Price$28.44
Change+$0.17 (+0.60%)
Volume$1.67K
Net Assets41.13M
VanEck Agribusiness ETF
Price$73.01
Change+$0.53 (+0.73%)
Volume$34.31K
Net Assets599.08M
CUT vs MOO Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
Show more...
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CUT vs. MOO commentary
Oct 20, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CUT is a Hold and MOO is a Hold.
SUMMARIES
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
MOO has more net assets: 599M vs. CUT (41.1M). MOO has a higher annual dividend yield than CUT: MOO (13.159) vs CUT (-10.196). CUT was incepted earlier than MOO: CUT (18 years) vs MOO (18 years). MOO (0.55) has a lower expense ratio than CUT (0.74). CUT has a higher turnover MOO (12.00) vs MOO (12.00).
| CUT | MOO | CUT / MOO | |
| Gain YTD | -10.196 | 13.159 | -77% |
| Net Assets | 41.1M | 599M | 7% |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.74 | 0.55 | 135% |
| Turnover | 32.00 | 12.00 | 267% |
| Yield | 3.26 | 2.99 | 109% |
| Fund Existence | 18 years | 18 years | - |
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
| CUT | MOO | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 90% | 3 days ago 88% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 79% | 3 days ago 77% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 80% | 3 days ago 81% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 82% | 3 days ago 74% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 79% | 3 days ago 82% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 79% | 3 days ago 81% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 6 days ago 81% | 5 days ago 79% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 81% | 10 days ago 80% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 90% | 3 days ago 89% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 76% | 3 days ago 77% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Show more...
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
CUT and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor tells us that CUT and PACK have been poorly correlated (+10% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that CUT and PACK's prices will move in lockstep.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To CUT | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CUT | 100% | +0.58% | ||
| PACK - CUT | 10% Poorly correlated | -7.25% | ||
| SEM - CUT | 6% Poorly correlated | +0.22% | ||
| IP - CUT | 5% Poorly correlated | -0.13% | ||
| CLW - CUT | 4% Poorly correlated | -1.35% | ||
| SLVM - CUT | 3% Poorly correlated | +0.07% | ||
More | ||||
MOO and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, MOO has been closely correlated with DE. These tickers have moved in lockstep 69% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if MOO jumps, then DE could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To MOO | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| MOO | 100% | +0.73% | ||
| DE - MOO | 69% Closely correlated | +0.29% | ||
| CNH - MOO | 69% Closely correlated | -0.10% | ||
| CTVA - MOO | 65% Loosely correlated | +0.66% | ||
| MOS - MOO | 65% Loosely correlated | -0.37% | ||
| AGCO - MOO | 60% Loosely correlated | -1.16% | ||
More | ||||