Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CUT vs MOO
CUT vs MOO Comparison
Open Charts CUT vs MOO
Invesco MSCI Global Timber ETF
Price$30.06
Change-$0.63 (-2.05%)
Volume$2.73K
Net Assets47.58M
VanEck Agribusiness ETF
Price$74.19
Change+$0.28 (+0.38%)
Volume$78.32K
Net Assets617.69M
CUT vs MOO Comparison Chart
Loading...
Show more...
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CUT vs. MOO commentary
Jun 14, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CUT is a Hold and MOO is a Buy.
SUMMARIES
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
MOO has more net assets: 618M vs. CUT (47.6M). MOO has a higher annual dividend yield than CUT: MOO (14.988) vs CUT (-5.081). CUT was incepted earlier than MOO: CUT (18 years) vs MOO (18 years). MOO (0.55) has a lower expense ratio than CUT (0.74). CUT has a higher turnover MOO (12.00) vs MOO (12.00).
| CUT | MOO | CUT / MOO | |
| Gain YTD | -5.081 | 14.988 | -34% |
| Net Assets | 47.6M | 618M | 8% |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.74 | 0.55 | 135% |
| Turnover | 32.00 | 12.00 | 267% |
| Yield | 3.17 | 3.04 | 104% |
| Fund Existence | 18 years | 18 years | - |
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
| MOO | |
|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 76% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 88% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | N/A |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 87% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 83% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 81% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 81% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | N/A |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 75% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 82% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Show more...
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
CUT and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, CUT has been loosely correlated with AMCR. These tickers have moved in lockstep 65% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if CUT jumps, then AMCR could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To CUT | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CUT | 100% | -2.05% | ||
| AMCR - CUT | 65% Loosely correlated | -1.52% | ||
| WFG - CUT | 54% Loosely correlated | -1.02% | ||
| SLVM - CUT | 53% Loosely correlated | -3.78% | ||
| MAGN - CUT | 48% Loosely correlated | -7.49% | ||
| PACK - CUT | 43% Loosely correlated | -5.18% | ||
More | ||||
MOO and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, MOO has been closely correlated with CTVA. These tickers have moved in lockstep 74% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if MOO jumps, then CTVA could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To MOO | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| MOO | 100% | +0.37% | ||
| CTVA - MOO | 74% Closely correlated | -0.12% | ||
| CNH - MOO | 71% Closely correlated | -1.64% | ||
| NTR - MOO | 66% Loosely correlated | +4.05% | ||
| DE - MOO | 64% Loosely correlated | -1.41% | ||
| AGCO - MOO | 64% Loosely correlated | -0.33% | ||
More | ||||