Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CUT vs MOO
CUT vs MOO Comparison
Open Charts CUT vs MOO
Invesco MSCI Global Timber ETF
Price$30.91
Change+$1.07 (+3.59%)
Volume$217
Net Assets37.19M
VanEck Agribusiness ETF
Price$82.32
Change+$0.79 (+0.97%)
Volume$100
Net Assets850.47M
CUT vs MOO Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CUT vs. MOO commentary
Feb 04, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CUT is a Hold and MOO is a Buy.
SUMMARIES
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
MOO has more net assets: 850M vs. CUT (37.2M). MOO has a higher annual dividend yield than CUT: MOO (12.007) vs CUT (2.691). CUT was incepted earlier than MOO: CUT (18 years) vs MOO (18 years). MOO (0.55) has a lower expense ratio than CUT (0.74). CUT has a higher turnover MOO (12.00) vs MOO (12.00).
| CUT | MOO | CUT / MOO | |
| Gain YTD | 2.691 | 12.007 | 22% |
| Net Assets | 37.2M | 850M | 4% |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.74 | 0.55 | 135% |
| Turnover | 26.00 | 12.00 | 217% |
| Yield | 2.40 | 2.23 | 107% |
| Fund Existence | 18 years | 18 years | - |
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
| CUT | MOO | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 90% | 2 days ago 83% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 85% | N/A |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 73% | N/A |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 79% | N/A |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 82% | 2 days ago 80% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 74% | 2 days ago 76% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 81% | 2 days ago 78% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 6 days ago 82% | 16 days ago 81% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 88% | 2 days ago 83% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 73% | 2 days ago 78% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers
CUT and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, CUT has been loosely correlated with SLVM. These tickers have moved in lockstep 54% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if CUT jumps, then SLVM could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To CUT | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CUT | 100% | +0.10% | ||
| SLVM - CUT | 54% Loosely correlated | -1.34% | ||
| PACK - CUT | 42% Loosely correlated | +0.80% | ||
| SEM - CUT | 8% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
| IP - CUT | 6% Poorly correlated | +3.37% | ||
| CLW - CUT | 4% Poorly correlated | -3.97% | ||
More | ||||
MOO and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, MOO has been closely correlated with CNH. These tickers have moved in lockstep 69% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if MOO jumps, then CNH could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To MOO | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| MOO | 100% | +1.02% | ||
| CNH - MOO | 69% Closely correlated | +2.37% | ||
| DE - MOO | 69% Closely correlated | +2.40% | ||
| CTVA - MOO | 65% Loosely correlated | +2.51% | ||
| MOS - MOO | 64% Loosely correlated | +3.81% | ||
| AGCO - MOO | 60% Loosely correlated | +1.63% | ||
More | ||||