Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CUT vs MOO
CUT vs MOO Comparison
Open Charts CUT vs MOO
Invesco MSCI Global Timber ETF
Price$31.54
Change+$0.35 (+1.12%)
Volume$4.7K
Net Assets48.34M
VanEck Agribusiness ETF
Price$74.85
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Volume$193
Net Assets647.5M
CUT vs MOO Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
Show more...
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CUT vs. MOO commentary
Jul 27, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CUT is a Buy and MOO is a Hold.
SUMMARIES
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
MOO has more net assets: 648M vs. CUT (48.3M). MOO has a higher annual dividend yield than CUT: MOO (15.902) vs CUT (-0.416). CUT was incepted earlier than MOO: CUT (18 years) vs MOO (18 years). MOO (0.55) has a lower expense ratio than CUT (0.74). CUT has a higher turnover MOO (12.00) vs MOO (12.00).
| CUT | MOO | CUT / MOO | |
| Gain YTD | -0.416 | 15.902 | -3% |
| Net Assets | 48.3M | 648M | 7% |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.74 | 0.55 | 135% |
| Turnover | 32.00 | 12.00 | 267% |
| Yield | 3.21 | 2.99 | 107% |
| Fund Existence | 18 years | 18 years | - |
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
| CUT | MOO | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | N/A | 2 days ago 90% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 81% | 2 days ago 80% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 78% | 2 days ago 88% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 83% | 2 days ago 87% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 82% | 2 days ago 83% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 78% | 2 days ago 81% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 83% | 4 days ago 81% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 12 days ago 81% | 2 days ago 81% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 79% | N/A |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 73% | 2 days ago 79% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Show more...
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
CUT and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, CUT has been loosely correlated with AMCR. These tickers have moved in lockstep 65% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if CUT jumps, then AMCR could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To CUT | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CUT | 100% | +1.12% | ||
| AMCR - CUT | 65% Loosely correlated | -0.20% | ||
| WFG - CUT | 55% Loosely correlated | +1.72% | ||
| SLVM - CUT | 55% Loosely correlated | +1.16% | ||
| MAGN - CUT | 52% Loosely correlated | -0.07% | ||
| PACK - CUT | 43% Loosely correlated | -0.77% | ||
More | ||||
MOO and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, MOO has been closely correlated with CTVA. These tickers have moved in lockstep 73% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if MOO jumps, then CTVA could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To MOO | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| MOO | 100% | -0.09% | ||
| CTVA - MOO | 73% Closely correlated | +0.42% | ||
| CNH - MOO | 72% Closely correlated | +0.76% | ||
| DE - MOO | 64% Loosely correlated | +0.53% | ||
| AGCO - MOO | 64% Loosely correlated | +1.69% | ||
| MOS - MOO | 64% Loosely correlated | -0.75% | ||
More | ||||