Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CUT vs MOO
CUT vs MOO Comparison
Open Charts CUT vs MOO
Invesco MSCI Global Timber ETF
Price$29.27
Change+$0.12 (+0.41%)
Volume$2.55K
Net Assets42.28M
VanEck Agribusiness ETF
Price$73.64
Change+$0.61 (+0.84%)
Volume$25.62K
Net Assets603.15M
CUT vs MOO Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
Show more...
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CUT vs. MOO commentary
Sep 28, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CUT is a Hold and MOO is a Hold.
SUMMARIES
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
MOO has more net assets: 603M vs. CUT (42.3M). MOO has a higher annual dividend yield than CUT: MOO (14.135) vs CUT (-7.559). CUT was incepted earlier than MOO: CUT (18 years) vs MOO (18 years). MOO (0.55) has a lower expense ratio than CUT (0.74). CUT has a higher turnover MOO (12.00) vs MOO (12.00).
| CUT | MOO | CUT / MOO | |
| Gain YTD | -7.559 | 14.135 | -53% |
| Net Assets | 42.3M | 603M | 7% |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.74 | 0.55 | 135% |
| Turnover | 32.00 | 12.00 | 267% |
| Yield | 3.11 | 2.94 | 106% |
| Fund Existence | 18 years | 18 years | - |
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
| CUT | MOO | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 90% | 4 days ago 76% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 80% | 3 days ago 86% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 80% | 3 days ago 75% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 83% | 3 days ago 87% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 80% | 3 days ago 82% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 78% | 3 days ago 81% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 6 days ago 82% | 21 days ago 80% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 81% | 6 days ago 81% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 90% | 5 days ago 90% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 76% | 3 days ago 77% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Show more...
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
CUT and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor tells us that CUT and PACK have been poorly correlated (+8% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that CUT and PACK's prices will move in lockstep.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To CUT | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CUT | 100% | +0.43% | ||
| PACK - CUT | 8% Poorly correlated | +3.32% | ||
| SEM - CUT | 7% Poorly correlated | +1.85% | ||
| IP - CUT | 5% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
| CLW - CUT | 3% Poorly correlated | +1.35% | ||
| MERC - CUT | 2% Poorly correlated | +1.49% | ||
More | ||||
MOO and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, MOO has been closely correlated with DE. These tickers have moved in lockstep 70% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if MOO jumps, then DE could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To MOO | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| MOO | 100% | +0.84% | ||
| DE - MOO | 70% Closely correlated | -0.58% | ||
| CTVA - MOO | 69% Closely correlated | +1.51% | ||
| CNH - MOO | 69% Closely correlated | +0.74% | ||
| MOS - MOO | 65% Loosely correlated | +1.52% | ||
| AGCO - MOO | 61% Loosely correlated | +1.66% | ||
More | ||||