Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CUT vs MOO
CUT vs MOO Comparison
Open Charts CUT vs MOO
Invesco MSCI Global Timber ETF
Price$30.59
Change-$0.06 (-0.20%)
Volume$334
Net Assets46.29M
VanEck Agribusiness ETF
Price$73.77
Change+$0.41 (+0.56%)
Volume$52.62K
Net Assets628.26M
CUT vs MOO Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
Show more...
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CUT vs. MOO commentary
Aug 18, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CUT is a StrongBuy and MOO is a Hold.
SUMMARIES
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
MOO has more net assets: 628M vs. CUT (46.3M). MOO has a higher annual dividend yield than CUT: MOO (14.337) vs CUT (-3.243). CUT was incepted earlier than MOO: CUT (18 years) vs MOO (18 years). MOO (0.55) has a lower expense ratio than CUT (0.74). CUT has a higher turnover MOO (12.00) vs MOO (12.00).
| CUT | MOO | CUT / MOO | |
| Gain YTD | -3.243 | 14.337 | -23% |
| Net Assets | 46.3M | 628M | 7% |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.74 | 0.55 | 135% |
| Turnover | 32.00 | 12.00 | 267% |
| Yield | 3.28 | 3.03 | 108% |
| Fund Existence | 18 years | 18 years | - |
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
| CUT | MOO | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | N/A | N/A |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 88% | 3 days ago 83% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 81% | 3 days ago 88% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 89% | 3 days ago 85% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 81% | 3 days ago 83% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 78% | 3 days ago 80% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 5 days ago 82% | 5 days ago 80% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 81% | 17 days ago 81% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 83% | N/A |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 80% | 3 days ago 75% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Show more...
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
CUT and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor tells us that CUT and AMCR have been poorly correlated (+17% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that CUT and AMCR's prices will move in lockstep.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To CUT | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CUT | 100% | -0.04% | ||
| AMCR - CUT | 17% Poorly correlated | -0.34% | ||
| GPK - CUT | 12% Poorly correlated | -0.49% | ||
| MERC - CUT | 10% Poorly correlated | -1.64% | ||
| SON - CUT | 9% Poorly correlated | +0.52% | ||
| AVY - CUT | 8% Poorly correlated | -2.59% | ||
More | ||||
MOO and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, MOO has been closely correlated with CTVA. These tickers have moved in lockstep 72% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if MOO jumps, then CTVA could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To MOO | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| MOO | 100% | +0.56% | ||
| CTVA - MOO | 72% Closely correlated | -0.15% | ||
| DE - MOO | 70% Closely correlated | +2.08% | ||
| CNH - MOO | 70% Closely correlated | +0.33% | ||
| MOS - MOO | 67% Closely correlated | +1.15% | ||
| AGCO - MOO | 62% Loosely correlated | +1.04% | ||
More | ||||