Ad is loading...
CUT vs MOO
CUT vs MOO Comparison
Open Charts CUT vs MOO
Invesco MSCI Global Timber ETF
Price$32.58
Change-$0.30 (-0.91%)
Volume$3.63K
Net Assets51.03M
VanEck Agribusiness ETF
Price$68.12
Change-$0.21 (-0.31%)
Volume$32.13K
Net Assets573.19M
CUT vs MOO Comparison Chart
Loading...
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CUT vs. MOO commentary
Feb 24, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CUT is a Hold and MOO is a Buy.
SUMMARIES
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
MOO has more net assets: 573M vs. CUT (51M). MOO has a higher annual dividend yield than CUT: MOO (5.580) vs CUT (2.870). CUT was incepted earlier than MOO: CUT (17 years) vs MOO (17 years). MOO has a higher turnover CUT (10.00) vs CUT (10.00).
| CUT | MOO | CUT / MOO | |
| Gain YTD | 2.870 | 5.580 | 51% |
| Net Assets | 51M | 573M | 9% |
| Total Expense Ratio | N/A | N/A | - |
| Turnover | 10.00 | 12.00 | 83% |
| Yield | 2.31 | 2.97 | 78% |
| Fund Existence | 17 years | 17 years | - |
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
| MOO | |
|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 86% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 83% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 90% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 79% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 84% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 82% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 6 days ago 81% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 17 days ago 81% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | N/A |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 79% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
CUT and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, CUT has been loosely correlated with WFG. These tickers have moved in lockstep 51% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if CUT jumps, then WFG could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To CUT | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CUT | 100% | -0.94% | ||
| WFG - CUT | 51% Loosely correlated | -1.73% | ||
| AMCR - CUT | 49% Loosely correlated | -1.35% | ||
| SLVM - CUT | 46% Loosely correlated | -1.85% | ||
| PTVE - CUT | 32% Poorly correlated | +0.06% | ||
| ALTR - CUT | 19% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
More | ||||
MOO and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, MOO has been closely correlated with CTVA. These tickers have moved in lockstep 70% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if MOO jumps, then CTVA could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To MOO | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| MOO | 100% | -0.31% | ||
| CTVA - MOO | 70% Closely correlated | -1.68% | ||
| NTR - MOO | 70% Closely correlated | -1.05% | ||
| CNH - MOO | 68% Closely correlated | -2.48% | ||
| DE - MOO | 64% Loosely correlated | -1.17% | ||
| AGCO - MOO | 64% Loosely correlated | -2.77% | ||
More | ||||