Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CUT vs LITP
CUT vs LITP Comparison
Open Charts CUT vs LITP
Invesco MSCI Global Timber ETF
Price$31.54
Change+$0.35 (+1.12%)
Volume$4.7K
Net Assets48.34M
Sprott Lithium Miners ETF
Price$7.83
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Volume$28.28K
Net Assets20.25M
CUT vs LITP Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
Show more...
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CUT vs. LITP commentary
Jul 27, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CUT is a Buy and LITP is a Buy.
SUMMARIES
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CUT has more net assets: 48.3M vs. LITP (20.2M). LITP has a higher annual dividend yield than CUT: LITP (17.290) vs CUT (-0.416). CUT was incepted earlier than LITP: CUT (18 years) vs LITP (2 years). LITP (0.65) has a lower expense ratio than CUT (0.74). LITP has a higher turnover CUT (32.00) vs CUT (32.00).
| CUT | LITP | CUT / LITP | |
| Gain YTD | -0.416 | 17.290 | -2% |
| Net Assets | 48.3M | 20.2M | 239% |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.74 | 0.65 | 114% |
| Turnover | 32.00 | 49.00 | 65% |
| Yield | 3.21 | 7.64 | 42% |
| Fund Existence | 18 years | 2 years | - |
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
| CUT | LITP | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | N/A | 3 days ago 90% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 81% | 3 days ago 90% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 78% | 3 days ago 89% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 83% | 3 days ago 85% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 82% | 3 days ago 85% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 78% | 3 days ago 81% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 5 days ago 83% | 6 days ago 83% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 13 days ago 81% | 12 days ago 90% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 79% | 3 days ago 90% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 73% | 3 days ago 78% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Show more...
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
CUT and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, CUT has been loosely correlated with AMCR. These tickers have moved in lockstep 65% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if CUT jumps, then AMCR could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To CUT | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CUT | 100% | +1.12% | ||
| AMCR - CUT | 65% Loosely correlated | -0.20% | ||
| WFG - CUT | 56% Loosely correlated | +1.72% | ||
| SLVM - CUT | 55% Loosely correlated | +1.16% | ||
| MAGN - CUT | 52% Loosely correlated | -0.07% | ||
| PACK - CUT | 43% Loosely correlated | -0.77% | ||
More | ||||
LITP and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, LITP has been closely correlated with ALB. These tickers have moved in lockstep 77% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if LITP jumps, then ALB could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To LITP | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| LITP | 100% | -0.06% | ||
| ALB - LITP | 77% Closely correlated | -0.52% | ||
| SQM - LITP | 77% Closely correlated | +0.58% | ||
| PLL - LITP | 72% Closely correlated | -5.24% | ||
| LAR - LITP | 71% Closely correlated | +5.90% | ||
| LAC - LITP | 64% Loosely correlated | -4.69% | ||
More | ||||