Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CUT vs LITP
CUT vs LITP Comparison
Open Charts CUT vs LITP
Invesco MSCI Global Timber ETF
Price$31.28
Change-$0.10 (-0.32%)
Volume$806
Net Assets48.59M
Sprott Lithium Miners ETF
Price$6.37
Change+$0.26 (+4.26%)
Volume$10.91K
Net Assets14.68M
CUT vs LITP Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
Show more...
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CUT vs. LITP commentary
Jul 07, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CUT is a Buy and LITP is a Hold.
SUMMARIES
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CUT has more net assets: 48.6M vs. LITP (14.7M). CUT has a higher annual dividend yield than LITP: CUT (-1.206) vs LITP (-4.641). CUT was incepted earlier than LITP: CUT (18 years) vs LITP (2 years). LITP (0.65) has a lower expense ratio than CUT (0.74). LITP has a higher turnover CUT (32.00) vs CUT (32.00).
| CUT | LITP | CUT / LITP | |
| Gain YTD | -1.206 | -4.641 | 26% |
| Net Assets | 48.6M | 14.7M | 331% |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.74 | 0.65 | 114% |
| Turnover | 32.00 | 49.00 | 65% |
| Yield | 3.21 | 7.64 | 42% |
| Fund Existence | 18 years | 2 years | - |
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
| CUT | LITP | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | N/A | 5 days ago 88% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 5 days ago 83% | 5 days ago 90% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 5 days ago 81% | 5 days ago 75% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 5 days ago 84% | 5 days ago 90% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 5 days ago 82% | 5 days ago 85% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 5 days ago 79% | 5 days ago 81% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 6 days ago 83% | 5 days ago 83% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | N/A | 18 days ago 90% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 5 days ago 90% | 5 days ago 90% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 5 days ago 78% | 5 days ago 90% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Show more...
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
CUT and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, CUT has been closely correlated with AMCR. These tickers have moved in lockstep 67% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if CUT jumps, then AMCR could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To CUT | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CUT | 100% | -0.31% | ||
| AMCR - CUT | 67% Closely correlated | N/A | ||
| WFG - CUT | 55% Loosely correlated | -1.14% | ||
| SLVM - CUT | 54% Loosely correlated | N/A | ||
| MAGN - CUT | 50% Loosely correlated | +0.84% | ||
| PACK - CUT | 43% Loosely correlated | +0.27% | ||
More | ||||
LITP and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, LITP has been closely correlated with ALB. These tickers have moved in lockstep 77% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if LITP jumps, then ALB could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To LITP | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| LITP | 100% | +4.26% | ||
| ALB - LITP | 77% Closely correlated | -1.15% | ||
| SQM - LITP | 77% Closely correlated | -0.77% | ||
| PLL - LITP | 72% Closely correlated | -1.51% | ||
| LAR - LITP | 72% Closely correlated | -0.85% | ||
| LAC - LITP | 64% Loosely correlated | -1.85% | ||
More | ||||