Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CUT vs LITP
CUT vs LITP Comparison
Open Charts CUT vs LITP
Invesco MSCI Global Timber ETF
Price$30.91
Change+$1.07 (+3.59%)
Volume$217
Net Assets37.19M
Sprott Lithium Miners ETF
Price$12.75
Change-$0.93 (-6.80%)
Volume$100
Net Assets59.4M
CUT vs LITP Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CUT vs. LITP commentary
Feb 04, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CUT is a Hold and LITP is a Hold.
SUMMARIES
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
LITP has more net assets: 59.4M vs. CUT (37.2M). LITP has a higher annual dividend yield than CUT: LITP (13.528) vs CUT (2.691). CUT was incepted earlier than LITP: CUT (18 years) vs LITP (3 years). LITP (0.65) has a lower expense ratio than CUT (0.74). LITP has a higher turnover CUT (26.00) vs CUT (26.00).
| CUT | LITP | CUT / LITP | |
| Gain YTD | 2.691 | 13.528 | 20% |
| Net Assets | 37.2M | 59.4M | 63% |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.74 | 0.65 | 114% |
| Turnover | 26.00 | 49.00 | 53% |
| Yield | 2.40 | 6.76 | 35% |
| Fund Existence | 18 years | 3 years | - |
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
| CUT | LITP | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 90% | 2 days ago 90% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 85% | 2 days ago 78% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 73% | 2 days ago 90% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 79% | 2 days ago 81% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 82% | 2 days ago 90% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 74% | 2 days ago 88% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 81% | 2 days ago 88% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 6 days ago 82% | 6 days ago 90% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 88% | 2 days ago 77% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 73% | 2 days ago 88% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers
CUT and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, CUT has been loosely correlated with SLVM. These tickers have moved in lockstep 54% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if CUT jumps, then SLVM could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To CUT | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CUT | 100% | +0.10% | ||
| SLVM - CUT | 54% Loosely correlated | -1.34% | ||
| PACK - CUT | 42% Loosely correlated | +0.80% | ||
| SEM - CUT | 8% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
| IP - CUT | 6% Poorly correlated | +3.37% | ||
| CLW - CUT | 4% Poorly correlated | -3.97% | ||
More | ||||
LITP and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, LITP has been closely correlated with SQM. These tickers have moved in lockstep 71% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if LITP jumps, then SQM could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To LITP | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| LITP | 100% | +5.07% | ||
| SQM - LITP | 71% Closely correlated | +5.38% | ||
| ALB - LITP | 71% Closely correlated | +3.46% | ||
| SGML - LITP | 67% Closely correlated | +11.35% | ||
| LAR - LITP | 58% Loosely correlated | +6.75% | ||
| LAC - LITP | 58% Loosely correlated | +8.61% | ||
More | ||||