Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CUT vs LITP
CUT vs LITP Comparison
Open Charts CUT vs LITP
Invesco MSCI Global Timber ETF
Price$30.66
Change-$0.30 (-0.97%)
Volume$100
Net Assets45.04M
Sprott Lithium Miners ETF
Price$7.95
Change-$0.38 (-4.56%)
Volume$1.8K
Net Assets21.16M
CUT vs LITP Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
Show more...
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CUT vs. LITP commentary
Sep 09, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CUT is a StrongBuy and LITP is a Hold.
SUMMARIES
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CUT has more net assets: 45M vs. LITP (21.2M). LITP has a higher annual dividend yield than CUT: LITP (24.701) vs CUT (-2.217). CUT was incepted earlier than LITP: CUT (18 years) vs LITP (3 years). LITP (0.65) has a lower expense ratio than CUT (0.74). LITP has a higher turnover CUT (32.00) vs CUT (32.00).
| CUT | LITP | CUT / LITP | |
| Gain YTD | -2.217 | 24.701 | -9% |
| Net Assets | 45M | 21.2M | 212% |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.74 | 0.65 | 114% |
| Turnover | 32.00 | 49.00 | 65% |
| Yield | 3.11 | 5.41 | 58% |
| Fund Existence | 18 years | 3 years | - |
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
| CUT | LITP | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | N/A | 1 day ago 90% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 84% | 1 day ago 90% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 86% | 1 day ago 89% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 77% | 1 day ago 90% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 80% | 1 day ago 86% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 77% | 1 day ago 84% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 5 days ago 82% | 1 day ago 84% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 7 days ago 82% | 6 days ago 90% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 90% | 1 day ago 77% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 70% | 1 day ago 90% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Show more...
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
CUT and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor tells us that CUT and AMCR have been poorly correlated (+18% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that CUT and AMCR's prices will move in lockstep.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To CUT | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CUT | 100% | -0.10% | ||
| AMCR - CUT | 18% Poorly correlated | -0.96% | ||
| GPK - CUT | 14% Poorly correlated | -2.14% | ||
| MERC - CUT | 12% Poorly correlated | -0.93% | ||
| AVY - CUT | 11% Poorly correlated | +0.19% | ||
| SON - CUT | 10% Poorly correlated | -0.11% | ||
More | ||||
LITP and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, LITP has been closely correlated with SQM. These tickers have moved in lockstep 76% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if LITP jumps, then SQM could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To LITP | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| LITP | 100% | +1.22% | ||
| SQM - LITP | 76% Closely correlated | -0.83% | ||
| ALB - LITP | 76% Closely correlated | +0.56% | ||
| SGML - LITP | 67% Closely correlated | -2.95% | ||
| LAC - LITP | 64% Loosely correlated | +2.77% | ||
| LAR - LITP | 49% Loosely correlated | -6.52% | ||
More | ||||