CUT | LITP | CUT / LITP | |
Gain YTD | -10.196 | 45.060 | -23% |
Net Assets | 41.1M | 28.3M | 145% |
Total Expense Ratio | 0.74 | 0.65 | 114% |
Turnover | 32.00 | 49.00 | 65% |
Yield | 3.26 | 4.91 | 66% |
Fund Existence | 18 years | 3 years | - |
CUT | LITP | |
---|---|---|
RSI ODDS (%) | 4 days ago90% | 4 days ago83% |
Stochastic ODDS (%) | 4 days ago79% | 4 days ago90% |
Momentum ODDS (%) | 4 days ago80% | 4 days ago90% |
MACD ODDS (%) | 4 days ago82% | 4 days ago83% |
TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 4 days ago79% | 4 days ago87% |
TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 4 days ago79% | 4 days ago85% |
Advances ODDS (%) | 7 days ago81% | 7 days ago84% |
Declines ODDS (%) | 5 days ago81% | 4 days ago90% |
BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 4 days ago90% | 4 days ago90% |
Aroon ODDS (%) | 4 days ago76% | 4 days ago84% |
A.I.dvisor tells us that CUT and PACK have been poorly correlated (+10% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that CUT and PACK's prices will move in lockstep.
Ticker / NAME | Correlation To CUT | 1D Price Change % | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
CUT | 100% | +0.58% | ||
PACK - CUT | 10% Poorly correlated | -7.25% | ||
SEM - CUT | 6% Poorly correlated | +0.22% | ||
IP - CUT | 5% Poorly correlated | -0.13% | ||
CLW - CUT | 4% Poorly correlated | -1.35% | ||
SLVM - CUT | 3% Poorly correlated | +0.07% | ||
More |
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, LITP has been closely correlated with SQM. These tickers have moved in lockstep 71% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if LITP jumps, then SQM could also see price increases.
Ticker / NAME | Correlation To LITP | 1D Price Change % | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
LITP | 100% | -3.68% | ||
SQM - LITP | 71% Closely correlated | -1.71% | ||
ALB - LITP | 69% Closely correlated | -2.68% | ||
LAR - LITP | 69% Closely correlated | -1.70% | ||
SGML - LITP | 68% Closely correlated | -8.41% | ||
LAC - LITP | 58% Loosely correlated | -8.12% | ||
More |