Intraday Buy/Sell Signals
Intraday Buy/Sell Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CUT vs LITP
CUT vs LITP Comparison
Open Charts CUT vs LITP
Invesco MSCI Global Timber ETF
Price$28.58
Change+$0.14 (+0.49%)
Volume$157
Net Assets41.13M
Sprott Lithium Miners ETF
Price$9.98
Change+$0.29 (+2.99%)
Volume$100
Net Assets28.35M
CUT vs LITP Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
Show more...
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CUT vs. LITP commentary
Oct 21, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CUT is a Hold and LITP is a Hold.
SUMMARIES
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CUT has more net assets: 41.1M vs. LITP (28.3M). LITP has a higher annual dividend yield than CUT: LITP (45.060) vs CUT (-10.196). CUT was incepted earlier than LITP: CUT (18 years) vs LITP (3 years). LITP (0.65) has a lower expense ratio than CUT (0.74). LITP has a higher turnover CUT (32.00) vs CUT (32.00).
| CUT | LITP | CUT / LITP | |
| Gain YTD | -10.196 | 45.060 | -23% |
| Net Assets | 41.1M | 28.3M | 145% |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.74 | 0.65 | 114% |
| Turnover | 32.00 | 49.00 | 65% |
| Yield | 3.26 | 4.91 | 66% |
| Fund Existence | 18 years | 3 years | - |
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
| CUT | LITP | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 90% | 4 days ago 83% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 79% | 4 days ago 90% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 80% | 4 days ago 90% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 82% | 4 days ago 83% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 79% | 4 days ago 87% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 79% | 4 days ago 85% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 7 days ago 81% | 7 days ago 84% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 5 days ago 81% | 4 days ago 90% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 90% | 4 days ago 90% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 76% | 4 days ago 84% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Show more...
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
CUT and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor tells us that CUT and PACK have been poorly correlated (+10% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that CUT and PACK's prices will move in lockstep.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To CUT | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CUT | 100% | +0.58% | ||
| PACK - CUT | 10% Poorly correlated | -7.25% | ||
| SEM - CUT | 6% Poorly correlated | +0.22% | ||
| IP - CUT | 5% Poorly correlated | -0.13% | ||
| CLW - CUT | 4% Poorly correlated | -1.35% | ||
| SLVM - CUT | 3% Poorly correlated | +0.07% | ||
More | ||||
LITP and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, LITP has been closely correlated with SQM. These tickers have moved in lockstep 71% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if LITP jumps, then SQM could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To LITP | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| LITP | 100% | -3.68% | ||
| SQM - LITP | 71% Closely correlated | -1.71% | ||
| ALB - LITP | 69% Closely correlated | -2.68% | ||
| LAR - LITP | 69% Closely correlated | -1.70% | ||
| SGML - LITP | 68% Closely correlated | -8.41% | ||
| LAC - LITP | 58% Loosely correlated | -8.12% | ||
More | ||||