Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CUT vs LITP
CUT vs LITP Comparison
Open Charts CUT vs LITP
Invesco MSCI Global Timber ETF
Price$30.06
Change-$0.63 (-2.05%)
Volume$2.73K
Net Assets47.58M
Sprott Lithium Miners ETF
Price$5.67
Change-$0.05 (-0.87%)
Volume$7.93K
Net Assets12.68M
CUT vs LITP Comparison Chart
Loading...
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CUT vs. LITP commentary
Jun 16, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CUT is a Hold and LITP is a Hold.
SUMMARIES
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CUT has more net assets: 47.6M vs. LITP (12.7M). CUT has a higher annual dividend yield than LITP: CUT (-5.081) vs LITP (-15.120). CUT was incepted earlier than LITP: CUT (18 years) vs LITP (2 years). LITP (0.65) has a lower expense ratio than CUT (0.74). LITP has a higher turnover CUT (32.00) vs CUT (32.00).
| CUT | LITP | CUT / LITP | |
| Gain YTD | -5.081 | -15.120 | 34% |
| Net Assets | 47.6M | 12.7M | 375% |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.74 | 0.65 | 114% |
| Turnover | 32.00 | 49.00 | 65% |
| Yield | 3.17 | 8.46 | 37% |
| Fund Existence | 18 years | 2 years | - |
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
| LITP | |
|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 82% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 90% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 77% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 90% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 85% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 90% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 5 days ago 83% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 90% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 90% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 90% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
CUT and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, CUT has been loosely correlated with AMCR. These tickers have moved in lockstep 65% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if CUT jumps, then AMCR could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To CUT | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CUT | 100% | -2.05% | ||
| AMCR - CUT | 65% Loosely correlated | -1.52% | ||
| WFG - CUT | 54% Loosely correlated | -1.02% | ||
| SLVM - CUT | 53% Loosely correlated | -3.78% | ||
| MAGN - CUT | 48% Loosely correlated | -7.49% | ||
| PACK - CUT | 43% Loosely correlated | -5.18% | ||
More | ||||
LITP and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, LITP has been closely correlated with ALB. These tickers have moved in lockstep 77% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if LITP jumps, then ALB could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To LITP | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| LITP | 100% | -0.87% | ||
| ALB - LITP | 77% Closely correlated | -2.18% | ||
| SQM - LITP | 77% Closely correlated | -1.71% | ||
| PLL - LITP | 72% Closely correlated | -2.73% | ||
| LAR - LITP | 70% Closely correlated | -0.50% | ||
| LAC - LITP | 63% Loosely correlated | +0.76% | ||
More | ||||