Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CUT vs LITP
CUT vs LITP Comparison
Open Charts CUT vs LITP
Invesco MSCI Global Timber ETF
Price$28.57
Change+$0.14 (+0.49%)
Volume$9.02K
Net Assets41.22M
Sprott Lithium Miners ETF
Price$10.88
Change+$0.39 (+3.72%)
Volume$65.09K
Net Assets30.41M
CUT vs LITP Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CUT vs. LITP commentary
Nov 14, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CUT is a StrongBuy and LITP is a StrongBuy.
SUMMARIES
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CUT has more net assets: 41.2M vs. LITP (30.4M). LITP has a higher annual dividend yield than CUT: LITP (57.036) vs CUT (-10.227). CUT was incepted earlier than LITP: CUT (18 years) vs LITP (3 years). LITP (0.65) has a lower expense ratio than CUT (0.74). LITP has a higher turnover CUT (32.00) vs CUT (32.00).
| CUT | LITP | CUT / LITP | |
| Gain YTD | -10.227 | 57.036 | -18% |
| Net Assets | 41.2M | 30.4M | 136% |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.74 | 0.65 | 114% |
| Turnover | 32.00 | 49.00 | 65% |
| Yield | 3.44 | 4.31 | 80% |
| Fund Existence | 18 years | 3 years | - |
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
| CUT | LITP | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 90% | 2 days ago 90% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 84% | 2 days ago 90% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 81% | 2 days ago 90% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 78% | 2 days ago 88% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 79% | 2 days ago 87% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 75% | 2 days ago 90% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 80% | 2 days ago 85% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 17 days ago 82% | 10 days ago 90% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 88% | N/A |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 81% | 2 days ago 90% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers
CUT and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, CUT has been loosely correlated with AMCR. These tickers have moved in lockstep 64% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if CUT jumps, then AMCR could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To CUT | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CUT | 100% | -0.02% | ||
| AMCR - CUT | 64% Loosely correlated | -0.59% | ||
| SLVM - CUT | 55% Loosely correlated | -0.21% | ||
| WFG - CUT | 54% Loosely correlated | +1.84% | ||
| PACK - CUT | 40% Loosely correlated | +2.55% | ||
| BILL - CUT | 32% Poorly correlated | +11.49% | ||
More | ||||
LITP and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, LITP has been closely correlated with SQM. These tickers have moved in lockstep 71% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if LITP jumps, then SQM could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To LITP | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| LITP | 100% | +1.60% | ||
| SQM - LITP | 71% Closely correlated | +2.11% | ||
| ALB - LITP | 70% Closely correlated | +6.20% | ||
| LAR - LITP | 69% Closely correlated | +2.95% | ||
| SGML - LITP | 67% Closely correlated | -0.34% | ||
| LAC - LITP | 59% Loosely correlated | -1.42% | ||
More | ||||