CUT | IWTR | CUT / IWTR | |
Gain YTD | -2.896 | 15.233 | -19% |
Net Assets | 45.9M | 6.68M | 687% |
Total Expense Ratio | 0.74 | 0.47 | 157% |
Turnover | 32.00 | 53.00 | 60% |
Yield | 3.28 | 1.62 | 202% |
Fund Existence | 18 years | 3 years | - |
CUT | IWTR | |
---|---|---|
RSI ODDS (%) | N/A | 4 days ago88% |
Stochastic ODDS (%) | 4 days ago87% | 4 days ago77% |
Momentum ODDS (%) | 4 days ago80% | 4 days ago62% |
MACD ODDS (%) | 4 days ago90% | 4 days ago64% |
TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 4 days ago82% | 4 days ago78% |
TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 4 days ago79% | 4 days ago64% |
Advances ODDS (%) | 4 days ago82% | 6 days ago78% |
Declines ODDS (%) | 12 days ago81% | 19 days ago67% |
BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 4 days ago90% | 6 days ago76% |
Aroon ODDS (%) | 4 days ago75% | 4 days ago63% |
A.I.dvisor tells us that CUT and RYN have been poorly correlated (+23% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that CUT and RYN's prices will move in lockstep.
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, IWTR has been closely correlated with WTS. These tickers have moved in lockstep 67% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if IWTR jumps, then WTS could also see price increases.
Ticker / NAME | Correlation To IWTR | 1D Price Change % | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
IWTR | 100% | +0.26% | ||
WTS - IWTR | 67% Closely correlated | +0.60% | ||
XYL - IWTR | 64% Loosely correlated | -0.58% | ||
FELE - IWTR | 62% Loosely correlated | -1.29% | ||
TXN - IWTR | 61% Loosely correlated | +0.70% | ||
ZWS - IWTR | 56% Loosely correlated | -0.88% | ||
More |