Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CUT vs HAP
CUT vs HAP Comparison
Open Charts CUT vs HAP
Invesco MSCI Global Timber ETF
Price$31.28
Change-$0.10 (-0.32%)
Volume$806
Net Assets48.59M
VanEck Natural Resources ETF
Price$53.59
Change+$0.06 (+0.11%)
Volume$3.44K
Net Assets163.28M
CUT vs HAP Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
Show more...
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CUT vs. HAP commentary
Jul 07, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CUT is a Buy and HAP is a StrongBuy.
SUMMARIES
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
HAP has more net assets: 163M vs. CUT (48.6M). HAP has a higher annual dividend yield than CUT: HAP (17.522) vs CUT (-1.206). CUT was incepted earlier than HAP: CUT (18 years) vs HAP (17 years). HAP (0.42) has a lower expense ratio than CUT (0.74). HAP has a higher turnover CUT (32.00) vs CUT (32.00).
| CUT | HAP | CUT / HAP | |
| Gain YTD | -1.206 | 17.522 | -7% |
| Net Assets | 48.6M | 163M | 30% |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.74 | 0.42 | 176% |
| Turnover | 32.00 | 54.00 | 59% |
| Yield | 3.21 | 2.33 | 138% |
| Fund Existence | 18 years | 17 years | - |
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
| CUT | HAP | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | N/A | 4 days ago 90% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 83% | 4 days ago 74% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 81% | 4 days ago 88% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 84% | 4 days ago 89% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 82% | 4 days ago 81% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 79% | 4 days ago 80% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 5 days ago 83% | 4 days ago 81% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | N/A | 7 days ago 73% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 90% | 4 days ago 84% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 78% | 4 days ago 81% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Show more...
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
CUT and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, CUT has been closely correlated with AMCR. These tickers have moved in lockstep 67% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if CUT jumps, then AMCR could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To CUT | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CUT | 100% | -0.31% | ||
| AMCR - CUT | 67% Closely correlated | -0.62% | ||
| WFG - CUT | 55% Loosely correlated | N/A | ||
| SLVM - CUT | 54% Loosely correlated | +0.45% | ||
| MAGN - CUT | 50% Loosely correlated | +0.84% | ||
| PACK - CUT | 43% Loosely correlated | +0.27% | ||
More | ||||
HAP and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, HAP has been closely correlated with SHEL. These tickers have moved in lockstep 77% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if HAP jumps, then SHEL could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To HAP | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| HAP | 100% | +0.11% | ||
| SHEL - HAP | 77% Closely correlated | -0.50% | ||
| E - HAP | 76% Closely correlated | -1.68% | ||
| RIO - HAP | 74% Closely correlated | -1.93% | ||
| WDS - HAP | 73% Closely correlated | -0.32% | ||
| FANG - HAP | 67% Closely correlated | +0.50% | ||
More | ||||