Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CUT vs HAP
CUT vs HAP Comparison
Open Charts CUT vs HAP
Invesco MSCI Global Timber ETF
Price$29.27
Change+$0.12 (+0.41%)
Volume$2.55K
Net Assets42.28M
VanEck Natural Resources ETF
Price$57.13
Change+$0.46 (+0.81%)
Volume$3.48K
Net Assets174.31M
CUT vs HAP Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
Show more...
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CUT vs. HAP commentary
Sep 28, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CUT is a Hold and HAP is a Buy.
SUMMARIES
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
HAP has more net assets: 174M vs. CUT (42.3M). HAP has a higher annual dividend yield than CUT: HAP (25.296) vs CUT (-7.559). CUT was incepted earlier than HAP: CUT (18 years) vs HAP (17 years). HAP (0.42) has a lower expense ratio than CUT (0.74). HAP has a higher turnover CUT (32.00) vs CUT (32.00).
| CUT | HAP | CUT / HAP | |
| Gain YTD | -7.559 | 25.296 | -30% |
| Net Assets | 42.3M | 174M | 24% |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.74 | 0.42 | 176% |
| Turnover | 32.00 | 54.00 | 59% |
| Yield | 3.11 | 2.18 | 143% |
| Fund Existence | 18 years | 17 years | - |
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
| CUT | HAP | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 90% | 3 days ago 83% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 80% | 3 days ago 74% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 80% | N/A |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 83% | 3 days ago 85% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 80% | 3 days ago 83% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 78% | 3 days ago 83% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 6 days ago 82% | 3 days ago 83% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 81% | 11 days ago 73% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 90% | 3 days ago 73% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 76% | 3 days ago 83% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Show more...
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
CUT and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor tells us that CUT and PACK have been poorly correlated (+8% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that CUT and PACK's prices will move in lockstep.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To CUT | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CUT | 100% | +0.43% | ||
| PACK - CUT | 8% Poorly correlated | +3.32% | ||
| SEM - CUT | 7% Poorly correlated | +1.85% | ||
| IP - CUT | 5% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
| CLW - CUT | 3% Poorly correlated | +1.35% | ||
| MERC - CUT | 2% Poorly correlated | +1.49% | ||
More | ||||
HAP and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, HAP has been closely correlated with SHEL. These tickers have moved in lockstep 75% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if HAP jumps, then SHEL could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y