Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CUT vs GMET
CUT vs GMET Comparison
Open Charts CUT vs GMET
Invesco MSCI Global Timber ETF
Price$28.57
Change+$0.14 (+0.49%)
Volume$9.02K
Net Assets41.22M
VanEck Green Metals ETF
Price$32.54
Change-$0.25 (-0.76%)
Volume$634
Net Assets24.47M
CUT vs GMET Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CUT vs. GMET commentary
Nov 14, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CUT is a StrongBuy and GMET is a Hold.
SUMMARIES
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CUT has more net assets: 41.2M vs. GMET (24.5M). GMET has a higher annual dividend yield than CUT: GMET (57.412) vs CUT (-10.227). CUT was incepted earlier than GMET: CUT (18 years) vs GMET (4 years). GMET (0.61) has a lower expense ratio than CUT (0.74). CUT has a higher turnover GMET (20.00) vs GMET (20.00).
| CUT | GMET | CUT / GMET | |
| Gain YTD | -10.227 | 57.412 | -18% |
| Net Assets | 41.2M | 24.5M | 168% |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.74 | 0.61 | 121% |
| Turnover | 32.00 | 20.00 | 160% |
| Yield | 3.44 | 1.22 | 282% |
| Fund Existence | 18 years | 4 years | - |
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
| CUT | GMET | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 90% | 3 days ago 90% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 84% | 3 days ago 89% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 81% | 3 days ago 90% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 78% | 3 days ago 90% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 79% | 3 days ago 87% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 75% | 3 days ago 86% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 80% | 5 days ago 86% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 18 days ago 82% | 11 days ago 89% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 88% | 3 days ago 89% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 81% | 3 days ago 84% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers
CUT and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, CUT has been loosely correlated with AMCR. These tickers have moved in lockstep 64% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if CUT jumps, then AMCR could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To CUT | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CUT | 100% | -0.02% | ||
| AMCR - CUT | 64% Loosely correlated | -0.59% | ||
| SLVM - CUT | 55% Loosely correlated | -0.21% | ||
| WFG - CUT | 54% Loosely correlated | +1.84% | ||
| PACK - CUT | 40% Loosely correlated | +2.55% | ||
| BILL - CUT | 32% Poorly correlated | +11.49% | ||
More | ||||
GMET and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, GMET has been loosely correlated with LAC. These tickers have moved in lockstep 35% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if GMET jumps, then LAC could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To GMET | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| GMET | 100% | +0.94% | ||
| LAC - GMET | 35% Loosely correlated | -1.42% | ||
| SGML - GMET | 22% Poorly correlated | -0.34% | ||
| SQM - GMET | 20% Poorly correlated | +2.11% | ||
| ALB - GMET | 19% Poorly correlated | +6.20% | ||
| TECK - GMET | 15% Poorly correlated | +1.86% | ||
More | ||||