Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CUT vs GMET
CUT vs GMET Comparison
Open Charts CUT vs GMET
Invesco MSCI Global Timber ETF
Price$30.59
Change-$0.06 (-0.20%)
Volume$334
Net Assets46.29M
VanEck Green Metals ETF
Price$26.21
Change+$0.18 (+0.69%)
Volume$1.03K
Net Assets21.02M
CUT vs GMET Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
Show more...
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CUT vs. GMET commentary
Aug 17, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CUT is a Buy and GMET is a StrongBuy.
SUMMARIES
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CUT has more net assets: 46.3M vs. GMET (21M). GMET has a higher annual dividend yield than CUT: GMET (24.948) vs CUT (-3.208). CUT was incepted earlier than GMET: CUT (18 years) vs GMET (4 years). GMET (0.61) has a lower expense ratio than CUT (0.74). CUT has a higher turnover GMET (20.00) vs GMET (20.00).
| CUT | GMET | CUT / GMET | |
| Gain YTD | -3.208 | 24.948 | -13% |
| Net Assets | 46.3M | 21M | 220% |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.74 | 0.61 | 121% |
| Turnover | 32.00 | 20.00 | 160% |
| Yield | 3.28 | 1.63 | 201% |
| Fund Existence | 18 years | 4 years | - |
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
| CUT | GMET | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | N/A | 3 days ago 90% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 90% | 3 days ago 90% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 77% | 3 days ago 84% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 88% | 3 days ago 90% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 81% | 3 days ago 86% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 78% | 3 days ago 81% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 82% | 9 days ago 84% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 17 days ago 81% | 17 days ago 90% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 83% | 3 days ago 88% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 78% | 3 days ago 86% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Show more...
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
CUT and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor tells us that CUT and AMCR have been poorly correlated (+13% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that CUT and AMCR's prices will move in lockstep.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To CUT | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CUT | 100% | -1.94% | ||
| AMCR - CUT | 13% Poorly correlated | -11.87% | ||
| GPK - CUT | 11% Poorly correlated | -2.12% | ||
| SON - CUT | 9% Poorly correlated | -1.31% | ||
| CLW - CUT | 8% Poorly correlated | -3.82% | ||
| MERC - CUT | 8% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
More | ||||
GMET and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor tells us that GMET and SQM have been poorly correlated (+12% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that GMET and SQM's prices will move in lockstep.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To GMET | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| GMET | 100% | -0.89% | ||
| SQM - GMET | 12% Poorly correlated | -1.96% | ||
| LAR - GMET | 11% Poorly correlated | -2.60% | ||
| AAL - GMET | 9% Poorly correlated | -2.21% | ||
| ALB - GMET | 8% Poorly correlated | -0.29% | ||
| AMS - GMET | 6% Poorly correlated | +0.19% | ||
More | ||||