Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CUT vs FMAT
CUT vs FMAT Comparison
Open Charts CUT vs FMAT
Invesco MSCI Global Timber ETF
Price$29.84
Change+$1.22 (+4.26%)
Volume$2.39K
Net Assets37.19M
Fidelity MSCI Materials ETF
Price$59.40
Change+$7.48 (+14.41%)
Volume$133.27K
Net Assets511.25M
CUT vs FMAT Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CUT vs. FMAT commentary
Feb 04, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CUT is a Hold and FMAT is a Buy.
SUMMARIES
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FMAT has more net assets: 511M vs. CUT (37.2M). FMAT has a higher annual dividend yield than CUT: FMAT (11.843) vs CUT (2.691). CUT was incepted earlier than FMAT: CUT (18 years) vs FMAT (12 years). FMAT (0.08) has a lower expense ratio than CUT (0.74). CUT has a higher turnover FMAT (6.00) vs FMAT (6.00).
| CUT | FMAT | CUT / FMAT | |
| Gain YTD | 2.691 | 11.843 | 23% |
| Net Assets | 37.2M | 511M | 7% |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.74 | 0.08 | 881% |
| Turnover | 26.00 | 6.00 | 433% |
| Yield | 2.40 | 1.51 | 159% |
| Fund Existence | 18 years | 12 years | - |
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
| CUT | FMAT | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 90% | 1 day ago 86% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 85% | 1 day ago 84% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 73% | 1 day ago 80% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 79% | 1 day ago 82% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 82% | 1 day ago 84% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 74% | 1 day ago 80% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 81% | 1 day ago 85% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 6 days ago 82% | 6 days ago 84% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 88% | 1 day ago 90% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 73% | 1 day ago 80% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers
CUT and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, CUT has been loosely correlated with SLVM. These tickers have moved in lockstep 54% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if CUT jumps, then SLVM could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To CUT | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CUT | 100% | +0.10% | ||
| SLVM - CUT | 54% Loosely correlated | -1.34% | ||
| PACK - CUT | 42% Loosely correlated | +0.80% | ||
| SEM - CUT | 8% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
| IP - CUT | 6% Poorly correlated | +3.37% | ||
| CLW - CUT | 4% Poorly correlated | -3.97% | ||
More | ||||
FMAT and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, FMAT has been closely correlated with DD. These tickers have moved in lockstep 84% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if FMAT jumps, then DD could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To FMAT | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| FMAT | 100% | +2.18% | ||
| DD - FMAT | 84% Closely correlated | +1.96% | ||
| PPG - FMAT | 80% Closely correlated | +2.63% | ||
| AXTA - FMAT | 78% Closely correlated | -3.82% | ||
| SEE - FMAT | 76% Closely correlated | -0.10% | ||
| OLN - FMAT | 75% Closely correlated | +3.43% | ||
More | ||||