Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CUT vs FMAT
CUT vs FMAT Comparison
Open Charts CUT vs FMAT
Invesco MSCI Global Timber ETF
Price$28.87
Change+$0.45 (+1.58%)
Volume$3.68K
Net Assets36.99M
Fidelity MSCI Materials ETF
Price$51.96
Change+$0.45 (+0.87%)
Volume$500
Net Assets435.53M
CUT vs FMAT Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CUT vs. FMAT commentary
Dec 04, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CUT is a Hold and FMAT is a Buy.
SUMMARIES
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FMAT has more net assets: 436M vs. CUT (37M). FMAT has a higher annual dividend yield than CUT: FMAT (8.298) vs CUT (-10.159). CUT was incepted earlier than FMAT: CUT (18 years) vs FMAT (12 years). FMAT (0.08) has a lower expense ratio than CUT (0.74). CUT has a higher turnover FMAT (6.00) vs FMAT (6.00).
| CUT | FMAT | CUT / FMAT | |
| Gain YTD | -10.159 | 8.298 | -122% |
| Net Assets | 37M | 436M | 8% |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.74 | 0.08 | 881% |
| Turnover | 32.00 | 6.00 | 533% |
| Yield | 3.34 | 1.66 | 201% |
| Fund Existence | 18 years | 12 years | - |
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
| CUT | FMAT | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 6 days ago 82% | 6 days ago 88% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 6 days ago 83% | 6 days ago 83% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 6 days ago 74% | 6 days ago 80% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 6 days ago 86% | 6 days ago 83% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 6 days ago 78% | 6 days ago 83% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 6 days ago 80% | 6 days ago 80% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 6 days ago 80% | 6 days ago 84% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 14 days ago 82% | 17 days ago 84% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 6 days ago 90% | 6 days ago 85% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 6 days ago 79% | 6 days ago 74% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers
CUT and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, CUT has been loosely correlated with AMCR. These tickers have moved in lockstep 64% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if CUT jumps, then AMCR could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To CUT | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CUT | 100% | -1.13% | ||
| AMCR - CUT | 64% Loosely correlated | -1.58% | ||
| SLVM - CUT | 56% Loosely correlated | -0.21% | ||
| WFG - CUT | 56% Loosely correlated | -0.10% | ||
| PACK - CUT | 42% Loosely correlated | -0.20% | ||
| BILL - CUT | 36% Loosely correlated | -0.79% | ||
More | ||||
FMAT and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, FMAT has been closely correlated with DD. These tickers have moved in lockstep 84% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if FMAT jumps, then DD could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To FMAT | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| FMAT | 100% | -0.78% | ||
| DD - FMAT | 84% Closely correlated | -0.99% | ||
| AVNT - FMAT | 80% Closely correlated | -1.39% | ||
| PPG - FMAT | 80% Closely correlated | +0.41% | ||
| APD - FMAT | 80% Closely correlated | -1.56% | ||
| AXTA - FMAT | 77% Closely correlated | +0.23% | ||
More | ||||