Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CUT vs FMAT
CUT vs FMAT Comparison
Open Charts CUT vs FMAT
Invesco MSCI Global Timber ETF
Price$28.51
Change+$0.08 (+0.28%)
Volume$900
Net Assets41.22M
Fidelity MSCI Materials ETF
Price$50.72
Change-$0.41 (-0.80%)
Volume$1.27K
Net Assets421.81M
CUT vs FMAT Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CUT vs. FMAT commentary
Nov 14, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CUT is a StrongBuy and FMAT is a Buy.
SUMMARIES
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FMAT has more net assets: 422M vs. CUT (41.2M). FMAT has a higher annual dividend yield than CUT: FMAT (7.505) vs CUT (-10.227). CUT was incepted earlier than FMAT: CUT (18 years) vs FMAT (12 years). FMAT (0.08) has a lower expense ratio than CUT (0.74). CUT has a higher turnover FMAT (6.00) vs FMAT (6.00).
| CUT | FMAT | CUT / FMAT | |
| Gain YTD | -10.227 | 7.505 | -136% |
| Net Assets | 41.2M | 422M | 10% |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.74 | 0.08 | 881% |
| Turnover | 32.00 | 6.00 | 533% |
| Yield | 3.44 | 1.73 | 198% |
| Fund Existence | 18 years | 12 years | - |
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
| CUT | FMAT | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 90% | 2 days ago 90% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 84% | 2 days ago 81% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 81% | 2 days ago 83% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 78% | 2 days ago 85% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 79% | 2 days ago 84% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 75% | 2 days ago 80% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 80% | 2 days ago 84% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 17 days ago 82% | 10 days ago 83% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 88% | 2 days ago 88% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 81% | 2 days ago 73% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers
CUT and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, CUT has been loosely correlated with AMCR. These tickers have moved in lockstep 64% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if CUT jumps, then AMCR could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To CUT | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CUT | 100% | -0.02% | ||
| AMCR - CUT | 64% Loosely correlated | -0.59% | ||
| SLVM - CUT | 55% Loosely correlated | -0.21% | ||
| WFG - CUT | 54% Loosely correlated | +1.84% | ||
| PACK - CUT | 40% Loosely correlated | +2.55% | ||
| BILL - CUT | 32% Poorly correlated | +11.49% | ||
More | ||||
FMAT and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, FMAT has been closely correlated with DD. These tickers have moved in lockstep 84% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if FMAT jumps, then DD could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To FMAT | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| FMAT | 100% | +0.83% | ||
| DD - FMAT | 84% Closely correlated | +0.97% | ||
| AVNT - FMAT | 80% Closely correlated | -1.17% | ||
| PPG - FMAT | 80% Closely correlated | +1.65% | ||
| APD - FMAT | 80% Closely correlated | -0.26% | ||
| AXTA - FMAT | 77% Closely correlated | +1.10% | ||
More | ||||