Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CUT vs DMAT
CUT vs DMAT Comparison
Open Charts CUT vs DMAT
Invesco MSCI Global Timber ETF
Price$30.94
Change+$0.36 (+1.18%)
Volume$234
Net Assets44.16M
Global X Disruptive Materials ETF
Price$21.30
Change+$0.70 (+3.40%)
Volume$471
Net Assets5.53M
CUT vs DMAT Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
Show more...
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CUT vs. DMAT commentary
Sep 06, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CUT is a Hold and DMAT is a Hold.
SUMMARIES
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CUT has more net assets: 44.2M vs. DMAT (5.53M). DMAT has a higher annual dividend yield than CUT: DMAT (47.040) vs CUT (-3.432). CUT was incepted earlier than DMAT: CUT (18 years) vs DMAT (4 years). DMAT (0.59) has a lower expense ratio than CUT (0.74). CUT has a higher turnover DMAT (22.42) vs DMAT (22.42).
| CUT | DMAT | CUT / DMAT | |
| Gain YTD | -3.432 | 47.040 | -7% |
| Net Assets | 44.2M | 5.53M | 800% |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.74 | 0.59 | 125% |
| Turnover | 32.00 | 22.42 | 143% |
| Yield | 3.11 | 1.09 | 285% |
| Fund Existence | 18 years | 4 years | - |
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
| CUT | DMAT | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | N/A | 2 days ago 75% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 86% | 2 days ago 87% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 88% | 2 days ago 90% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 84% | 2 days ago 78% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 80% | 2 days ago 85% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 77% | 2 days ago 81% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 15 days ago 82% | 8 days ago 82% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 82% | 17 days ago 84% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 90% | 2 days ago 90% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 74% | 2 days ago 81% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Show more...
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
CUT and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor tells us that CUT and AMCR have been poorly correlated (+19% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that CUT and AMCR's prices will move in lockstep.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To CUT | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CUT | 100% | +0.40% | ||
| AMCR - CUT | 19% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
| GPK - CUT | 13% Poorly correlated | -0.05% | ||
| MERC - CUT | 12% Poorly correlated | +1.59% | ||
| SON - CUT | 10% Poorly correlated | -0.94% | ||
| AVY - CUT | 10% Poorly correlated | +0.14% | ||
More | ||||
DMAT and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor tells us that DMAT and ALB have been poorly correlated (+17% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that DMAT and ALB's prices will move in lockstep.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To DMAT | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| DMAT | 100% | -2.44% | ||
| ALB - DMAT | 17% Poorly correlated | -1.05% | ||
| AMS - DMAT | 12% Poorly correlated | +1.59% | ||
| AMG - DMAT | 9% Poorly correlated | +1.04% | ||
| NIC - DMAT | 6% Poorly correlated | +1.21% | ||
| LAC - DMAT | 6% Poorly correlated | -2.45% | ||
More | ||||