Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CUT vs DMAT
CUT vs DMAT Comparison
Open Charts CUT vs DMAT
Invesco MSCI Global Timber ETF
Price$28.86
Change+$0.13 (+0.45%)
Volume$2.83K
Net Assets37.43M
Global X Disruptive Materials ETF
Price$28.16
Change+$0.29 (+1.04%)
Volume$4.71K
Net Assets19.54M
CUT vs DMAT Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CUT vs. DMAT commentary
Dec 26, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CUT is a Hold and DMAT is a Buy.
SUMMARIES
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CUT has more net assets: 37.4M vs. DMAT (19.5M). DMAT has a higher annual dividend yield than CUT: DMAT (100.905) vs CUT (-8.864). CUT was incepted earlier than DMAT: CUT (18 years) vs DMAT (4 years). DMAT (0.59) has a lower expense ratio than CUT (0.74). CUT has a higher turnover DMAT (22.42) vs DMAT (22.42).
| CUT | DMAT | CUT / DMAT | |
| Gain YTD | -8.864 | 100.905 | -9% |
| Net Assets | 37.4M | 19.5M | 192% |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.74 | 0.59 | 125% |
| Turnover | 32.00 | 22.42 | 143% |
| Yield | 3.34 | 0.90 | 371% |
| Fund Existence | 18 years | 4 years | - |
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
| CUT | DMAT | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 82% | 2 days ago 70% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 78% | 2 days ago 86% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 86% | 2 days ago 83% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 80% | 2 days ago 69% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 82% | 2 days ago 86% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 74% | 2 days ago 82% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 80% | 2 days ago 84% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 83% | 11 days ago 83% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 90% | 2 days ago 78% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 73% | 2 days ago 83% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers
CUT and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, CUT has been loosely correlated with AMCR. These tickers have moved in lockstep 63% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if CUT jumps, then AMCR could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To CUT | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CUT | 100% | +0.44% | ||
| AMCR - CUT | 63% Loosely correlated | -0.12% | ||
| WFG - CUT | 56% Loosely correlated | -0.15% | ||
| SLVM - CUT | 54% Loosely correlated | +0.18% | ||
| PACK - CUT | 40% Loosely correlated | +1.58% | ||
| BILL - CUT | 36% Loosely correlated | +0.11% | ||
More | ||||
DMAT and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, DMAT has been loosely correlated with LAC. These tickers have moved in lockstep 35% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if DMAT jumps, then LAC could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To DMAT | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| DMAT | 100% | +1.05% | ||
| LAC - DMAT | 35% Loosely correlated | +1.89% | ||
| ALB - DMAT | 28% Poorly correlated | +1.23% | ||
| AMG - DMAT | 16% Poorly correlated | -0.40% | ||
| EAF - DMAT | 12% Poorly correlated | +3.79% | ||
| AMS - DMAT | 9% Poorly correlated | +1.94% | ||
More | ||||