CUSI
Price
$18.04
Change
+$0.04 (+0.22%)
Updated
Sep 4 closing price
Capitalization
43.9M
FPAFF
Price
$0.85
Change
+$0.02 (+2.41%)
Updated
Aug 29 closing price
Capitalization
3.6B
Interact to see
Advertisement

CUSI vs FPAFF

Header iconCUSI vs FPAFF Comparison
Open Charts CUSI vs FPAFFBanner chart's image
Cuisine Solutions
Price$18.04
Change+$0.04 (+0.22%)
Volume$42.39K
Capitalization43.9M
First Pacific
Price$0.85
Change+$0.02 (+2.41%)
Volume$30.25K
Capitalization3.6B
CUSI vs FPAFF Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
CUSI
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
FPAFF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
CUSI vs. FPAFF commentary
Sep 06, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CUSI is a Buy and FPAFF is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Sep 06, 2025
Stock price -- (CUSI: $18.04 vs. FPAFF: $0.85)
Brand notoriety: CUSI and FPAFF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Food: Major Diversified industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: CUSI: 413% vs. FPAFF: 258%
Market capitalization -- CUSI: $43.9M vs. FPAFF: $3.6B
CUSI [@Food: Major Diversified] is valued at $43.9M. FPAFF’s [@Food: Major Diversified] market capitalization is $3.6B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Food: Major Diversified] industry ranges from $242.42B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Food: Major Diversified] industry is $7.12B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

CUSI’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileFPAFF’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).

  • CUSI’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
  • FPAFF’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
According to our system of comparison, FPAFF is a better buy in the long-term than CUSI.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

CUSI’s TA Score shows that 2 TA indicator(s) are bullish while FPAFF’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • CUSI’s TA Score: 2 bullish, 1 bearish.
  • FPAFF’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 3 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, FPAFF is a better buy in the short-term than CUSI.

Price Growth

CUSI (@Food: Major Diversified) experienced а +0.22% price change this week, while FPAFF (@Food: Major Diversified) price change was +2.79% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Food: Major Diversified industry was -0.61%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +2.21%, and the average quarterly price growth was +821.65%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Food: Major Diversified (-0.61% weekly)

Companies in this industry usually make a diverse range of agricultural and/or processed food. Some prominent names in this segment are Mondelez International, which makes chocolates, biscuits, cookies etc. The Kraft Heinz Company specializes in ketchups, sauces, fruit drink pouches and many more. General Mills, Inc. sells flour and cereal. Kellogg is famous for its snacks and breakfast cereal. And so on down the line. As more and more consumers are looking for healthier options in food in recent years, several legacy food companies have responded by revamping brands to include organic and no-added-sugar versions, and/or acquiring healthy food firms, and even streamlining operations.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FPAFF($3.6B) has a higher market cap than CUSI($43.9M). FPAFF YTD gains are higher at: 50.442 vs. CUSI (0.272). CUSI has less debt than FPAFF: CUSI (5.79M) vs FPAFF (11.7B).
CUSIFPAFFCUSI / FPAFF
Capitalization43.9M3.6B1%
EBITDAN/AN/A-
Gain YTD0.27250.4421%
P/E RatioN/A5.07-
RevenueN/AN/A-
Total CashN/A2.35B-
Total Debt5.79M11.7B0%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
CUSI vs FPAFF: Fundamental Ratings
CUSI
FPAFF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
5031
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
1
Undervalued
17
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
328
SMR RATING
1..100
9262
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
5740
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
10043
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
50n/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

CUSI's Valuation (1) in the null industry is in the same range as FPAFF (17). This means that CUSI’s stock grew similarly to FPAFF’s over the last 12 months.

FPAFF's Profit vs Risk Rating (8) in the null industry is in the same range as CUSI (32). This means that FPAFF’s stock grew similarly to CUSI’s over the last 12 months.

FPAFF's SMR Rating (62) in the null industry is in the same range as CUSI (92). This means that FPAFF’s stock grew similarly to CUSI’s over the last 12 months.

FPAFF's Price Growth Rating (40) in the null industry is in the same range as CUSI (57). This means that FPAFF’s stock grew similarly to CUSI’s over the last 12 months.

FPAFF's P/E Growth Rating (43) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for CUSI (100). This means that FPAFF’s stock grew somewhat faster than CUSI’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
CUSIFPAFF
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
66%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
17%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
69%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
84%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
32%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
77%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
33%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
71%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
33%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
71%
Advances
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend about 1 month ago
61%
Declines
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
61%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
38%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
72%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
CUSI
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
FPAFF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
FOREX / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
CHFRUB100.72N/A
N/A
Switzerland Franc - Russia Ruble
GBPCAD1.85N/A
N/A
United Kingdom Pound - Canadian Dollar
AUDHKD5.10N/A
N/A
Australian Dollar - Hong Kong Dollar
JPYNZD0.01N/A
N/A
Japan Yen - New Zealand Dollar
SMIN73.28-0.29
-0.39%
iShares MSCI India Small-Cap ETF

CUSI and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that CUSI and FPAFF have been poorly correlated (+16% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that CUSI and FPAFF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To CUSI
1D Price
Change %
CUSI100%
+0.22%
FPAFF - CUSI
16%
Poorly correlated
N/A
CIADF - CUSI
7%
Poorly correlated
N/A
FPAFY - CUSI
3%
Poorly correlated
+1.16%
CVNZF - CUSI
0%
Poorly correlated
N/A
CFOO - CUSI
0%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More

FPAFF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that FPAFF and BRRLY have been poorly correlated (+20% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that FPAFF and BRRLY's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To FPAFF
1D Price
Change %
FPAFF100%
N/A
BRRLY - FPAFF
20%
Poorly correlated
-0.36%
CUSI - FPAFF
16%
Poorly correlated
+0.22%
FPAFY - FPAFF
6%
Poorly correlated
+1.16%
CIADY - FPAFF
4%
Poorly correlated
+0.79%
FNEVY - FPAFF
4%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More