CULTF
Price
$0.01
Change
-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Updated
Jun 27 closing price
Capitalization
6.11M
MOOOF
Price
$0.13
Change
-$0.01 (-7.14%)
Updated
May 15 closing price
Capitalization
25.43M
Interact to see
Advertisement

CULTF vs MOOOF

Header iconCULTF vs MOOOF Comparison
Open Charts CULTF vs MOOOFBanner chart's image
Cult Food Science
Price$0.01
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Volume$59.53K
Capitalization6.11M
BETTERMOOD FOOD
Price$0.13
Change-$0.01 (-7.14%)
Volume$900
Capitalization25.43M
CULTF vs MOOOF Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
CULTF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
MOOOF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
CULTF vs. MOOOF commentary
Jun 28, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CULTF is a Hold and MOOOF is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jun 28, 2025
Stock price -- (CULTF: $0.01 vs. MOOOF: $0.13)
Brand notoriety: CULTF and MOOOF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Food: Specialty/Candy industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: CULTF: 56% vs. MOOOF: 52%
Market capitalization -- CULTF: $6.11M vs. MOOOF: $25.43M
CULTF [@Food: Specialty/Candy] is valued at $6.11M. MOOOF’s [@Food: Specialty/Candy] market capitalization is $25.43M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Food: Specialty/Candy] industry ranges from $327.81B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Food: Specialty/Candy] industry is $9.42B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

CULTF’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileMOOOF’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • CULTF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • MOOOF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, both CULTF and MOOOF are a bad buy in the long-term.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

CULTF’s TA Score shows that 0 TA indicator(s) are bullish while MOOOF’s TA Score has 1 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • CULTF’s TA Score: 0 bullish, 3 bearish.
  • MOOOF’s TA Score: 1 bullish, 1 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, MOOOF is a better buy in the short-term than CULTF.

Price Growth

CULTF (@Food: Specialty/Candy) experienced а -5.46% price change this week, while MOOOF (@Food: Specialty/Candy) price change was 0.00% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Food: Specialty/Candy industry was -0.38%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +0.26%, and the average quarterly price growth was +0.17%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Food: Specialty/Candy (-0.38% weekly)

A specialty/candy manufacturer specializes in one or more of the following: chocolate, candies, pasta, condiments, seasonings, among other items. Hershey Company, McCormick & Company and J.M. Smucker Company are some of the major firms in this segment. Demand for this industry’s products comes from both institutions/restaurants as well as households.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
MOOOF($25.4M) has a higher market cap than CULTF($6.11M). CULTF YTD gains are higher at: -56.176 vs. MOOOF (-75.346).
CULTFMOOOFCULTF / MOOOF
Capitalization6.11M25.4M24%
EBITDA-4.44MN/A-
Gain YTD-56.176-75.34675%
P/E RatioN/AN/A-
Revenue0N/A-
Total Cash940KN/A-
Total Debt47.7KN/A-
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
CULTFMOOOF
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
46%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
90%
N/A
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
29%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
21%
Advances
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Declines
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
49%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
CULTF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
MOOOF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
RNECF12.400.50
+4.20%
Renesas Electronics Corp
AGNPF0.06N/A
N/A
Algernon Pharmaceuticals Inc.
MMIRF0.05N/A
N/A
Medmira Inc.
FLMNY12.80N/A
N/A
Fielmann Group AG
CHTH3.57N/A
N/A
CNL Healthcare Pptys Inc.

CULTF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that CULTF and CIADY have been poorly correlated (+22% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that CULTF and CIADY's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To CULTF
1D Price
Change %
CULTF100%
+2.76%
CIADY - CULTF
22%
Poorly correlated
-1.78%
GWLL - CULTF
11%
Poorly correlated
N/A
MNDDF - CULTF
10%
Poorly correlated
N/A
NPRFF - CULTF
8%
Poorly correlated
-1.11%
MOOOF - CULTF
4%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More

MOOOF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that MOOOF and GFCOF have been poorly correlated (+5% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that MOOOF and GFCOF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To MOOOF
1D Price
Change %
MOOOF100%
N/A
GFCOF - MOOOF
5%
Poorly correlated
+1.90%
CULTF - MOOOF
4%
Poorly correlated
+2.76%
CELV - MOOOF
2%
Poorly correlated
-12.24%
GWLL - MOOOF
-0%
Poorly correlated
N/A
MNDDF - MOOOF
-0%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More