CUCSF
Price
Loading...
Change
-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Updated
Loading...
Capitalization
4.29B
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
TRKNY
Price
$2.67
Change
+$0.29 (+12.18%)
Updated
Nov 7 closing price
Capitalization
4.72B
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

CUCSF vs TRKNY

Header iconCUCSF vs TRKNY Comparison
Open Charts CUCSF vs TRKNYBanner chart's image
China Communications Services
PriceLoading...
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Volume$900
Capitalization4.29B
Turk Telekomunikasyon
Price$2.67
Change+$0.29 (+12.18%)
Volume$306
Capitalization4.72B
CUCSF vs TRKNY Comparison Chart in %
CUCSF
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
TRKNY
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
CUCSF vs. TRKNY commentary
Nov 14, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CUCSF is a StrongBuy and TRKNY is a Buy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Nov 14, 2025
Stock price -- (CUCSF: $0.55 vs. TRKNY: $2.67)
Brand notoriety: CUCSF and TRKNY are both not notable
Both companies represent the Major Telecommunications industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: CUCSF: 48% vs. TRKNY: 21%
Market capitalization -- CUCSF: $4.29B vs. TRKNY: $4.72B
CUCSF [@Major Telecommunications] is valued at $4.29B. TRKNY’s [@Major Telecommunications] market capitalization is $4.72B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Major Telecommunications] industry ranges from $240B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Major Telecommunications] industry is $19.48B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

CUCSF’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileTRKNY’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).

  • CUCSF’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
  • TRKNY’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
According to our system of comparison, CUCSF is a better buy in the long-term than TRKNY.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

CUCSF’s TA Score shows that 2 TA indicator(s) are bullish while TRKNY’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • CUCSF’s TA Score: 2 bullish, 2 bearish.
  • TRKNY’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, both CUCSF and TRKNY are a good buy in the short-term.

Price Growth

CUCSF (@Major Telecommunications) experienced а 0.00% price change this week, while TRKNY (@Major Telecommunications) price change was +12.18% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Major Telecommunications industry was +0.34%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +0.36%, and the average quarterly price growth was +16.33%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Major Telecommunications (+0.34% weekly)

Major telecommunications include companies that make communication possible across the globe – by providing voice and data transmission via multiple channels such as phone or the Internet, through airwaves or cables, through wires or wirelessly. The ease with which we connect with anyone, anywhere in the world is thanks in large part to the infrastructure created by the telecom industry. Some major telecom players include AT&T Inc., Verizon Communications Inc. and Nippon Telegraph and Telephone Corporation.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
TRKNY($4.72B) has a higher market cap than CUCSF($4.29B). TRKNY has higher P/E ratio than CUCSF: TRKNY (11.48) vs CUCSF (7.45). CUCSF YTD gains are higher at: 26.215 vs. TRKNY (8.647). TRKNY has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 89.4B vs. CUCSF (4.24B). CUCSF has more cash in the bank: 14.2B vs. TRKNY (9.59B). CUCSF has less debt than TRKNY: CUCSF (2.03B) vs TRKNY (65.9B). TRKNY has higher revenues than CUCSF: TRKNY (210B) vs CUCSF (153B).
CUCSFTRKNYCUCSF / TRKNY
Capitalization4.29B4.72B91%
EBITDA4.24B89.4B5%
Gain YTD26.2158.647303%
P/E Ratio7.4511.4865%
Revenue153B210B73%
Total Cash14.2B9.59B148%
Total Debt2.03B65.9B3%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
CUCSF vs TRKNY: Fundamental Ratings
CUCSF
TRKNY
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
3930
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
20
Undervalued
3
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
10059
SMR RATING
1..100
1973
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
4958
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
5313
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
5920

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

TRKNY's Valuation (3) in the null industry is in the same range as CUCSF (20). This means that TRKNY’s stock grew similarly to CUCSF’s over the last 12 months.

TRKNY's Profit vs Risk Rating (59) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for CUCSF (100). This means that TRKNY’s stock grew somewhat faster than CUCSF’s over the last 12 months.

CUCSF's SMR Rating (19) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for TRKNY (73). This means that CUCSF’s stock grew somewhat faster than TRKNY’s over the last 12 months.

CUCSF's Price Growth Rating (49) in the null industry is in the same range as TRKNY (58). This means that CUCSF’s stock grew similarly to TRKNY’s over the last 12 months.

TRKNY's P/E Growth Rating (13) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for CUCSF (53). This means that TRKNY’s stock grew somewhat faster than CUCSF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
CUCSFTRKNY
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
71%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
73%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
33%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
68%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
27%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
63%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
19%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
59%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
19%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
57%
Advances
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Declines
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
61%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
6%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
52%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
CUCSF
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
TRKNY
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
GPIGX13.930.05
+0.40%
Guidepath® Growth and Income
MPSIX23.260.08
+0.35%
Principal MidCap S&P 400 Index Inst
BLNIX14.040.02
+0.14%
Meeder Balanced Institutional
VWENX84.550.07
+0.08%
Vanguard Wellington Admiral
ASVHX9.92N/A
N/A
American Century Small Cap Value G

CUCSF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that CUCSF and TTRAF have been poorly correlated (+17% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that CUCSF and TTRAF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To CUCSF
1D Price
Change %
CUCSF100%
N/A
TTRAF - CUCSF
17%
Poorly correlated
N/A
HTWSF - CUCSF
5%
Poorly correlated
-0.19%
MYTEF - CUCSF
1%
Poorly correlated
N/A
FRTAY - CUCSF
0%
Poorly correlated
N/A
TRKNY - CUCSF
0%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More

TRKNY and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that TRKNY and TRAGF have been poorly correlated (+27% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that TRKNY and TRAGF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To TRKNY
1D Price
Change %
TRKNY100%
N/A
TRAGF - TRKNY
27%
Poorly correlated
N/A
HKTTF - TRKNY
21%
Poorly correlated
N/A
TIMB - TRKNY
6%
Poorly correlated
-2.06%
TLTZY - TRKNY
6%
Poorly correlated
-1.13%
CUCSF - TRKNY
0%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More