CUCSF
Price
$0.56
Change
-$0.08 (-12.50%)
Updated
Aug 7 closing price
Capitalization
4.26B
PTTWF
Price
$2.05
Change
+$0.46 (+28.93%)
Updated
Aug 2 closing price
Capitalization
3.1B
Interact to see
Advertisement

CUCSF vs PTTWF

Header iconCUCSF vs PTTWF Comparison
Open Charts CUCSF vs PTTWFBanner chart's image
China Communications Services
Price$0.56
Change-$0.08 (-12.50%)
Volume$100
Capitalization4.26B
Orange Polska SA
Price$2.05
Change+$0.46 (+28.93%)
Volume$300
Capitalization3.1B
CUCSF vs PTTWF Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
CUCSF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
CUCSF vs. PTTWF commentary
Aug 18, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CUCSF is a Hold and PTTWF is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Aug 18, 2025
Stock price -- (CUCSF: $0.56 vs. PTTWF: $2.05)
Brand notoriety: CUCSF and PTTWF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Major Telecommunications industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: CUCSF: 2% vs. PTTWF: 100%
Market capitalization -- CUCSF: $4.26B vs. PTTWF: $3.1B
CUCSF [@Major Telecommunications] is valued at $4.26B. PTTWF’s [@Major Telecommunications] market capitalization is $3.1B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Major Telecommunications] industry ranges from $286.57B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Major Telecommunications] industry is $19.82B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

CUCSF’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whilePTTWF’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).

  • CUCSF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • PTTWF’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
According to our system of comparison, CUCSF is a better buy in the long-term than PTTWF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

CUCSF’s TA Score shows that 1 TA indicator(s) are bullish.

  • CUCSF’s TA Score: 1 bullish, 4 bearish.

Price Growth

CUCSF (@Major Telecommunications) experienced а 0.00% price change this week, while PTTWF (@Major Telecommunications) price change was 0.00% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Major Telecommunications industry was +1.96%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +4.47%, and the average quarterly price growth was +43.36%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Major Telecommunications (+1.96% weekly)

Major telecommunications include companies that make communication possible across the globe – by providing voice and data transmission via multiple channels such as phone or the Internet, through airwaves or cables, through wires or wirelessly. The ease with which we connect with anyone, anywhere in the world is thanks in large part to the infrastructure created by the telecom industry. Some major telecom players include AT&T Inc., Verizon Communications Inc. and Nippon Telegraph and Telephone Corporation.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CUCSF($4.26B) has a higher market cap than PTTWF($3.1B). PTTWF has higher P/E ratio than CUCSF: PTTWF (13.94) vs CUCSF (7.74). CUCSF YTD gains are higher at: 29.986 vs. PTTWF (0.000).
CUCSFPTTWFCUCSF / PTTWF
Capitalization4.26B3.1B138%
EBITDAN/A4.08B-
Gain YTD29.9860.000-
P/E Ratio7.7413.9455%
RevenueN/A12.8B-
Total CashN/A648M-
Total DebtN/A7.44B-
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
CUCSF vs PTTWF: Fundamental Ratings
CUCSF
PTTWF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
5050
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
22
Undervalued
15
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
10082
SMR RATING
1..100
7679
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
4470
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
5719
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
5050

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

PTTWF's Valuation (15) in the null industry is in the same range as CUCSF (22). This means that PTTWF’s stock grew similarly to CUCSF’s over the last 12 months.

PTTWF's Profit vs Risk Rating (82) in the null industry is in the same range as CUCSF (100). This means that PTTWF’s stock grew similarly to CUCSF’s over the last 12 months.

CUCSF's SMR Rating (76) in the null industry is in the same range as PTTWF (79). This means that CUCSF’s stock grew similarly to PTTWF’s over the last 12 months.

CUCSF's Price Growth Rating (44) in the null industry is in the same range as PTTWF (70). This means that CUCSF’s stock grew similarly to PTTWF’s over the last 12 months.

PTTWF's P/E Growth Rating (19) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for CUCSF (57). This means that PTTWF’s stock grew somewhat faster than CUCSF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
CUCSFPTTWF
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
67%
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
27%
N/A
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
36%
N/A
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
33%
N/A
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
17%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
15%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
27%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
13%
Advances
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Declines
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Aroon
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
CUCSF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
QID23.380.24
+1.04%
ProShares UltraShort QQQ
FGM58.180.19
+0.33%
First Trust Germany AlphaDEX® ETF
FRDM42.150.02
+0.05%
Freedom 100 Emerging Markets ETF
IWTR34.12N/A
N/A
iShares MSCI Water Mgmt Mltsctr ETF
UPSD25.59-0.03
-0.11%
Aptus Large Cap Upside ETF

CUCSF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that CUCSF and TTRAF have been poorly correlated (+17% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that CUCSF and TTRAF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To CUCSF
1D Price
Change %
CUCSF100%
N/A
TTRAF - CUCSF
17%
Poorly correlated
-8.21%
HTWSF - CUCSF
5%
Poorly correlated
N/A
KORE - CUCSF
3%
Poorly correlated
-6.17%
MYTEF - CUCSF
1%
Poorly correlated
N/A
FRTAY - CUCSF
0%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More

PTTWF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that PTTWF and TLSNF have been poorly correlated (+25% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that PTTWF and TLSNF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To PTTWF
1D Price
Change %
PTTWF100%
N/A
TLSNF - PTTWF
25%
Poorly correlated
N/A
BCE - PTTWF
22%
Poorly correlated
+0.95%
HTWSF - PTTWF
2%
Poorly correlated
N/A
CUCSF - PTTWF
0%
Poorly correlated
N/A
LMGHF - PTTWF
0%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More