CUCSF
Price
Loading...
Change
-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Updated
Loading...
Capitalization
4.31B
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
HTWSF
Price
$2.15
Change
+$0.04 (+1.90%)
Updated
Dec 3 closing price
Capitalization
2.2B
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

CUCSF vs HTWSF

Header iconCUCSF vs HTWSF Comparison
Open Charts CUCSF vs HTWSFBanner chart's image
China Communications Services
PriceLoading...
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Volume$900
Capitalization4.31B
Helios Towers
Price$2.15
Change+$0.04 (+1.90%)
Volume$8.85K
Capitalization2.2B
CUCSF vs HTWSF Comparison Chart in %
CUCSF
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
HTWSF
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
CUCSF vs. HTWSF commentary
Dec 05, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CUCSF is a Buy and HTWSF is a Buy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Dec 05, 2025
Stock price -- (CUCSF: $0.55 vs. HTWSF: $2.14)
Brand notoriety: CUCSF and HTWSF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Major Telecommunications industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: CUCSF: 115% vs. HTWSF: 175%
Market capitalization -- CUCSF: $4.31B vs. HTWSF: $2.2B
CUCSF [@Major Telecommunications] is valued at $4.31B. HTWSF’s [@Major Telecommunications] market capitalization is $2.2B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Major Telecommunications] industry ranges from $233.22B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Major Telecommunications] industry is $18.86B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

CUCSF’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileHTWSF’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • CUCSF’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
  • HTWSF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, CUCSF is a better buy in the long-term than HTWSF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

CUCSF’s TA Score shows that 0 TA indicator(s) are bullish while HTWSF’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • CUCSF’s TA Score: 0 bullish, 1 bearish.
  • HTWSF’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 3 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, HTWSF is a better buy in the short-term than CUCSF.

Price Growth

CUCSF (@Major Telecommunications) experienced а 0.00% price change this week, while HTWSF (@Major Telecommunications) price change was +2.63% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Major Telecommunications industry was +0.43%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +7.54%, and the average quarterly price growth was +16.28%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Major Telecommunications (+0.43% weekly)

Major telecommunications include companies that make communication possible across the globe – by providing voice and data transmission via multiple channels such as phone or the Internet, through airwaves or cables, through wires or wirelessly. The ease with which we connect with anyone, anywhere in the world is thanks in large part to the infrastructure created by the telecom industry. Some major telecom players include AT&T Inc., Verizon Communications Inc. and Nippon Telegraph and Telephone Corporation.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CUCSF($4.31B) has a higher market cap than HTWSF($2.2B). HTWSF has higher P/E ratio than CUCSF: HTWSF (28.22) vs CUCSF (7.40). HTWSF YTD gains are higher at: 100.467 vs. CUCSF (26.215). CUCSF has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 4.24B vs. HTWSF (487M). CUCSF has more cash in the bank: 14.2B vs. HTWSF (184M). HTWSF (1.95B) and CUCSF (2.03B) have identical debt. CUCSF has higher revenues than HTWSF: CUCSF (153B) vs HTWSF (820M).
CUCSFHTWSFCUCSF / HTWSF
Capitalization4.31B2.2B196%
EBITDA4.24B487M870%
Gain YTD26.215100.46726%
P/E Ratio7.4028.2226%
Revenue153B820M18,659%
Total Cash14.2B184M7,717%
Total Debt2.03B1.95B104%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
CUCSF: Fundamental Ratings
CUCSF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
41
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
25
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
100
SMR RATING
1..100
19
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
53
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
53
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
59

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
CUCSFHTWSF
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
54%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
56%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
66%
MACD
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
47%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
19%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
47%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
19%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
52%
Advances
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 7 days ago
67%
Declines
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
62%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
17%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
63%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
CUCSF
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
HTWSF
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
WFDSX33.230.25
+0.76%
Allspring SMID Cap Growth Fund - Cl Inst
ATGAX40.800.30
+0.74%
Cantor Fitzgerald Equity Opp A
TINCX2.880.02
+0.70%
Templeton Global Dynamic Income A1
RGICX46.270.25
+0.54%
American Funds Intl Gr and Inc R3
CBHMX8.68N/A
N/A
Victory Market Neutral Income Member

CUCSF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that CUCSF and TTRAF have been poorly correlated (+17% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that CUCSF and TTRAF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To CUCSF
1D Price
Change %
CUCSF100%
N/A
TTRAF - CUCSF
17%
Poorly correlated
N/A
HTWSF - CUCSF
5%
Poorly correlated
+2.14%
MYTEF - CUCSF
1%
Poorly correlated
N/A
FRTAY - CUCSF
0%
Poorly correlated
N/A
TRKNY - CUCSF
0%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More

HTWSF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that HTWSF and LBTYA have been poorly correlated (+25% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that HTWSF and LBTYA's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To HTWSF
1D Price
Change %
HTWSF100%
+2.14%
LBTYA - HTWSF
25%
Poorly correlated
-1.31%
SFTBY - HTWSF
24%
Poorly correlated
+6.37%
LBTYK - HTWSF
23%
Poorly correlated
-1.76%
SKM - HTWSF
23%
Poorly correlated
+1.25%
VDMCY - HTWSF
22%
Poorly correlated
+0.77%
More