CUB
Price
$10.50
Change
-$0.01 (-0.10%)
Updated
Sep 24 closing price
Capitalization
322M
SZZL
Price
$10.08
Change
-$0.05 (-0.49%)
Updated
Sep 25 closing price
Capitalization
315.17M
Interact to see
Advertisement

CUB vs SZZL

Header iconCUB vs SZZL Comparison
Open Charts CUB vs SZZLBanner chart's image
Lionheart Holdings
Price$10.50
Change-$0.01 (-0.10%)
Volume$6.9K
Capitalization322M
Sizzle Acquisition Corp II
Price$10.08
Change-$0.05 (-0.49%)
Volume$227
Capitalization315.17M
CUB vs SZZL Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
CUB
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
CUB vs. SZZL commentary
Sep 26, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CUB is a Buy and SZZL is a StrongBuy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Sep 26, 2025
Stock price -- (CUB: $10.50 vs. SZZL: $10.08)
Brand notoriety: CUB and SZZL are both not notable
Both companies represent the Financial Conglomerates industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: CUB: 20% vs. SZZL: 0%
Market capitalization -- CUB: $322M vs. SZZL: $315.17M
CUB [@Financial Conglomerates] is valued at $322M. SZZL’s [@Financial Conglomerates] market capitalization is $315.17M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Financial Conglomerates] industry ranges from $590.24B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Financial Conglomerates] industry is $173.9M.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

CUB’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileSZZL’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • CUB’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
  • SZZL’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, CUB is a better buy in the long-term than SZZL.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

CUB’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish.

  • CUB’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 2 bearish.

Price Growth

CUB (@Financial Conglomerates) experienced а 0.00% price change this week, while SZZL (@Financial Conglomerates) price change was +0.10% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Financial Conglomerates industry was +0.93%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +0.22%, and the average quarterly price growth was +17.93%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Financial Conglomerates (+0.93% weekly)

Financial conglomerates usually encompass a wide range of financial services including (not necessarily limited to) investment banking, insurance, capital raising/underwriting, trading of financial securities, investment advisory services, wealth management of high net-worth individuals, and retail banking. Think Citigroup, American Express Company, ING Group.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CUB($322M) and SZZL($315M) have the same market capitalization . SZZL has more cash in the bank: 1.12M vs. CUB (569K).
CUBSZZLCUB / SZZL
Capitalization322M315M102%
EBITDAN/AN/A-
Gain YTD3.960N/A-
P/E RatioN/AN/A-
RevenueN/AN/A-
Total Cash569K1.12M51%
Total DebtN/A262K-
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
CUB: Fundamental Ratings
CUB
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
29
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
100
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
100
SMR RATING
1..100
16
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
57
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
10
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
56

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
CUB
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
46%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
40%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
25%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
34%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
34%
Advances
ODDS (%)
N/A
Declines
ODDS (%)
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
7%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
18%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
CUB
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
RIVRX36.16N/A
N/A
Riverbridge Growth Investor
IASTX24.68N/A
N/A
Macquarie Asset Strategy Fund Cl R6
GRHIX18.16N/A
N/A
Goehring & Rozencwajg Resources Instl
MUTHX26.78N/A
N/A
Franklin Mutual Shares Z
RFISX17.65N/A
N/A
Ranger Small Cap Institutional

CUB and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, CUB has been loosely correlated with OAKUU. These tickers have moved in lockstep 52% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if CUB jumps, then OAKUU could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To CUB
1D Price
Change %
CUB100%
N/A
OAKUU - CUB
52%
Loosely correlated
N/A
ATROB - CUB
35%
Loosely correlated
N/A
DPRO - CUB
33%
Loosely correlated
-1.93%
SGGKY - CUB
30%
Poorly correlated
N/A
CCIX - CUB
15%
Poorly correlated
+0.47%
More

SZZL and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that SZZL and ALF have been poorly correlated (+9% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that SZZL and ALF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To SZZL
1D Price
Change %
SZZL100%
-0.49%
ALF - SZZL
9%
Poorly correlated
+0.09%
CUB - SZZL
6%
Poorly correlated
N/A
NHIC - SZZL
2%
Poorly correlated
N/A
CEP - SZZL
2%
Poorly correlated
-4.60%
PORT - SZZL
1%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More