CUAEF
Price
$4.00
Change
-$0.05 (-1.23%)
Updated
Jul 2 closing price
Capitalization
75.88B
GCLMF
Price
$0.04
Change
-$0.02 (-33.33%)
Updated
Apr 30 closing price
Capitalization
5.33M
Interact to see
Advertisement

CUAEF vs GCLMF

Header iconCUAEF vs GCLMF Comparison
Open Charts CUAEF vs GCLMFBanner chart's image
China Shenhua Energy
Price$4.00
Change-$0.05 (-1.23%)
Volume$410
Capitalization75.88B
GCM Resources
Price$0.04
Change-$0.02 (-33.33%)
Volume$35.6K
Capitalization5.33M
CUAEF vs GCLMF Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
CUAEF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
CUAEF vs. GCLMF commentary
Jul 28, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CUAEF is a Hold and GCLMF is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jul 28, 2025
Stock price -- (CUAEF: $4.00 vs. GCLMF: $0.04)
Brand notoriety: CUAEF and GCLMF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Coal industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: CUAEF: 44% vs. GCLMF: 100%
Market capitalization -- CUAEF: $75.88B vs. GCLMF: $5.33M
CUAEF [@Coal] is valued at $75.88B. GCLMF’s [@Coal] market capitalization is $5.33M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Coal] industry ranges from $75.88B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Coal] industry is $6.72B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

CUAEF’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileGCLMF’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • CUAEF’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
  • GCLMF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, CUAEF is a better buy in the long-term than GCLMF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

CUAEF’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish.

  • CUAEF’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 3 bearish.

Price Growth

CUAEF (@Coal) experienced а 0.00% price change this week, while GCLMF (@Coal) price change was 0.00% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Coal industry was +5.88%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +17.97%, and the average quarterly price growth was +13.51%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Coal (+5.88% weekly)

Companies that mine, process and distribute coal and lignite. Coal goes towards around 30% of global energy production, and is heavily relied upon for electricity generation. Alliance Resource Partners, L.P., Peabody Energy Corporation and Arch Coal Inc. are major coal companies in the U.S.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CUAEF($75.9B) has a higher market cap than GCLMF($5.33M). GCLMF YTD gains are higher at: 270.000 vs. CUAEF (-12.088). CUAEF has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 96.8B vs. GCLMF (-1.13M). CUAEF has more cash in the bank: 186B vs. GCLMF (740K). GCLMF has less debt than CUAEF: GCLMF (4.94M) vs CUAEF (55.2B). CUAEF has higher revenues than GCLMF: CUAEF (348B) vs GCLMF (0).
CUAEFGCLMFCUAEF / GCLMF
Capitalization75.9B5.33M1,422,947%
EBITDA96.8B-1.13M-8,573,959%
Gain YTD-12.088270.000-4%
P/E Ratio5.88N/A-
Revenue348B0-
Total Cash186B740K25,135,135%
Total Debt55.2B4.94M1,117,409%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
CUAEF vs GCLMF: Fundamental Ratings
CUAEF
GCLMF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
5050
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
24
Undervalued
49
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
22100
SMR RATING
1..100
5990
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
6139
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
61100
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/a42

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

CUAEF's Valuation (24) in the null industry is in the same range as GCLMF (49). This means that CUAEF’s stock grew similarly to GCLMF’s over the last 12 months.

CUAEF's Profit vs Risk Rating (22) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for GCLMF (100). This means that CUAEF’s stock grew significantly faster than GCLMF’s over the last 12 months.

CUAEF's SMR Rating (59) in the null industry is in the same range as GCLMF (90). This means that CUAEF’s stock grew similarly to GCLMF’s over the last 12 months.

GCLMF's Price Growth Rating (39) in the null industry is in the same range as CUAEF (61). This means that GCLMF’s stock grew similarly to CUAEF’s over the last 12 months.

CUAEF's P/E Growth Rating (61) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for GCLMF (100). This means that CUAEF’s stock grew somewhat faster than GCLMF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
CUAEFGCLMF
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
50%
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
55%
N/A
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
40%
N/A
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
55%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
12%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
22%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
11%
Advances
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Declines
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
13%
N/A
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
CUAEF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
CLF11.440.53
+4.86%
Cleveland-Cliffs
CVS60.701.95
+3.32%
CVS HEALTH Corp
MSW2.990.03
+1.01%
Ming Shing Group Holdings Ltd
NRIM89.33N/A
N/A
Northrim BanCorp
ANGI16.96-0.02
-0.12%
Angi Inc

CUAEF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that CUAEF and CCOZY have been poorly correlated (+7% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that CUAEF and CCOZY's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To CUAEF
1D Price
Change %
CUAEF100%
N/A
CCOZY - CUAEF
7%
Poorly correlated
+9.15%
ITAYY - CUAEF
2%
Poorly correlated
N/A
MOGLF - CUAEF
2%
Poorly correlated
-0.83%
NHPEF - CUAEF
0%
Poorly correlated
N/A
GCLMF - CUAEF
-0%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More

GCLMF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that GCLMF and NHPEF have been poorly correlated (+4% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that GCLMF and NHPEF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To GCLMF
1D Price
Change %
GCLMF100%
N/A
NHPEF - GCLMF
4%
Poorly correlated
N/A
ITAYY - GCLMF
2%
Poorly correlated
N/A
MOAEF - GCLMF
-0%
Poorly correlated
N/A
CUAEF - GCLMF
-0%
Poorly correlated
N/A
MOAEY - GCLMF
-0%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More