CTYP
Price
$5.35
Change
-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Updated
Jul 24 closing price
Capitalization
22.99M
FSGB
Price
$9.30
Change
-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Updated
Jul 21 closing price
Capitalization
N/A
Interact to see
Advertisement

CTYP vs FSGB

Header iconCTYP vs FSGB Comparison
Open Charts CTYP vs FSGBBanner chart's image
Community Bankers (PA)
Price$5.35
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Volume$1.7K
Capitalization22.99M
First Federal of South Carolina Federal Savings Bank
Price$9.30
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Volume$316
CapitalizationN/A
CTYP vs FSGB Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
CTYP
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
FSGB
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
CTYP vs. FSGB commentary
Jul 27, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CTYP is a StrongBuy and FSGB is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jul 27, 2025
Stock price -- (CTYP: $5.35 vs. FSGB: $9.30)
Brand notoriety: CTYP and FSGB are both not notable
Both companies represent the Regional Banks industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: CTYP: 191% vs. FSGB: 99%
Market capitalization -- CTYP: $22.99M vs. FSGB: $0
CTYP [@Regional Banks] is valued at $22.99M. FSGB’s [@Regional Banks] market capitalization is $0. The market cap for tickers in the [@Regional Banks] industry ranges from $133.96B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Regional Banks] industry is $6.03B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

CTYP’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileFSGB’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • CTYP’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
  • FSGB’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, CTYP is a better buy in the long-term than FSGB.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

CTYP’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish while FSGB’s TA Score has 2 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • CTYP’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 1 bearish.
  • FSGB’s TA Score: 2 bullish, 0 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, FSGB is a better buy in the short-term than CTYP.

Price Growth

CTYP (@Regional Banks) experienced а 0.00% price change this week, while FSGB (@Regional Banks) price change was 0.00% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Regional Banks industry was +0.51%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +4.61%, and the average quarterly price growth was +10.19%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Regional Banks (+0.51% weekly)

Regional banks have a smaller reach than major banks, and cater mostly to one region of a country, such as a state or within a group of states. They offer services often similar – albeit with some limitations/smaller scale – compared to major banks. Taking deposits, making loans, mortgages, leases, credit cards , fund management, insurance and investment banking. SunTrust Banks, State Street Corp., M&T Bank Corp. are some examples of U.S. regional banks.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CTYP YTD gains are higher at: 0.787 vs. FSGB (-3.125).
CTYPFSGBCTYP / FSGB
Capitalization23MN/A-
EBITDAN/AN/A-
Gain YTD0.787-3.125-25%
P/E RatioN/AN/A-
Revenue7.13MN/A-
Total CashN/AN/A-
Total Debt21.1MN/A-
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
CTYP vs FSGB: Fundamental Ratings
CTYP
FSGB
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
4950
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
15
Undervalued
26
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
84100
SMR RATING
1..100
65100
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
6177
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
1296
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/an/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

CTYP's Valuation (15) in the null industry is in the same range as FSGB (26). This means that CTYP’s stock grew similarly to FSGB’s over the last 12 months.

CTYP's Profit vs Risk Rating (84) in the null industry is in the same range as FSGB (100). This means that CTYP’s stock grew similarly to FSGB’s over the last 12 months.

CTYP's SMR Rating (65) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for FSGB (100). This means that CTYP’s stock grew somewhat faster than FSGB’s over the last 12 months.

CTYP's Price Growth Rating (61) in the null industry is in the same range as FSGB (77). This means that CTYP’s stock grew similarly to FSGB’s over the last 12 months.

CTYP's P/E Growth Rating (12) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for FSGB (96). This means that CTYP’s stock grew significantly faster than FSGB’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
CTYPFSGB
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
23%
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
37%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
23%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
45%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
27%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
31%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
20%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
45%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
26%
Advances
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Declines
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
52%
N/A
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
CTYP
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
FSGB
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
PALI1.160.05
+4.50%
Palisade Bio
CNMD50.951.39
+2.80%
CONMED Corp
DT54.15-0.07
-0.13%
Dynatrace
TBPH11.03-0.10
-0.90%
Theravance Biopharma
GNSS1.79-0.06
-3.24%
Genasys

CTYP and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that CTYP and COSO have been poorly correlated (+29% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that CTYP and COSO's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To CTYP
1D Price
Change %
CTYP100%
N/A
COSO - CTYP
29%
Poorly correlated
+1.09%
NWPP - CTYP
28%
Poorly correlated
N/A
BPHLF - CTYP
20%
Poorly correlated
N/A
BGKKF - CTYP
15%
Poorly correlated
N/A
BYLB - CTYP
14%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More

FSGB and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, FSGB has been loosely correlated with APLO. These tickers have moved in lockstep 51% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if FSGB jumps, then APLO could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To FSGB
1D Price
Change %
FSGB100%
N/A
APLO - FSGB
51%
Loosely correlated
N/A
CMTDF - FSGB
47%
Loosely correlated
N/A
ANDC - FSGB
23%
Poorly correlated
N/A
FRAF - FSGB
22%
Poorly correlated
-0.82%
CTYP - FSGB
11%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More