CTXXF
Price
$0.26
Change
-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Updated
Sep 29 closing price
Capitalization
39.31M
Intraday Buy/Sell Signals
IBJHF
Price
$2.06
Change
+$0.61 (+42.07%)
Updated
Mar 10 closing price
Capitalization
723.85M
Intraday Buy/Sell Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

CTXXF vs IBJHF

Header iconCTXXF vs IBJHF Comparison
Open Charts CTXXF vs IBJHFBanner chart's image
Cematrix
Price$0.26
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Volume$24.29K
Capitalization39.31M
Ibstock
Price$2.06
Change+$0.61 (+42.07%)
Volume$10K
Capitalization723.85M
CTXXF vs IBJHF Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
CTXXF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
CTXXF vs. IBJHF commentary
Sep 30, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CTXXF is a Hold and IBJHF is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Sep 30, 2025
Stock price -- (CTXXF: $0.26 vs. IBJHF: $2.06)
Brand notoriety: CTXXF and IBJHF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Construction Materials industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: CTXXF: 94% vs. IBJHF: 100%
Market capitalization -- CTXXF: $39.31M vs. IBJHF: $723.85M
CTXXF [@Construction Materials] is valued at $39.31M. IBJHF’s [@Construction Materials] market capitalization is $723.85M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Construction Materials] industry ranges from $76.87B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Construction Materials] industry is $9.84B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

CTXXF’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileIBJHF’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).

  • CTXXF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • IBJHF’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
According to our system of comparison, IBJHF is a better buy in the long-term than CTXXF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

CTXXF’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish.

  • CTXXF’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 5 bearish.

Price Growth

CTXXF (@Construction Materials) experienced а +11.65% price change this week, while IBJHF (@Construction Materials) price change was 0.00% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Construction Materials industry was -0.17%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -1.09%, and the average quarterly price growth was +19.04%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Construction Materials (-0.17% weekly)

Many naturally occurring substances, such as clay, rocks, sand, and wood, even twigs and leaves have been used in construction material. Many man-made products are also in use. Vulcan Materials Co., Martin Marietta Materials, Inc. and Owens Corning Inc. are examples of construction material companies in the U.S. Performance of companies that extract or produce construction materials could at times depend on demand for residential and commercial buildings/real estate, and therefore in some cases could feel impacted by economic cycles.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
IBJHF($724M) has a higher market cap than CTXXF($39.3M). IBJHF has higher P/E ratio than CTXXF: IBJHF (39.92) vs CTXXF (26.15). CTXXF YTD gains are higher at: 45.188 vs. IBJHF (42.069). IBJHF has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 66.8M vs. CTXXF (4.41M). IBJHF has more cash in the bank: 22.6M vs. CTXXF (8.55M). CTXXF has less debt than IBJHF: CTXXF (3.66M) vs IBJHF (200M). IBJHF has higher revenues than CTXXF: IBJHF (381M) vs CTXXF (37.7M).
CTXXFIBJHFCTXXF / IBJHF
Capitalization39.3M724M5%
EBITDA4.41M66.8M7%
Gain YTD45.18842.069107%
P/E Ratio26.1539.9266%
Revenue37.7M381M10%
Total Cash8.55M22.6M38%
Total Debt3.66M200M2%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
CTXXF vs IBJHF: Fundamental Ratings
CTXXF
IBJHF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
2947
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
80
Overvalued
11
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
100100
SMR RATING
1..100
8390
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
4052
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
89
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
7575

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

IBJHF's Valuation (11) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for CTXXF (80). This means that IBJHF’s stock grew significantly faster than CTXXF’s over the last 12 months.

IBJHF's Profit vs Risk Rating (100) in the null industry is in the same range as CTXXF (100). This means that IBJHF’s stock grew similarly to CTXXF’s over the last 12 months.

CTXXF's SMR Rating (83) in the null industry is in the same range as IBJHF (90). This means that CTXXF’s stock grew similarly to IBJHF’s over the last 12 months.

CTXXF's Price Growth Rating (40) in the null industry is in the same range as IBJHF (52). This means that CTXXF’s stock grew similarly to IBJHF’s over the last 12 months.

CTXXF's P/E Growth Rating (8) in the null industry is in the same range as IBJHF (9). This means that CTXXF’s stock grew similarly to IBJHF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
CTXXFIBJHF
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
81%
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
79%
N/A
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
69%
N/A
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
70%
N/A
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
69%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
15%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
72%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
14%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
72%
N/A
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 22 days ago
69%
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
77%
N/A
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
82%
N/A
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
CTXXF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
ASMIY589.2411.42
+1.98%
ASM International N.V.
ABSOF0.05N/A
N/A
ABS-CBN Holdings Corp
HISEF3.30N/A
N/A
Hisense Kelon Electrical Holdings Co Ltd.
MBOF38.93N/A
N/A
Marine Bancorp of Florida, Inc.
CSNRF3.46N/A
N/A
Chesnara Plc.

CTXXF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that CTXXF and GCWOF have been poorly correlated (+8% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that CTXXF and GCWOF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To CTXXF
1D Price
Change %
CTXXF100%
+0.96%
GCWOF - CTXXF
8%
Poorly correlated
+0.16%
CMTOY - CTXXF
6%
Poorly correlated
N/A
HLBZF - CTXXF
3%
Poorly correlated
-7.27%
HCMLF - CTXXF
2%
Poorly correlated
-3.21%
IBJHF - CTXXF
2%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More

IBJHF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, IBJHF has been loosely correlated with SUCEF. These tickers have moved in lockstep 58% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if IBJHF jumps, then SUCEF could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To IBJHF
1D Price
Change %
IBJHF100%
N/A
SUCEF - IBJHF
58%
Loosely correlated
N/A
THYCY - IBJHF
23%
Poorly correlated
N/A
FRCEF - IBJHF
16%
Poorly correlated
N/A
CTXXF - IBJHF
2%
Poorly correlated
+0.96%
HCMLF - IBJHF
1%
Poorly correlated
-3.21%
More