CTXXF
Price
$0.26
Change
+$0.01 (+4.00%)
Updated
Dec 3 closing price
Capitalization
39.24M
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
IBJHF
Price
Loading...
Change
-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Updated
Loading...
Capitalization
693.87M
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

CTXXF vs IBJHF

Header iconCTXXF vs IBJHF Comparison
Open Charts CTXXF vs IBJHFBanner chart's image
Cematrix
Price$0.26
Change+$0.01 (+4.00%)
Volume$15.03K
Capitalization39.24M
Ibstock
PriceLoading...
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Volume$170
Capitalization693.87M
CTXXF vs IBJHF Comparison Chart in %
CTXXF
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
IBJHF
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
CTXXF vs. IBJHF commentary
Dec 04, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CTXXF is a Hold and IBJHF is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Dec 04, 2025
Stock price -- (CTXXF: $0.24 vs. IBJHF: $1.70)
Brand notoriety: CTXXF and IBJHF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Construction Materials industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: CTXXF: 34% vs. IBJHF: 6%
Market capitalization -- CTXXF: $39.24M vs. IBJHF: $693.87M
CTXXF [@Construction Materials] is valued at $39.24M. IBJHF’s [@Construction Materials] market capitalization is $693.87M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Construction Materials] industry ranges from $81.25B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Construction Materials] industry is $10.6B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

CTXXF’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileIBJHF’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • CTXXF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • IBJHF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, IBJHF is a better buy in the long-term than CTXXF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

CTXXF’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish while IBJHF’s TA Score has 2 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • CTXXF’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • IBJHF’s TA Score: 2 bullish, 0 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, both CTXXF and IBJHF are a good buy in the short-term.

Price Growth

CTXXF (@Construction Materials) experienced а +2.26% price change this week, while IBJHF (@Construction Materials) price change was 0.00% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Construction Materials industry was +0.33%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +1.78%, and the average quarterly price growth was +9.99%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Construction Materials (+0.33% weekly)

Many naturally occurring substances, such as clay, rocks, sand, and wood, even twigs and leaves have been used in construction material. Many man-made products are also in use. Vulcan Materials Co., Martin Marietta Materials, Inc. and Owens Corning Inc. are examples of construction material companies in the U.S. Performance of companies that extract or produce construction materials could at times depend on demand for residential and commercial buildings/real estate, and therefore in some cases could feel impacted by economic cycles.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
IBJHF($694M) has a higher market cap than CTXXF($39.2M). IBJHF has higher P/E ratio than CTXXF: IBJHF (42.87) vs CTXXF (17.02). CTXXF YTD gains are higher at: 34.309 vs. IBJHF (17.241). IBJHF has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 66.8M vs. CTXXF (4.41M). IBJHF has more cash in the bank: 22.6M vs. CTXXF (8.55M). CTXXF has less debt than IBJHF: CTXXF (3.66M) vs IBJHF (200M). IBJHF has higher revenues than CTXXF: IBJHF (381M) vs CTXXF (37.7M).
CTXXFIBJHFCTXXF / IBJHF
Capitalization39.2M694M6%
EBITDA4.41M66.8M7%
Gain YTD34.30917.241199%
P/E Ratio17.0242.8740%
Revenue37.7M381M10%
Total Cash8.55M22.6M38%
Total Debt3.66M200M2%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
CTXXF vs IBJHF: Fundamental Ratings
CTXXF
IBJHF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
5050
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
76
Overvalued
9
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
100100
SMR RATING
1..100
8288
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
4961
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
8239
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
5050

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

IBJHF's Valuation (9) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for CTXXF (76). This means that IBJHF’s stock grew significantly faster than CTXXF’s over the last 12 months.

IBJHF's Profit vs Risk Rating (100) in the null industry is in the same range as CTXXF (100). This means that IBJHF’s stock grew similarly to CTXXF’s over the last 12 months.

CTXXF's SMR Rating (82) in the null industry is in the same range as IBJHF (88). This means that CTXXF’s stock grew similarly to IBJHF’s over the last 12 months.

CTXXF's Price Growth Rating (49) in the null industry is in the same range as IBJHF (61). This means that CTXXF’s stock grew similarly to IBJHF’s over the last 12 months.

IBJHF's P/E Growth Rating (39) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for CTXXF (82). This means that IBJHF’s stock grew somewhat faster than CTXXF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
CTXXFIBJHF
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 7 days ago
81%
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 7 days ago
86%
N/A
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 7 days ago
73%
Bullish Trend 7 days ago
8%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 7 days ago
59%
Bullish Trend 7 days ago
10%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 7 days ago
71%
Bullish Trend 7 days ago
14%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 7 days ago
80%
Bullish Trend 7 days ago
13%
Advances
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 24 days ago
71%
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 7 days ago
71%
N/A
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 7 days ago
70%
N/A
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
CTXXF
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
IBJHF
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
FTASX31.66N/A
N/A
Fidelity Advisor Asset Manager 70% M
PBEAX25.46N/A
N/A
PGIM Jennison Value A
MISEX45.18N/A
N/A
Midas Special Opportunities
ACGCX40.58N/A
N/A
American Century Discplnd Cor Val C
SILVX18.94N/A
N/A
SGI US Large Cap Equity I

CTXXF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that CTXXF and CMTOY have been poorly correlated (+7% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that CTXXF and CMTOY's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To CTXXF
1D Price
Change %
CTXXF100%
N/A
CMTOY - CTXXF
7%
Poorly correlated
N/A
GCWOF - CTXXF
5%
Poorly correlated
N/A
HLBZF - CTXXF
3%
Poorly correlated
N/A
IBJHF - CTXXF
2%
Poorly correlated
N/A
HCMLF - CTXXF
2%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More

IBJHF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that IBJHF and SMID have been poorly correlated (+4% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that IBJHF and SMID's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To IBJHF
1D Price
Change %
IBJHF100%
N/A
SMID - IBJHF
4%
Poorly correlated
+3.40%
CTXXF - IBJHF
2%
Poorly correlated
N/A
HCMLF - IBJHF
1%
Poorly correlated
N/A
MCEM - IBJHF
1%
Poorly correlated
N/A
LKSGF - IBJHF
1%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More