CTXXF
Price
$0.25
Change
-$0.01 (-3.85%)
Updated
Oct 17 closing price
Capitalization
37.96M
GCWOF
Price
$9.08
Change
-$0.45 (-4.72%)
Updated
Oct 6 closing price
Capitalization
2.89B
Interact to see
Advertisement

CTXXF vs GCWOF

Header iconCTXXF vs GCWOF Comparison
Open Charts CTXXF vs GCWOFBanner chart's image
Cematrix
Price$0.25
Change-$0.01 (-3.85%)
Volume$27K
Capitalization37.96M
Grupo Cementos de Chihuahua SAB de CV
Price$9.08
Change-$0.45 (-4.72%)
Volume$100
Capitalization2.89B
CTXXF vs GCWOF Comparison Chart in %
CTXXF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
GCWOF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
CTXXF vs. GCWOF commentary
Oct 19, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CTXXF is a Hold and GCWOF is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Oct 19, 2025
Stock price -- (CTXXF: $0.25 vs. GCWOF: $9.08)
Brand notoriety: CTXXF and GCWOF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Construction Materials industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: CTXXF: 91% vs. GCWOF: 4%
Market capitalization -- CTXXF: $37.96M vs. GCWOF: $2.89B
CTXXF [@Construction Materials] is valued at $37.96M. GCWOF’s [@Construction Materials] market capitalization is $2.89B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Construction Materials] industry ranges from $78.74B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Construction Materials] industry is $9.97B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

CTXXF’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileGCWOF’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • CTXXF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • GCWOF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, GCWOF is a better buy in the long-term than CTXXF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

CTXXF’s TA Score shows that 6 TA indicator(s) are bullish while GCWOF’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • CTXXF’s TA Score: 6 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • GCWOF’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, CTXXF is a better buy in the short-term than GCWOF.

Price Growth

CTXXF (@Construction Materials) experienced а -1.96% price change this week, while GCWOF (@Construction Materials) price change was 0.00% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Construction Materials industry was -0.11%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -0.63%, and the average quarterly price growth was +19.75%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Construction Materials (-0.11% weekly)

Many naturally occurring substances, such as clay, rocks, sand, and wood, even twigs and leaves have been used in construction material. Many man-made products are also in use. Vulcan Materials Co., Martin Marietta Materials, Inc. and Owens Corning Inc. are examples of construction material companies in the U.S. Performance of companies that extract or produce construction materials could at times depend on demand for residential and commercial buildings/real estate, and therefore in some cases could feel impacted by economic cycles.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
GCWOF($2.89B) has a higher market cap than CTXXF($38M). CTXXF has higher P/E ratio than GCWOF: CTXXF (25.11) vs GCWOF (9.93). CTXXF YTD gains are higher at: 38.440 vs. GCWOF (3.771). GCWOF has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 420M vs. CTXXF (4.41M). GCWOF has more cash in the bank: 827M vs. CTXXF (8.55M). CTXXF has less debt than GCWOF: CTXXF (3.66M) vs GCWOF (628M). GCWOF has higher revenues than CTXXF: GCWOF (1.34B) vs CTXXF (37.7M).
CTXXFGCWOFCTXXF / GCWOF
Capitalization38M2.89B1%
EBITDA4.41M420M1%
Gain YTD38.4403.7711,019%
P/E Ratio25.119.93253%
Revenue37.7M1.34B3%
Total Cash8.55M827M1%
Total Debt3.66M628M1%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
CTXXF vs GCWOF: Fundamental Ratings
CTXXF
GCWOF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
8799
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
78
Overvalued
84
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
10045
SMR RATING
1..100
8354
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
4156
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
922
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/a30

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

CTXXF's Valuation (78) in the null industry is in the same range as GCWOF (84). This means that CTXXF’s stock grew similarly to GCWOF’s over the last 12 months.

GCWOF's Profit vs Risk Rating (45) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for CTXXF (100). This means that GCWOF’s stock grew somewhat faster than CTXXF’s over the last 12 months.

GCWOF's SMR Rating (54) in the null industry is in the same range as CTXXF (83). This means that GCWOF’s stock grew similarly to CTXXF’s over the last 12 months.

CTXXF's Price Growth Rating (41) in the null industry is in the same range as GCWOF (56). This means that CTXXF’s stock grew similarly to GCWOF’s over the last 12 months.

CTXXF's P/E Growth Rating (9) in the null industry is in the same range as GCWOF (22). This means that CTXXF’s stock grew similarly to GCWOF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
CTXXFGCWOF
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
76%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
30%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
69%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
44%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
77%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
30%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
73%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
36%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
76%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
34%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
72%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
31%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 17 days ago
72%
N/A
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
70%
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
76%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
17%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
74%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
39%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
CTXXF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
GCWOF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
RRREX21.940.15
+0.69%
DWS RREEF Real Estate Securities S
MNOSX36.630.14
+0.38%
Manning & Napier Overseas Series S
FRISX98.060.21
+0.21%
Franklin Rising Dividends R6
SSGFX64.780.01
+0.02%
Saturna Growth
SHGTX96.26-0.47
-0.49%
Columbia Seligman Global Tech A

CTXXF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that CTXXF and CMTOY have been poorly correlated (+7% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that CTXXF and CMTOY's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To CTXXF
1D Price
Change %
CTXXF100%
-1.88%
CMTOY - CTXXF
7%
Poorly correlated
N/A
GCWOF - CTXXF
5%
Poorly correlated
N/A
HLBZF - CTXXF
3%
Poorly correlated
-6.11%
IBJHF - CTXXF
2%
Poorly correlated
N/A
HCMLF - CTXXF
2%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More

GCWOF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that GCWOF and CX have been poorly correlated (+21% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that GCWOF and CX's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To GCWOF
1D Price
Change %
GCWOF100%
N/A
CX - GCWOF
21%
Poorly correlated
-0.52%
HCMLY - GCWOF
5%
Poorly correlated
-0.73%
CTXXF - GCWOF
5%
Poorly correlated
-1.88%
CMTOY - GCWOF
4%
Poorly correlated
N/A
HLBZF - GCWOF
4%
Poorly correlated
-6.11%
More