CTXAY
Price
$39.95
Change
+$0.46 (+1.16%)
Updated
Sep 5 closing price
Capitalization
4.76B
FGPR
Price
$14.79
Change
-$0.21 (-1.40%)
Updated
Sep 5 closing price
Capitalization
260.36M
Interact to see
Advertisement

CTXAY vs FGPR

Header iconCTXAY vs FGPR Comparison
Open Charts CTXAY vs FGPRBanner chart's image
Ampol
Price$39.95
Change+$0.46 (+1.16%)
Volume$623
Capitalization4.76B
Ferrellgas Partners
Price$14.79
Change-$0.21 (-1.40%)
Volume$771
Capitalization260.36M
CTXAY vs FGPR Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
CTXAY
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
FGPR
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
CTXAY vs. FGPR commentary
Sep 09, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CTXAY is a Hold and FGPR is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Sep 09, 2025
Stock price -- (CTXAY: $39.95 vs. FGPR: $14.79)
Brand notoriety: CTXAY and FGPR are both not notable
Both companies represent the Oil Refining/Marketing industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: CTXAY: 11% vs. FGPR: 8%
Market capitalization -- CTXAY: $4.76B vs. FGPR: $260.36M
CTXAY [@Oil Refining/Marketing] is valued at $4.76B. FGPR’s [@Oil Refining/Marketing] market capitalization is $260.36M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Oil Refining/Marketing] industry ranges from $55.09B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Oil Refining/Marketing] industry is $7.19B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

CTXAY’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileFGPR’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • CTXAY’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • FGPR’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, CTXAY is a better buy in the long-term than FGPR.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

CTXAY’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while FGPR’s TA Score has 3 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • CTXAY’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • FGPR’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, CTXAY is a better buy in the short-term than FGPR.

Price Growth

CTXAY (@Oil Refining/Marketing) experienced а +5.91% price change this week, while FGPR (@Oil Refining/Marketing) price change was +0.90% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Oil Refining/Marketing industry was +1.05%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +5.59%, and the average quarterly price growth was +19.50%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Oil Refining/Marketing (+1.05% weekly)

The Oil Refining/Marketing segment includes companies that refine crude oil into a number of petroleum products, including gasoline, jet fuel and diesel, and then sell the usable products to the end users. These companies are involved in what’s called downstream operations in the oil business. They also engage in the marketing and distribution of crude oil and natural gas products. In other words, the downstream oil and gas business is focused on post-production processes of crude oil and natural gas. When oil prices slump, downstream businesses are hurt less or in some cases even benefit, since their purchase cost of crude oil goes down. Some of the biggest U.S. oil refining/marketing companies include Phillips 66, Marathon Petroleum Corporation and Valero Energy Corp.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CTXAY($4.76B) has a higher market cap than FGPR($260M). CTXAY has higher P/E ratio than FGPR: CTXAY (57.00) vs FGPR (5.79). FGPR YTD gains are higher at: 86.304 vs. CTXAY (16.950).
CTXAYFGPRCTXAY / FGPR
Capitalization4.76B260M1,830%
EBITDAN/A195M-
Gain YTD16.95086.30420%
P/E Ratio57.005.79984%
RevenueN/A1.94B-
Total CashN/A109M-
Total DebtN/A1.51B-
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
FGPR: Fundamental Ratings
FGPR
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
50
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
72
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
73
SMR RATING
1..100
100
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
39
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
65
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
50

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
CTXAYFGPR
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
70%
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
82%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
69%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
90%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
71%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
65%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
66%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
90%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
63%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
88%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
61%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
54%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
62%
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
64%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 21 days ago
61%
Bearish Trend 7 days ago
88%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
59%
N/A
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
59%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
63%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
CTXAY
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
FGPR
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
IEGCX22.010.16
+0.73%
Invesco International Small Company C
CSSCX21.460.14
+0.66%
Columbia Small Cap Value Discv C
BGGSX31.330.14
+0.45%
Baillie Gifford US Equity Growth I
PFPPX11.20-0.01
-0.09%
Principal MidCap Growth R3
FCAKX47.08-0.17
-0.36%
Fidelity Capital Appreciation K

CTXAY and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that CTXAY and UGP have been poorly correlated (+28% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that CTXAY and UGP's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To CTXAY
1D Price
Change %
CTXAY100%
+1.16%
UGP - CTXAY
28%
Poorly correlated
+7.44%
DKL - CTXAY
26%
Poorly correlated
-0.07%
SUN - CTXAY
23%
Poorly correlated
-0.68%
WKC - CTXAY
23%
Poorly correlated
-0.60%
MPC - CTXAY
23%
Poorly correlated
+0.73%
More

FGPR and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that FGPR and FGPRB have been poorly correlated (+30% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that FGPR and FGPRB's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To FGPR
1D Price
Change %
FGPR100%
-1.38%
FGPRB - FGPR
30%
Poorly correlated
N/A
CTXAY - FGPR
5%
Poorly correlated
+1.16%
DINO - FGPR
3%
Poorly correlated
-0.89%
MOHCF - FGPR
2%
Poorly correlated
N/A
LCNTU - FGPR
-3%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More