CTXAF
Price
$16.30
Change
+$1.84 (+12.72%)
Updated
May 9 closing price
Capitalization
5.25B
SPTJF
Price
$0.17
Change
-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Updated
Jul 25 closing price
Capitalization
3.87B
Interact to see
Advertisement

CTXAF vs SPTJF

Header iconCTXAF vs SPTJF Comparison
Open Charts CTXAF vs SPTJFBanner chart's image
Ampol
Price$16.30
Change+$1.84 (+12.72%)
Volume$750
Capitalization5.25B
Sinopec Shanghai Petrochemical
Price$0.17
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Volume$9.3K
Capitalization3.87B
CTXAF vs SPTJF Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
SPTJF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
CTXAF vs. SPTJF commentary
Jul 28, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CTXAF is a Hold and SPTJF is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jul 28, 2025
Stock price -- (CTXAF: $16.30 vs. SPTJF: $0.17)
Brand notoriety: CTXAF and SPTJF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Oil Refining/Marketing industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: CTXAF: 100% vs. SPTJF: 23%
Market capitalization -- CTXAF: $5.25B vs. SPTJF: $3.87B
CTXAF [@Oil Refining/Marketing] is valued at $5.25B. SPTJF’s [@Oil Refining/Marketing] market capitalization is $3.87B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Oil Refining/Marketing] industry ranges from $73.66B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Oil Refining/Marketing] industry is $8.79B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

CTXAF’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileSPTJF’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • CTXAF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • SPTJF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, CTXAF is a better buy in the long-term than SPTJF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

SPTJF’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish.

  • SPTJF’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 4 bearish.

Price Growth

CTXAF (@Oil Refining/Marketing) experienced а 0.00% price change this week, while SPTJF (@Oil Refining/Marketing) price change was +18.14% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Oil Refining/Marketing industry was +1.68%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +4.07%, and the average quarterly price growth was +8.30%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Oil Refining/Marketing (+1.68% weekly)

The Oil Refining/Marketing segment includes companies that refine crude oil into a number of petroleum products, including gasoline, jet fuel and diesel, and then sell the usable products to the end users. These companies are involved in what’s called downstream operations in the oil business. They also engage in the marketing and distribution of crude oil and natural gas products. In other words, the downstream oil and gas business is focused on post-production processes of crude oil and natural gas. When oil prices slump, downstream businesses are hurt less or in some cases even benefit, since their purchase cost of crude oil goes down. Some of the biggest U.S. oil refining/marketing companies include Phillips 66, Marathon Petroleum Corporation and Valero Energy Corp.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CTXAF($5.25B) has a higher market cap than SPTJF($3.87B). SPTJF has higher P/E ratio than CTXAF: SPTJF (34.36) vs CTXAF (10.16). SPTJF YTD gains are higher at: 16.959 vs. CTXAF (1.875). CTXAF has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 1.49B vs. SPTJF (851M). SPTJF has more cash in the bank: 8.36B vs. CTXAF (126M). CTXAF has less debt than SPTJF: CTXAF (3.61B) vs SPTJF (4.29B). SPTJF has higher revenues than CTXAF: SPTJF (84.4B) vs CTXAF (38.2B).
CTXAFSPTJFCTXAF / SPTJF
Capitalization5.25B3.87B136%
EBITDA1.49B851M175%
Gain YTD1.87516.95911%
P/E Ratio10.1634.3630%
Revenue38.2B84.4B45%
Total Cash126M8.36B2%
Total Debt3.61B4.29B84%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
CTXAF vs SPTJF: Fundamental Ratings
CTXAF
SPTJF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
5050
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
45
Fair valued
74
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
70100
SMR RATING
1..100
9889
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
5745
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
33
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
55n/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

CTXAF's Valuation (45) in the null industry is in the same range as SPTJF (74). This means that CTXAF’s stock grew similarly to SPTJF’s over the last 12 months.

CTXAF's Profit vs Risk Rating (70) in the null industry is in the same range as SPTJF (100). This means that CTXAF’s stock grew similarly to SPTJF’s over the last 12 months.

SPTJF's SMR Rating (89) in the null industry is in the same range as CTXAF (98). This means that SPTJF’s stock grew similarly to CTXAF’s over the last 12 months.

SPTJF's Price Growth Rating (45) in the null industry is in the same range as CTXAF (57). This means that SPTJF’s stock grew similarly to CTXAF’s over the last 12 months.

SPTJF's P/E Growth Rating (3) in the null industry is in the same range as CTXAF (3). This means that SPTJF’s stock grew similarly to CTXAF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
CTXAFSPTJF
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
57%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
68%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
62%
MACD
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
64%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
33%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
35%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
32%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
34%
Advances
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 8 days ago
67%
Declines
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
69%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
SPTJF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
PAMC44.940.43
+0.97%
Pacer Lunt MidCap Multi-Factor Alt ETF
CLOI53.100.22
+0.42%
VanEck CLO ETF
UFEB34.870.05
+0.15%
Innovator US Equity Ultra Bffr ETF™ Feb
TOGA35.300.03
+0.07%
Tremblant Global ETF
XDJL37.28N/A
N/A
Innovator US Equity Accelerated ETF - July

CTXAF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that CTXAF and CLSZF have been poorly correlated (+21% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that CTXAF and CLSZF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To CTXAF
1D Price
Change %
CTXAF100%
N/A
CLSZF - CTXAF
21%
Poorly correlated
N/A
RBSFY - CTXAF
16%
Poorly correlated
+1.73%
NTOIY - CTXAF
16%
Poorly correlated
-1.33%
NTOIF - CTXAF
14%
Poorly correlated
-6.34%
PKIUF - CTXAF
9%
Poorly correlated
-0.39%
More

SPTJF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that SPTJF and RUBSF have been poorly correlated (+7% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that SPTJF and RUBSF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To SPTJF
1D Price
Change %
SPTJF100%
N/A
RUBSF - SPTJF
7%
Poorly correlated
N/A
NZRFF - SPTJF
4%
Poorly correlated
N/A
CTXAF - SPTJF
2%
Poorly correlated
N/A
NTOIY - SPTJF
1%
Poorly correlated
-1.33%
NTOIF - SPTJF
1%
Poorly correlated
-6.34%
More