CTXAF
Price
$16.30
Change
+$1.84 (+12.72%)
Updated
May 9 closing price
Capitalization
5.25B
RBSFY
Price
$6.50
Change
-$0.11 (-1.67%)
Updated
Jul 3 closing price
Capitalization
2.55B
Interact to see
Advertisement

CTXAF vs RBSFY

Header iconCTXAF vs RBSFY Comparison
Open Charts CTXAF vs RBSFYBanner chart's image
Ampol
Price$16.30
Change+$1.84 (+12.72%)
Volume$750
Capitalization5.25B
Rubis
Price$6.50
Change-$0.11 (-1.67%)
Volume$208
Capitalization2.55B
CTXAF vs RBSFY Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
CTXAF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
RBSFY
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
CTXAF vs. RBSFY commentary
Jul 07, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CTXAF is a Hold and RBSFY is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jul 07, 2025
Stock price -- (CTXAF: $16.30 vs. RBSFY: $6.49)
Brand notoriety: CTXAF and RBSFY are both not notable
Both companies represent the Oil Refining/Marketing industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: CTXAF: 15% vs. RBSFY: 19%
Market capitalization -- CTXAF: $5.25B vs. RBSFY: $2.55B
CTXAF [@Oil Refining/Marketing] is valued at $5.25B. RBSFY’s [@Oil Refining/Marketing] market capitalization is $2.55B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Oil Refining/Marketing] industry ranges from $73.66B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Oil Refining/Marketing] industry is $8.79B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

CTXAF’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileRBSFY’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • CTXAF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • RBSFY’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, RBSFY is a better buy in the long-term than CTXAF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

CTXAF’s TA Score shows that 1 TA indicator(s) are bullish while RBSFY’s TA Score has 2 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • CTXAF’s TA Score: 1 bullish, 1 bearish.
  • RBSFY’s TA Score: 2 bullish, 5 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, CTXAF is a better buy in the short-term than RBSFY.

Price Growth

CTXAF (@Oil Refining/Marketing) experienced а 0.00% price change this week, while RBSFY (@Oil Refining/Marketing) price change was +0.85% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Oil Refining/Marketing industry was +2.82%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +6.72%, and the average quarterly price growth was +8.28%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Oil Refining/Marketing (+2.82% weekly)

The Oil Refining/Marketing segment includes companies that refine crude oil into a number of petroleum products, including gasoline, jet fuel and diesel, and then sell the usable products to the end users. These companies are involved in what’s called downstream operations in the oil business. They also engage in the marketing and distribution of crude oil and natural gas products. In other words, the downstream oil and gas business is focused on post-production processes of crude oil and natural gas. When oil prices slump, downstream businesses are hurt less or in some cases even benefit, since their purchase cost of crude oil goes down. Some of the biggest U.S. oil refining/marketing companies include Phillips 66, Marathon Petroleum Corporation and Valero Energy Corp.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CTXAF($5.25B) has a higher market cap than RBSFY($2.55B). CTXAF has higher P/E ratio than RBSFY: CTXAF (10.16) vs RBSFY (8.54). RBSFY YTD gains are higher at: 51.635 vs. CTXAF (1.875). CTXAF has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 1.49B vs. RBSFY (489M). CTXAF has higher revenues than RBSFY: CTXAF (38.2B) vs RBSFY (7.14B).
CTXAFRBSFYCTXAF / RBSFY
Capitalization5.25B2.55B206%
EBITDA1.49B489M305%
Gain YTD1.87551.6354%
P/E Ratio10.168.54119%
Revenue38.2B7.14B535%
Total Cash126MN/A-
Total Debt3.61BN/A-
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
CTXAF vs RBSFY: Fundamental Ratings
CTXAF
RBSFY
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
5050
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
45
Fair valued
29
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
6971
SMR RATING
1..100
9888
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
5743
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
343
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
55n/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

RBSFY's Valuation (29) in the null industry is in the same range as CTXAF (45). This means that RBSFY’s stock grew similarly to CTXAF’s over the last 12 months.

CTXAF's Profit vs Risk Rating (69) in the null industry is in the same range as RBSFY (71). This means that CTXAF’s stock grew similarly to RBSFY’s over the last 12 months.

RBSFY's SMR Rating (88) in the null industry is in the same range as CTXAF (98). This means that RBSFY’s stock grew similarly to CTXAF’s over the last 12 months.

RBSFY's Price Growth Rating (43) in the null industry is in the same range as CTXAF (57). This means that RBSFY’s stock grew similarly to CTXAF’s over the last 12 months.

CTXAF's P/E Growth Rating (3) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for RBSFY (43). This means that CTXAF’s stock grew somewhat faster than RBSFY’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
CTXAFRBSFY
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
72%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
56%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
54%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 6 days ago
31%
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
56%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
33%
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
57%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
34%
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
61%
Advances
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Declines
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
67%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
20%
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
73%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
CTXAF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
RBSFY
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
DALI26.740.22
+0.83%
First Trust Dorsey Wright DALI 1 ETF
FLIN39.87N/A
N/A
Franklin FTSE India ETF
QTJA27.24N/A
N/A
Innovator Growth Accelerated Pls ETF Jan
BMDL24.79N/A
N/A
VictoryShares WestEnd Economic Cyc BdETF
FDHY48.87-0.04
-0.08%
Fidelity Enhanced High Yield ETF

CTXAF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that CTXAF and CLSZF have been poorly correlated (+21% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that CTXAF and CLSZF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To CTXAF
1D Price
Change %
CTXAF100%
N/A
CLSZF - CTXAF
21%
Poorly correlated
N/A
RBSFY - CTXAF
16%
Poorly correlated
-1.59%
NTOIY - CTXAF
16%
Poorly correlated
+3.98%
NTOIF - CTXAF
14%
Poorly correlated
N/A
PKIUF - CTXAF
9%
Poorly correlated
+0.21%
More

RBSFY and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that RBSFY and CTXAF have been poorly correlated (+16% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that RBSFY and CTXAF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To RBSFY
1D Price
Change %
RBSFY100%
-1.59%
CTXAF - RBSFY
16%
Poorly correlated
N/A
RUBSF - RBSFY
13%
Poorly correlated
N/A
NTOIY - RBSFY
11%
Poorly correlated
+3.98%
OILRF - RBSFY
11%
Poorly correlated
N/A
PKIUF - RBSFY
11%
Poorly correlated
+0.21%
More